Dergiler / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3

The Reconstructive Options for Lower Extremity Defects: 10-Year Retrospective Study

Alt Ekstremite Defektlerinin Kapatılmasında Rekonstrüktif Seçenekler: 10 Yıllık Geriye Dönük Çalışma

Sayfa
261–265
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Despite all the surgical developments, it should not be forgotten that the amputation might be inevitable and the methods preferred may not provide the best results in the long term when lower extremity function is considered.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Complications, functional and aesthetical results of patients, what kind of reconstructive methods were preferred, diversity in the surgical techniques which are preferred within years, advantages and disadvantages of different techniques with respect to each, were evaluated in patients who were operated in our clinic to determine our experience in the lower extremity soft tissue repair.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The techniques which are used for the reconstruction of 1017 soft tissue defects of the lower extremity, were evaluated retrospectively in between January 2004 and August 2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Despite all the surgical developments, it should not be forgotten that the amputation might be inevitable and the methods preferred may not provide the best results in the long term when lower extremity function is considered.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Complications, functional and aesthetical results of patients, what kind of reconstructive methods were preferred, diversity in the surgical techniques which are preferred within years, advantages and disadvantages of different techniques with respect to each, were evaluated in patients who were operated in our clinic to determine our experience in the lower extremity soft tissue repair. Methods: The techniques which are used for the reconstruction of 1017 soft tissue defects of the lower extremity, were evaluated retrospectively in between January 2004 and August 2017. According to archive scan results, patients’ age, gender, the etiology of the lower extremity defects, defect localization, the selected surgical method for closure of the defect, complications, the number of surgeries were determined. Results: In our study, 873 patients were included and 1017 defects were operated. Of patients 69.99% (n=611) were male, 30.01% of them (n=262) were female. The average age was 46.2 (7–85) years and it was evaluated that the most common etiologic cause was trauma. The feet were the predominantly affected sites among the defect areas. Graft application was the most preferred method of reconstruction among other methods for lower extremity tissue defects. Conclusion: The lower steps of the reconstructive ladder for the lower extremity reconstruction, are more preferred over the past 30 years. Despite all the surgical developments, it should not be forgotten that the amputation might be inevitable and the methods preferred may not provide the best results in the long term when lower extremity function is considered.

Abstract

Amaç: Alt ekstremite yumuşak doku onarımındaki deneyimlerimizi aktarmak amacıyla, kliniğimizde ameliyat edilen hastalarda tercih edilen kapatım yöntemleri, yıllar içerisinde seçilen cerrahi tekniklerdeki değişimler, farklı tekniklerin birbirlerine göre üstünlükleri, komplikasyonları, hastaların fonksiyonel ve estetik açıdan sonuçlarının ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2004 ve Ağustos 2017 tarihleri arasında alt ekstremitede oluşan 1017 yumuşak doku defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonunda kullanılan yöntemler geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Arşiv taraması sonucunda hastaların yaşı, cinsiyetı, alt ekstremite açık yarasının etiyolojisi, defektin yerleşim yeri, defekt kapatımında seçilen yöntem, komplikasyon ve geçirilen ameliyat sayısı belirlendi. Bulgular: Çalışmamıza 873 hasta dahil edilmiş ve 1017 defektin ameliyat edildiği tespit edilmiştir. Hastaların %69.99’u (n=611) erkek, %30.01’i (n=262) kadın olarak saptanmıştır. Ortalama yaş 46.2 (7–85) ve en sık etiyolojik neden travma olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Defekt alanları incelendiğinde en sık ayakta doku defekti nedeniyle hastaların opere edildiği görülmüştür. Tüm alt ekstremite doku defektlerinin rekonstrüksiyonunda kullanılan cerrahi yönteme bakıldığında greftin tercih edildiği tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Geçtiğimiz 30 yıl içerisinde alt esktremite rekonstrüksiyonunda rekonstrüktif merdivende alt basamaklara daha çok başvurulmuştur. Tüm bu gelişmelere rağmen fonksiyonu korumak için uygulanan çözümlerin uzun dönemde en iyi sonucu veremeyebileceği ve amputasyonun hasta için nadir de olsa kaçınılmaz olabileceği unutulmamalıdır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇİÇEK, Ç., DEMİRSEREN, M. E. (2019). The Reconstructive Options for Lower Extremity Defects: 10-Year Retrospective Study. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 3, 261–265. https://ajindex.com/articles/313037

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Thorne CH. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery (6th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 676–88
  2. Parrett BM, Pribaz JJ. Lower extremity reconstruction. Rev Med Clin Condes 2010;21:66–75
  3. Saleh Y, Wahebb B, Abd-Elaziz MA, El-Oteify M. A suggested algorithm for post-traumatic lower limb soft tissue reconstruction. Egypt J Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;1:87–96
  4. Medina ND, Kovach SJ, Levin LS. An evidence-based approach to lower extremity acute trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:926–31
  5. Roberts CS, Pape HC, Jones AL, Malkani AL, Rodriguez JL, Giannoudis PV. Damage control orthopaedics: evolving concepts in the treatment of patients who have sustained orthopaedic trauma. Instr Course Lect 2005;54:447–62
  6. Rajasekaran S, Naresh Babu J, Dheenadhayalan J, Shetty AP, Sundararajan SR, Kumar M, et al. A score for predicting salvage and outcome in Gustilo type-IIIA and type-IIIB open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1351–60
  7. McAndrew MP, Lantz BA. Initial care of massively traumatized lower extremities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;20–9
  8. Daecke W, Marzi I, Frank J. Reconstruction of lower extremity fractures with soft tissue defects. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2007;33:24–32
  9. Griffin M, Malahias M, Khan W, Hindocha S. Update on the management of open lower limb fractures. Open Orthop J 2012;6:571–7
  10. Cole JD, Ansel LJ, Schwartzberg R. A sequential protocol for management of severe open tibial fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;84–103
  11. Zhang G. Reversed anterolateral thigh island flap and myocutaneous flap transplantation. Chin Med J 1990;70:676–8 (in Chinese)
  12. Hollenbeck ST, Toranto JD, Taylor BJ, Ho TQ, Zenn MR, Erdmann D, et al. Perineal and lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:551e–63e
  13. Donski PK, Fogdestam I. Distally based fasciocutaneous flap from the sural region. A preliminary report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;17:191–6
  14. Ruan HJ, Cai PH, Schleich AR, Fan CY, Chai YM. The extended peroneal artery perforator flap for lower extremity reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:451–7
  15. Baumeister SP, Spierer R, Erdmann D, Sweis R, Levin LS, Germann GK. A realistic complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps in a multimorbid patient group. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:129–40
  16. Ceran C, Demirseren ME, Aksam E, Cicek C, Demiralp CO. Lateral malleolar region defects with exposed implants: proximally based peroneus brevis muscle flap. J Wound Care 2015;24:372–7