KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?

Kol Hareket Araştırma Testi İnmeli Hastalarda Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlığı Ön Gördürebilir mi?

Muhammed Nur OGUN
Ramazan KURUL
Sayfa
135–139
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition to the ARAT test, functional independence scales may be appropriate for the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To investigate the ability of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores to predict functional independence in the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions in stroke patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A total of 59 patients with stroke with a mean age of 61.10±9.12 were included in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition to the ARAT test, functional independence scales may be appropriate for the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To investigate the ability of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores to predict functional independence in the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions in stroke patients. Methods: A total of 59 patients with stroke with a mean age of 61.10±9.12 were included in this study. Forty-one (69.5%) of the patients were male, and 18 (30.5%) were female. After obtaining the demographic data of the patients who were followed up in the stroke outpatient clinic after the stroke, upper extremity functions were evaluated using ARAT test, and functional independence was evaluated with Performance Assessment of Self Care Skills (PASS) and Functional Independence Scale (FIM) tests. The data were retrospectively evaluated and recorded. Results: The mean stroke duration was 15.38±7.16 months. According to Spearman correlation test results, there was no correlation between ARAT and PASS (p=0.902), PASS-BADL (Basic activities of daily living) (p=0.480), PASS-IADL (Instrumental activities of daily living) (p=0.524) and between ARAT and FIM (p=0.451), FIM Motor (p=0.393), and FIM Cognitive (p=0.553). There was a weak correlation between the FIM and the PASS scores (r=0.278, p=0.033). Conclusion: ARAT scores routinely used in the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions were not correlated with functional independence. In addition to the ARAT test, functional independence scales may be appropriate for the evaluation of upper extremity motor functions.

Abstract

Amaç: İnmeli hastalarda üst ekstremite motor fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan Kol Hareket Araştırma Testi (ARAT) skorlarının fonksiyonel bağımsızlığı ön görebilme kapasitesini araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 61.10±9.12 olan toplam 59 inmeli hasta alındı. Hastaların 41’i (%69.5) erkek 18’i (%30.5) kadındı. İnme sonrası inme polikliniğinde takip edilen hastaların demografik bilgileri alındıktan sonra üst ekstremite fonksiyonları ARAT testi ve fonksiyonel bağımsızlıkları Kendine Bakım Becerilerin Performans Değerlendirmesi (PASS) ve Fonksiyonel Bağımsızlık Ölçeği (FIM) testleri ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama inme geçirme süreleri 15.38±7.16 ay olarak bulundu. Spearman korrelasyon testi sonuçlarına göre ARAT ve PASS arasında (p=0.902), PASS-BADL (temel günlük yaşam aktiviteleri) (p=0.480), PASS-IADL (enstrümental günlük yaşam aktiviteleri) (p=0.524) ARAT ve FIM (p=0.451), FIM Motor (p=0.393) ve FIM Cognitive (p=0.553). arasında korelasyon görülmedi). FIM ve PASS skorları arasında zayıf bir korelasyon vardı (r=0.275, p=0.033). Sonuç: Üst ekstremite motor fonksiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde rutin olarak kullanılan ARAT skorları fonksiyonel bağımsızlık ile korele olmadığı saptandı. Üst ekstremite motor fonskiyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde ARAT testine ek olarak fonksiyonel bağımsızlık ölçeklerinin kullanılması uygun olabilir

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OGUN, M. N., KURUL, R. (2020). Can Action Research Arm Test Predict Functional Independence in Addition to Motor Functions in Stroke Patients?. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 135–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/313983

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Mathers C, Fat DM, Boerma J. The global burden of disease: 2004 update: World Health Organization; 2008. Available at: https://www. who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf. Accessed Apr 11, 2020
  2. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 1980;58:113–30
  3. Sims NR, Muyderman H. Mitochondria, oxidative metabolism and cell death in stroke. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010;1802:80–91
  4. Bilir Kaya B, Süslü S. Role of Gender in the Quality of Life and Functional Status in Stroke Patients with Urinary Incontinence. South Clin Ist Euras 2019;30(1):77–82
  5. Levine DA, Morgenstern LB, Langa KM, Piette JD, Rogers MA, Karve SJ. Recent trends in cost-related medication nonadherence among stroke survivors in the United States. Ann Neurol 2013;73:180–8
  6. Sandercock P, Berge E, Dennis M, Forbes J, Hand P, Kwan J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:1–112
  7. Wainapel SF, Fast A. Alternative medicine and rehabilitation: a guide for practitioners. Demos Medical Publishing; 2003. p. 277–92
  8. Nomikos PA, Spence N, Alshehri MA. Test-retest reliability of physiotherapists using the action research arm test in chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 2018;30:1271–7
  9. Sheikh K. Disability scales: assessment of reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:245–9. 10. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Devillé WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369–75
  10. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH. Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing 1998;27:107–13
  11. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981;4:483–92
  12. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Sheu CF, Wu TS, Lin RT, Chen CH, et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2009;89:840–50
  13. Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2009;40:1386–91. 15.