Dergiler / Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 23

EVALUATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN AMASRA’S URBAN LANDSCAPE

Sayfa
19–34
Yayın Tarihi
2014-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study offers suggestions to improve the positive effects found in Amasra urban landscape and recommends corrective actions and programmes towards the negative effects to the government, local administration, voluntary environmental institutions and visitors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz This study examines Amasra district which is a small tourism center in the West Black Sea Region in Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The natural and cultural landscape heritage of the city has been effected by the unplanned urban development and misuses based on tourism.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study offers suggestions to improve the positive effects found in Amasra urban landscape and recommends corrective actions and programmes towards the negative effects to the government, local administration, voluntary environmental institutions and visitors.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Sustainable tourism · urban landscape · planning

Özet

Öz This study examines Amasra district which is a small tourism center in the West Black Sea Region in Turkey. The natural and cultural landscape heritage of the city has been effected by the unplanned urban development and misuses based on tourism. Amasra‟s landscape heritage should be served to meet needs of current people for tourism and also be passed to feature generation with minimum disruption. In this scope, the natural and cultural landscape values of Amasra are examined under the light of the questionnaires applied on local people and visitors, face to face interviews with experts, written and oral information obtained, literature review and observations made in the field. As a result of the evaluations, it is found that an effective sustainable tourism development is necessary because such negative factors as the rapid urbanization, loss of historical values, visual pollution, noise, lack of infrastructure and lack of environmental awareness are dominant in the district compared to economic, social, cultural and environmental positive impacts of tourism. This study offers suggestions to improve the positive effects found in Amasra urban landscape and recommends corrective actions and programmes towards the negative effects to the government, local administration, voluntary environmental institutions and visitors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NAYİM, Y. S. (2014). EVALUATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN AMASRA’S URBAN LANDSCAPE. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 23, 19–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/32260

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Açıksöz, S. 2001. A Research on the Revision of „Atatürk Forest Farm‟ Under Contemporary Conditions with respect to Urban Agriculture in Ankara, Doctoral Dissertation. University of Ankara, Ankara. Anonymous 1991. Ortak geleceğimiz. Türkiye Çevre Sorunları Vakfı Yayını, Ankara: Önder Matbaa. Anonymous 1999. Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıkları Yüksek Kurulu İlke Kararları. T.C. Kültür Bakanlığı Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. Anonymous 2000a. İlçenin Genel Olarak Tanıtılması. Amasra Kaymakamlığı Yıllık Brifing Raporu, Amasra. Anonymous 2000b. Bartın İli Mavi Bayrak Kampanyası Su Analiz Sonuçları. Bartın İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü, Bartın. Anonymous 2001a. Bartın-Amasra Meteoroloji İstasyonu 1991-2000
  2. İklim Verileri, Meteoroloji İl Müdürlüğü, Bartın. Anonymous 2001b. Kültür Bakanlığı KTVKYK Kararları. Kültür İl Müdürlüğü, Bartın. Anonymous 2001c.
  3. Amasra. Sesamos Dergisi, Amasra Anadolu Otelcilik ve Turizm Meslek Lisesi Yayını, 5, Ankara.
  4. Atik, S. 1992. Bartın İl Turizm Envanteri ve Turizmi Geliştirme Planı Açıklama Raporu. Bartın Valiliği, Bartın. Bell, J. 1993. Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First Time Researchers in Education and Social Science. Second Edition,
  5. Buckingham, Phidelphia: Open University Press.
  6. Burton, D. 1997. Quantitative Methods. Design-Data Collection Issues, Lecturer‟s Handout, Block 5, Social Science Division of Graduate School, University of Sheffield, UK. Davidson, J. 1970. Outdoor Recreation Surveys: The Design and Use of Questionnaires of Site Surveys.Countryside Commission, London. Gezici, F. 1998. Sürdürülebilir Bölgesel Kalkınma Amacında Turizm Eylemlerinin Etkisi Türkiye Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma, Doctoral dissertation, University of İstanbul Technical, İstanbul.
  7. Gökçe, B. 1992. Toplumsal Bilimlerde Araştırma. Ankara:
  8. Baran Ofset Gülez, S. 1979. Doğu Karadeniz Kıyı Şeridinde Rekreasyon Potansiyelinin Saptanması ve Değerlendirilmesi, Doctoral Dissertation, University of İstanbul,
  9. İstanbul.
  10. Gülez, S. 1994. Green Tourism: A Case Study. Annals of Tourism Research, 21( 2), p. 413-415.
  11. Gülez, S. 1998. Doğal Varlıklarımızın (Dağlar, Ormanlar, Göller, Akarsular) Koruma-Kullanma Dengeleri Gözetilerek Turizme Kazandırılması, I. Turizm Şurası, Ankara, p. 40-42.
  12. Himmetoğlu, B. 1992.
  13. What is Soft Tourism, Architecture of Soft Tourism Seminar Proceedings, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, p. 199-208.
  14. Jafari, J. and Wall, G. 1994. Sustainable Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(3), p. 667-669. Mclnt