Dergiler / Solunum / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Retrospective Analysis of Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Respiratory Isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in a Chest Diseases Public Hospital

Dergi
Solunum
Sayfa
90–95
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The clinical significance of these findings is important in the selection of appropriate empirical treatment of serious P. aeruginosa infections.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Multidrug resistance is a major problem of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We aimed to determine the level of resistance to the antipseudomonal antibiotics, the change in the rates of antibiotic resistance over the years, and mortality rate during hospital stay.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The clinical significance of these findings is important in the selection of appropriate empirical treatment of serious P. aeruginosa infections.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Multidrug resistance is a major problem of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. We aimed to determine the level of resistance to the antipseudomonal antibiotics, the change in the rates of antibiotic resistance over the years, and mortality rate during hospital stay. Methods: The microbiology database of P. aeruginosa isolated from 3708 sputum and 485 bronchial lavage samples at Chest Diseases Public Hospital from January 2009 to December 2013 was retrospectively reviewed. Imipenem, amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam ceftazidime, and cefepime resistance rates of P. aeruginosa strains were determined. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the disk diffusion method, according to the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. P. aeruginosa was defined as resistant (resistance to at least one of the antipseudomonal antibiotics), and multidrug resistant (MDR) (resistance to three or more drugs of following classes: ?-lactam, carbapenem, aminoglycoside, and fluoroquinolone). Results: Five hundred and five P. aeruginosa isolates were tested. The antibiotic resistance rates were as follows; cefepime (26.7%), ceftazidime (23.2%), piperacillin (22.2%), imipenem (21.8%), piperacillin/tazobactam (19.2%), ciprofloxacin (17.4%), tobramycin (11.9%), and amikacin (7.3%). When compared 2009 and 2013, statistically significant reduction was observed in resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, and cefepime antibiotics. Among 505 strains, 12.1% were designated as being MDR. Out of 505 patients investigated, 34 (6.7%) died during the hospital stay. Conclusion: The clinical significance of these findings is important in the selection of appropriate empirical treatment of serious P. aeruginosa infections.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ŞİMŞEK, A., YAPICI, İ., TEMİZ, E., OCAK, İ., KOLSUZ, M. (2016). Retrospective Analysis of Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Respiratory Isolates of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in a Chest Diseases Public Hospital. Solunum, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 90–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/314250

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Blanc DS, Petignat C, Janin B, Bille J, Francioli P. Frequency and molecular diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa upon admission and during hospitalization: a prospective epidemiologic study. Clin Microbiol Infect 1998; 4: 242-7. [CrossRef] Pier GB, Ramphal R. Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 6nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005; 2: 587-615.
  2. Obritsch MD, Fish DN, MacLaren R, Jung R. Nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Epidemiology and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 25: 1353-64. [CrossRef] Chastre J, Trouillet JL. Problem pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter). Semin Respir Infect 2000; 15: 287-98. [CrossRef] Natonal Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standarts (2000): Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 5nd ed. Approved standards M7-A4. Nationa Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa. Carmeli Y, Troillet N, Eliopoulos GM, Samore MH. Emergence of antibiotic- resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different anti pseudomonal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 1379-82.
  3. Vahapoğlu H, Akhan SÇ. Pseudomanas aeruginosa ve diğer Pseudomonas türleri, "Wilke Topçu A, Söyletir G, Doğanay M editörler. Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Mikrobiyolojisi, Cilt 2, Etkenlere Göre Enfeksiyonlar, 3. baskı" kitabında s. 2175-86,
  4. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, İstanbul, 2008.
  5. Falagas ME, Koletsi PK, Bliziotis IA. The diversity of definitions of multidrug- resistant (MDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Med Microbiol 2006; 55: 1619-29. [CrossRef] Samporn S, Chuntima T, Thitiya Y, Chertask D. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of pseudomonas aeruginosa mucoid and non-mucoid type. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2004; 35: 893-94. Livermore DM. The impact of carbapenemases on antimicrobial development and therapy. Curr Opin Invest Drugs 2002; 3: 218-24.
  6. Göktaş U, Yaman G, Karahocagil MK, Bilici A, Katı İ, Berktaş M. Akdeniz anestezi yoğun bakım ünitesinde hastane enfeksiyonu etkenleri ve direnç profilinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Yoğun Bakım Derneği Derg 2010; 8: 13-7.
  7. Ertürk A, Çiçek AÇ, Köksal E, Köksal ZŞ, Özyurt S. Yoğun bakim ünitesinde yatan hastaların çeşitli klinik örneklerinden izole edilen mikroorganizmalar ve antibiyot