Dergiler / Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

Laparoscopic resection for colorectal diseases: short-term outcomes of a single center

Sayfa
199–202
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

No mortality was recorded in this series of patients.Conclusion: This study showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery could be performed safely based on its low complication rate, short length of hospital stay, providing sufficient surgical resection and lymph node dissection.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Even though, laparoscopy is not accepted as the current gold standard in colorectal surgery, it can be performed as safely as open surgery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we evaluated the results of 33 patients with laparoscopic colorectal resection.Material and Methods: Thirty-three patients who underwent laparoscopic colon surgery between January 2013 and September 2014 in the General Surgery Clinic at Marmara University Hospital were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:No mortality was recorded in this series of patients.Conclusion: This study showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery could be performed safely based on its low complication rate, short length of hospital stay, providing sufficient surgical resection and lymph node dissection.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Even though, laparoscopy is not accepted as the current gold standard in colorectal surgery, it can be performed as safely as open surgery. It is also widely accepted that the technique has many advantages. In this study, we evaluated the results of 33 patients with laparoscopic colorectal resection.Material and Methods: Thirty-three patients who underwent laparoscopic colon surgery between January 2013 and September 2014 in the General Surgery Clinic at Marmara University Hospital were included in the study. Patients were evaluated in terms of their demographic and tumor histopathologic characteristics, type of surgery and early postoperative complications. Results: Laparoscopic colorectal resection was performed for 33 patients who had malignant or benign lesions. The median age was 60 , and 18 (55%) were male patients. The majority of the patients (90%) were diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma. Half of the patients were T3 and 67% had N0 stage. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 17 . Negative surgical margins were obtained in all patients. The postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. Postoperative early complications were observed in only 5 patients. The majority of complications were treated without the need for surgery. No mortality was recorded in this series of patients.Conclusion: This study showed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery could be performed safely based on its low complication rate, short length of hospital stay, providing sufficient surgical resection and lymph node dissection.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATTAALLAH, W., BABAYEV, H., YARDIMCI, S., CİNGİ, A., UĞURLU, M. Ü., GÜNAL, Ö. (2016). Laparoscopic resection for colorectal diseases: short-term outcomes of a single center. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 199–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/325360

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Hewitt PM, Ip SM, Kwok SP, Somers SS, Li K, Leung KL, et al. Lapa- roscopic assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: com- parative study of immune effects. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 901-909. [CrossRef] Rose J, Schneider C, Yildirim C, Geers P, Scheidbach H, Köckerling F. Complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicentre trial. Tech Coloproctol 2004; 8: 25-28. [CrossRef] 3. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1: 144-150.
  2. Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF. Subcutaneous me- tastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 1994; 344: 58. [CrossRef] Vukasin P, Ortega AE, Greene FL, Steele GD, Simons AJ, Anthone GJ, et al, Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection: results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 20-23. [CrossRef] 201 American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS); Gas- trointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Fleshman J, Marcello P, Stamos MJ, Wexner SD. Focus Group on Laparoscopic Colectomy Education as endorsed by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES): guidelines for laparoscopic colectomy course. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1162- 1167. [CrossRef] Kalfaoglu M, Hansel H, Cevheroglu C, Gurkut O, Ciner F, Beroval O, et al, A study on laparoscopic colorectal surgery in T.R.N.C. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2013; 23: 157-161.
  3. Martel G, Boushey RP. Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am 2006; 86: 867-897. [CrossRef] Kurt A, Tekinel M, Aksoy S, Yanar H. Laparoscopic resection for the colorectal diseases: first 26 cases. C.Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2008; 30: 14-19.
  4. Gupta A, Watson DI. Effect of laparoscopy on immune function. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1296-1306. [CrossRef] Melotti G, Tamborrino E, Lazzaretti MG, Bonilauri S, Mecheri F, Piccoli M. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 1999; 16: 332-336. [CrossRef] Stocchi L, Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer trial update. J Surg Oncol 1998; 68: 255-267. [CrossRef] Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colec- tomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 636- 640. [CrossRef] Stage JG, Shulze S, Moller P, Overgaard H, Andersen M, Rebsdorf- Pede