Dergiler / Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology / 2014 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of demographic data in patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Southeastern Anatolia and the Black Sea region: A multicenter study

Sayfa
31–34
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Lower mean ages and higher stone sizes in patients undergoing PNL in southeastern Anatolia suggest that geographic factors can affect stone disease.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare demographic data in adult patients undergoing percutane- ous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for kidney stone disease in university hospitals from Southeastern Anatolia and the Black Sea regions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Material and methods: The demographic data of 535 (53.3%) patients undergoing PNL from Gaziantep University, Department of Urology (GAUN group), and 468 (46.6%) patients undergoing PNL from On- dokuz Mayıs University, Department of Urology (OMU group) were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Lower mean ages and higher stone sizes in patients undergoing PNL in southeastern Anatolia suggest that geographic factors can affect stone disease.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare demographic data in adult patients undergoing percutane- ous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for kidney stone disease in university hospitals from Southeastern Anatolia and the Black Sea regions. Material and methods: The demographic data of 535 (53.3%) patients undergoing PNL from Gaziantep University, Department of Urology (GAUN group), and 468 (46.6%) patients undergoing PNL from On- dokuz Mayıs University, Department of Urology (OMU group) were evaluated retrospectively. Patients’ gender, mean age, stone laterality, and size and results of the stone analyses were compared. Results: The mean patient ages were 40.94±13.33 (17-81) and 48.03±13.95 (17-81) years in the GAUN and OMU Groups, respectively, (p=0.0001). The mean stone size was 716.01±449.60 (100-3000) mm 2 and 612.7±445.87 (65-3220) mm 2 in the GAUN and OMU Groups, respectively (p=0.0001). There were no statistically signifcant differences between the groups with respect to stone laterality (p=0.196), and gender of the patients (p=0.65). Stone analysis revealed that the distribution of stone composition was as follows in the GAUN group: Ca oxa- late (90.19%), cystine (7.84%), uric acid (5.88%), and struvite (1.96%). In the OMU group, the stone composi- tion was as follows: Ca oxalate (86.84%), cystine (1.34%), uric acid (13.15%), and struvite (9.21%). Conclusion: The incidence of kidney stone disease varies throughout Turkey based on etiological factors, and a higher incidence of kidney stone disease is observed in the Southeastern Anatolia region endemically. Lower mean ages and higher stone sizes in patients undergoing PNL in southeastern Anatolia suggest that geographic factors can affect stone disease.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYRAK, Ö., ÖNEM, K., SEÇKİNER, İ., SIRTBAŞ, A., ERTURHAN, M. S., AŞCI, R., ŞEN, H., BÜYÜKALPELLİ, R., ERBAĞCI, A., GERMİYANOĞLU, C., YAĞCI, F. (2014). Comparison of demographic data in patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Southeastern Anatolia and the Black Sea region: A multicenter study. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 31–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/328896

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Hesse A, Siener R. Current aspects of epidemiology and nutrition in urinary stones. World J Urol 1997
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Tefekli A, Tok A, Altundere F, Barut M, Berberoğlu Y, Müslümanoğlu AY. Life Style and Dietary Habits in Patients with Urinary Stone Disease. Turkish Journal of Urology 2005
  3. 1 3. Curhan GC, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ. Regional varia- tion in nephrolithiasis incidence and prevalence among United States men. J Urol 1994
  4. Iguchi M, Umekawa T, Katoh Y, Kohri K, Kurita T. Prevalence of urolithiasis in Kaizuka City, Japan-an epidemiologic study of urinary stones. Int J Urol 1996
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Vahlensieck EW, Bach D, Hesse A. Incidence, prevalence and mortality of urolithiasis in the German Federal Republic. Urol Res 1982
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Akıncı M, Esen T, Tellaloğlu S. Urinary stone disease in Turkey: An updated epidemiological study. Eur Urol 1991
  7. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA Nyberg LM, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int 2003
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Erturhan SM, Bayrak Ö, Penbegül N, Seçkiner İ, Söylemez H, Sancaktutar AA, et al. The approach of urologists to kidney stones in Southeastern Anatolia: a questionnaire survey. Turkish Journal of Urology 2012
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Yüksel MB, Kar A, Çiloğlu M. The applicability of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in provincial state hospitals: the experience of the State Hospital of Mus in first 100 cases. Turkish Journal of Urology 2010
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Uluocak N, Erdemir F, Atılgan D, Erkorkmaz Ü, Çetin İ, Parlaktaş BS. The prevalence of urinary system stone disease in Tokat prov- ince. Turkish Journal of Urology 2010
  11. Pinduli I, Spivacow R, Valle E, Vidal S, Negri AL, Previgliano H, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis is in the autonomous city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Urol Res 2006
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Trinchieri A, Coppi F, Montanari E, Del Nero A, Zanetti G, Pisani E. Increase in the prevalence of symptomaticupper urinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol 2000
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Safarinejad MR. Adult urolithiasis in a population based study in Iran: prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Urol Res 2007
  14. [CrossRef] 14. Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, Tepeler A, Esen T, et al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey.I: Changing characteristics of urolithiasis. Ur