Dergiler / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2018 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3

STRATEGIC DISASTER MANAGEMENT WITH ‘FAMILY’ AS A DECISION LAYER AND PARTICIPATORY LOCAL PLANNING

Sayfa
1187–1197
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Model claims that participation in the planning processes of which local knowledge is made use causes public motivation on support of disaster management processes and forms social consciousness as well.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Disaster risks are usually managed by central planning functions of national governments, consequently local knowledge of various geographies and cultures cannot be transferred to the planning processes effectively.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Article models three strategic decision layers, namely (1) national management, (2) risk mitigation planning group which is formed by related shareholders and stakeholders, and (3) family, to manage disaster risks effectively; and calls it as ‘strategic disaster management’.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Model claims that participation in the planning processes of which local knowledge is made use causes public motivation on support of disaster management processes and forms social consciousness as well.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Disaster risks are usually managed by central planning functions of national governments, consequently local knowledge of various geographies and cultures cannot be transferred to the planning processes effectively. This situation leads to the lack of community support for the disaster risk management issues. Article models three strategic decision layers, namely (1) national management, (2) risk mitigation planning group which is formed by related shareholders and stakeholders, and (3) family, to manage disaster risks effectively; and calls it as ‘strategic disaster management’. Model claims that participation in the planning processes of which local knowledge is made use causes public motivation on support of disaster management processes and forms social consciousness as well.

Abstract

Afet riskleri, ulusal yönetimin merkezi planlarıyla yönetilmekte, bu nedenle çeşitli coğrafya ve kültürlerin oluşturduğu yerel bilgi planlama süreçlerine etkin aktarılamamaktadır. Bu durum afet risk azaltma planlarına ve hazırlık süreçlerine toplumdan yeterli destek alınamamasına neden olmakta, konuya ilişkin toplumsal bilinç oluşturulamamaktadır. Bu çalışma; (1) ulusal yönetim, (2) yereldeki ilgili paydaş ve etkileşenlerden oluşan risk azaltma planlama grubu ve (3) aileyi stratejik planlamaya ilişkin üç karar kademesi olarak modellemekte, risk yönetimi odaklı bu modeli ‘stratejik afet yönetimi’ olarak adlandırmaktadır. Model sonucunda, yerel bilginin etkin kullanıldığı planlama süreçlerine katılımın afet hazırlık, müdahale ve iyileştirme süreçlerine de katılım motivasyonu yaratılacağı, ayrıca konuya ilişkin toplumsal bilinç oluşumu sağlanacağı değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YETİŞ, Ö., GÖKDENİZ, İ. (2018). STRATEGIC DISASTER MANAGEMENT WITH ‘FAMILY’ AS A DECISION LAYER AND PARTICIPATORY LOCAL PLANNING. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 3, 1187–1197. https://ajindex.com/articles/318662

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Alexander, David (2006, Spring), "Globalization of Disaster: Trends, Problems And Dilemmas". Journal of International Affairs, V: 59, I: 2, p: 11. Blanchard, B.Wayne (2007), (Updated: 2008-10-27) "Guide To Emergency Management And Related Terms, Definitions Concepts, Acronyms, Organizations, Programs, Guidance, Executive Orders & Legislation: A Tutorial on Emergency Management, Broadly Defined, Past and Present". https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/terms and definitions/terms and definitions.pdf. Ersoy, Şükrü. (2016). "2015 Yılının Doğa Kaynaklı Afetleri "Dünya ve Türkiye" ". Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası, Ankara.
  2. Gökdeniz, İ., Kartal, C., & Yetiş, Ö. (2017). "Kurumsal Yönetim Amaçlarına Ulaşmak için Yönetim Modeli: Kurumsal Öğrenmeyi Destekleyen İç Denetim". Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, V: 4, I:3, p: 70-76.
  3. Grahn, T., & Nyberg, L. (2017). "Assessment of Pluvial Flood Exposure and Vulnerability of Residential Areas". International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, I: 21, p: 367-375. IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies). https://www.ifrc.org/en/what-we-do/disaster-management/about-disasters/what-is-adisaster/, (Accessed:28.10.2018) IIA&RIMS. (2012). "Executive Report/ Risk Management and Internal Audit: Forging a Collaborative Alliance". The Institute of Internal Audiors, Inc. & The Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc., Florida/USA. Ikeda, S. (2006). "An Integrated Risk Analysis Framework for Emerging Disaster Risks: Toward a better risk management". A better integrated management of disaster risks: Toward resilient society to emerging disaster risks in mega-cities (by S. Ikeda, T. Fukuzono, & T. Sato). TERRAPUB and NIED, Tokyo, p. 1-22.
  4. ISO. (2009). "ISO31000 Risk Management Principles and Guidelines". International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland. ISO. (2018, February). "ISO31000 Risk Management Guideless". International Organization for Standardization. Geneva, Switzerland. KPMG. (2013, May 14). "COSO Internal Control-Integrated Framework". Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler Accounting Firm, Canada. Mintzberg, Henry. (1993, Fall). "The Pitfalls of Strategic Planning". California Management Review, p: 38-44.
  5. Mojtahedi, M., & Oo, B. L. (2017). "Critical attributes for proactive engagement of stakeholders in disaster risk". International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, I: 21, p: 35-43.
  6. Nagasaka, T. (2006). "New Mode of Risk Governance Enhanced by an e-communi