Dergiler / Ulusal Travma Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of physical findings in acute wrist trauma in the emergency department

Sayfa
257–261
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: Edema, pain on grip and supination, and especially pain on passive and active motion and localized tenderness can be valuable to predict or rule out fracture in acute wrist trauma cases who have no deformity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of physical findings to predict fracture in patients with acute wrist trauma.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS: This prospective clinical study was conducted over a period of four months from December 1998.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: Edema, pain on grip and supination, and especially pain on passive and active motion and localized tenderness can be valuable to predict or rule out fracture in acute wrist trauma cases who have no deformity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Ağrı ölçümü · Akut hastalık · Acil servis

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the value of physical findings to predict fracture in patients with acute wrist trauma. METHODS: This prospective clinical study was conducted over a period of four months from December 1998. The patients who were older than 18 years and presenting with acute wrist trauma within 24 hours of the time of injury were included in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was done for the patients who had inconsistency between clinical and radiographic diagnosis. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study. Four fractures were diagnosed on the MRI of eight patients who have contradiction between clinical diagnosis and X-ray studies. The positive predictive values of edema, localized tenderness, pain on active and passive motion, pain with grip and pain in supination were found as 95.2%, 67.3%, 77.3%, 91,7%, 89.3%, and 96%, respectively. Physical findings having high sensitivity were found as localized tenderness (94.3%), pain on the active and passive motion (97.1%, 94.3%, respectively). Pain on the active and passive motion were determined as physical findings with highest negative predictive values (%90.9, %89.5, respectively). CONCLUSION: Edema, pain on grip and supination, and especially pain on passive and active motion and localized tenderness can be valuable to predict or rule out fracture in acute wrist trauma cases who have no deformity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇEVİK, A. A., GÜNAL, İ., MANİSALI, M., YANTURALI, S., ATİLLA, R., PEKDEMİR, M., GÜNERLİ, A., HOLLIMAN, C. J. (2003). Evaluation of physical findings in acute wrist trauma in the emergency department. Ulusal Travma Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 257–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/324955

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Cameron P, Dziukas L, Hadj A, et al. Rib fractures in major trauma. Aust N.Z.J. Surg 1996; 66: 530-534
  2. Segers P, Van Schilp, Jorens Ph, et al. Thoracic trauma: an analysis of 187 patients. Acta Chir Belg 2001; 101: 277-282
  3. Jones KW. Thoracic trauma. Surg Clin North Am 1980; 60: 957-981 4. Yalçınkaya İ, Sayır F, Kurnaz M ve arkadaşları. Göğüs travması: 126 olgunun analizi. Ulus Travma Derg. 2000; 6: 288-291
  4. LoCicero J 3rd, Mattox KL. Epidemiolojy of chest trauma. Surg Clin North Am. 1989;69: 15-19
  5. Clark GC, Schecter WP, Trunkey DD. Variables affecting outcome in blunt chest trauma: flail chest vs. pulmonary contusion. J Trauma 1988; 28: 298-304
  6. Lewis FR. Thoracic Trauma. Surg Clin North Am 1982; 62: 97-104
  7. Crawford WO Jr. Pulmonary injury in thoracic and non-thoracic trauma. Radiol Clin North Am1973; 11: 527-541
  8. Nast-Colb D, Waydhas C, Gippner-Steppert C, et al. Indicators of the posttraumatic inflamatory response corralate with organ failure in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 1997; 42: 446-454
  9. Cohn SM. Pulmonary contusion: review of the clinical entity. J Trauma 1997; 42: 973-979
  10. Exadaktylos AK. Scabalas G, Schimid SW, et al. Do we really need routine computed tomographic scanning in the primary evaluation of blunt chest trauma in patients with “Normal” chest radiograph?. J Trauma 2001; 51: 1173-1176
  11. Kahraman C, Akçalı Y, Emiroğulları N ve arkadaşları. Künt toraks travması: 1200 olgunun analizi. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi 1995; 17: 318-324
  12. Özçelik C, İnci İ, Nizam Ö ve arkadaşları. Künt toraks travması: 724 olgunun analizi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 1995; 22: 43-51
  13. Aihara R, Millham FH, Blansfield J, et al. Emergency room thoracotomy for penetrating chest injury: Effect of an Institutional Protocol. J Trauma 2001; 50: 1027-1030
  14. Deneuville M. Injury of the pulmonary artery and ıts branches due to penetrating chest trauma. Ann Vasc Surg 2000;14: 463-467
  15. Beal SL, McKennan M. Blunt diaphragm rupture. A morbid injury. Arch Surg. 1988; 123: 828-832.