Dergiler / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of anatomical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing repair of traumatic canalicular laceration

Sayfa
66–71
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Canalicular irrigation indicated all canaliculi were patent.CONCLUSION: Recent microsurgical techniques result in successful repair of canalicular laceration.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate functional and anatomical success of traumatic canalicular laceration repair.METHODS: Consecutive patients who presented at Atatürk Training and Research Hospital Eye Clinic, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine and had canalicular laceration repair performed by the same surgeon between January 2009 and December 2014 were included in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patency of lacrimal system was assessed with canalicular irrigation.RESULTS: Thirty-five male and 6 female patients were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Canalicular irrigation indicated all canaliculi were patent.CONCLUSION: Recent microsurgical techniques result in successful repair of canalicular laceration.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate functional and anatomical success of traumatic canalicular laceration repair.METHODS: Consecutive patients who presented at Atatürk Training and Research Hospital Eye Clinic, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine and had canalicular laceration repair performed by the same surgeon between January 2009 and December 2014 were included in the study. Demographic data, length of time between injury and surgery, and cause of the trauma, surgical method employed, and duration of follow-up were recorded. Postoperative epiphora was evaluated using Munk score. Patency of lacrimal system was assessed with canalicular irrigation.RESULTS: Thirty-five male and 6 female patients were included in the study. Mean age of 41 participants was 31.85±18.9 years (range: 1-79 years). Avulsive injury was observed in 66% (n=27), and direct (penetrating) injury in 34% (n=14). Distribution of injured canaliculi was as follows: left inferior canaliculus 63.4% (n=26), right inferior canaliculus 19.5% (n=8), right superior canaliculus 9.8% (n=4), and left superior canaliculus 7.3% (n=3). Thirty-four patients had monocanalicular tube implantation (mini-Monoka) and 10 patients had bicanalicular annular intubation using pigtail probe. Average follow-up time was 6±5.7 months. Munk score was Grade 0 in all patients. Canalicular irrigation indicated all canaliculi were patent.CONCLUSION: Recent microsurgical techniques result in successful repair of canalicular laceration.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYTOĞAN, H., KARADENİZ, Ş. U. (2017). Evaluation of anatomical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing repair of traumatic canalicular laceration. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 66–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/324811

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. McCord CD. The lacrimal drainage system. In: Duane TD, Jaeger EA, eds. Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Harper&Row Pub, 1985:1
  2. Royer J, Adenis JP, Bernard JA. L'appareil Lacrimal. Paris: Masson 1982;17:25-75
  3. Menteş J. Lakrimal sistem; anatomi, fizyoloji, fizyopatoloji. In: Hasanreisoğlu B, editör. XI. Ulusal Oftalmoloji Kursu Bülteni. Ankara: Yıldırım Ofset Basımevi; 1991. s. 18-28
  4. Günenç Ü, Maden A. Kapak yaralanmalarında silikon tüp ile kanalikül rekonstrüksiyonu. Türkiye Klinikleri Oftalmoloji 1995;4:1-4
  5. Jordan DR, Ziai S, Gilberg SM, Mawn LA. Pathogenesis of canalicular lacerations. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;24:394-8
  6. Wulc AE, Arterberry JF. The pathogenesis of canalicular laceration. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1243-9
  7. Morrison FD. An aid to repair of lacerated tear ducts. Arch Ophthalmol 1964;72:341-2
  8. Lerner HA, Boynton JR. Sodium hyaluronate (Healon) as an adjunct to lacrimal surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;99:365
  9. Yang X, Jin T, Pang X. Repair of a canalicular laceration in a neonate. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2005;42:306-7
  10. Kennedy RH, May J, Dailey J, Flanagan JC. Canalicular laceration. An 11-year epidemiologic and clinical study. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;6:46-53
  11. Naik MN, Kelapure A, Rath S, Honavar SG. Management of canalicular lacerations: epidemiological aspects and experience with Mini-Monoka monocanalicular stent. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:375-380
  12. Argın A, Demir MN, Duman S. Kanalikül kesilerinde onarım teknikleri. Türk Oftalmoloji Gazetesi 2001;31:327-32
  13. Demir T, Gül FC. Results of Canalicular Laceration Reperation by Pigtail Probe and Silicon Tube Entubation. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2011;18:87-90
  14. Tazartès M, Bénarafa H. Orbital, eyelid and lacrimal trauma. [Article in French] Rev Prat 1995;45:437-41. [Abstract] 15. Hawes MJ, Segrest DR. Effectiveness of bicanalicular silicone intubation in the repair of canalicular lacerations. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;1:185-90
  15. Walter WL. The use of the pigtail probe for silicone intubation of the injured canaliculus. Ophthalmic Surg 1982;13:488-92
  16. Garber PF. Management of injuries to the lacrimal system, in bosniak. SL (ed). Advences in opthalmic plastic and recosntructive surgery. The lacrimal system Vol 3 New york Pergamon press 1984;175-95
  17. Kersten RC, Kulwin DR. "One-stitch" canalicular repair. A simplified approach for repair of canalicular laceration. Ophthalmology 1996;103:785-9