Air conditioner alternatives are ranked by using these two methods and also the results are compared
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Installing the most suitable heating and cooling systems to the offices for the firms is one of the important decisions to be made because of the energy efficiency and working conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This decision requires the selection of the proper air conditioner considering several conflicting factors.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Air conditioner alternatives are ranked by using these two methods and also the results are compared
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:air conditioner selection · COPRAS method · ARAS method
Abstract
Installing the most suitable heating and cooling systems to the offices for the firms is one of the important decisions to be made because of the energy efficiency and working conditions. This decision requires the selection of the proper air conditioner considering several conflicting factors. Soit can be handled with the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. In this paper COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment) and ARAS (Additive Ratio ASsessment) methods are used to reach a solution for the air conditioner selection problem in the literature. Air conditioner alternatives are ranked by using these two methods and also the results are compared
ADALİ, E. A., IŞIK, A. T. (2016). AIR CONDITIONER SELECTION PROBLEM WITH COPRAS AND ARAS METHODS. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 124–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/3244
Andruškevicius, A. (2005). Evaluation of contractors by using COPRAS - the multiple criteria method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 11(3), 158–169.
Bakshi, T. & Sarkar, B. (2011). MCA based performance evaluation of project selection. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA), 2(2), 14-22.
Balezentiene, L., & Kusta, A. (2012). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in grassland ecosystems of the central Lithuania: multi-criteria evaluation on a basis of the ARAS method. The Scientific World Journal, 1-11.
Balzentis, A., Balzentis, T. & Misiunas, A. (2012). An integrated assessment of lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(1), 34–53.
Banaitiene, N., Banaitis, A., Kaklauskas, A. & Zavadskas, E.K. (2008). Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach. Omega, 36, 429 – 441. Barak, S., Mehrgini, B., Maghsoudlou, H., & Branch, Q. (2014). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach To Candidate Well Selection For Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment, CIE44 & IMSS‟14 Proceedings, 14-16
October, Istanbul / Turkey, 2092-2106.
Bindu Madhuri, Ch, Chandulal. J & Padmaja. M. (2010). Selection of best web site by applying COPRAS-G method. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 1(2), 138-146.
Chatterjee, N., & Bose, G. (2013). Selection of vendors for wind farm under fuzzy MCDM environment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(4), 535-546.
Chatterjee, P. & Chakraborty, S. (2012). Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Materials and Design, 35, 384–393.
Chatterjee, P. & Chakraborty, S. (2014). Flexible manufacturing system selection using preference ranking methods: A comparative study, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5, 315– 338. Chatterjee, P. (2013). Applications of Preference Ranking-Based Methods for Decision-Making in Manufacturing Environment, PhD Thesis, Jadavpur University, Kolkata. Chatterjee, P. & Chakraborty, S. (2013). Gear Material Selection using Complex Proportional Assessment and Additive Ratio Assessment-based Approaches: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 1(2), 104-111.
Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Dadeliene, R. (2012). Multiple criteria assessment of elite security personal on the basis of ARAS and expert methods. Economic Co