Dergiler / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

A validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale

Sayfa
220–227
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale has been determined to be a suitable and valid-reliable measurement tool for use in Turkish society

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale (ASC) adapted to Turkish.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This research is a methodological study of 200 people.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale has been determined to be a suitable and valid-reliable measurement tool for use in Turkish society
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale (ASC) adapted to Turkish. Methods: This research is a methodological study of 200 people. Data were collected from November to December 2018, through a social media account of a cancer-oriented association and those who had been diagnosed and treated for cancer for at least a year, at least primary school graduates and individuals over the age of 18 years. For validity analysis, language equivalence, scope validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used. For reliability, internal consistency, item-area and test-retest were used. Data were analyzed with SPSS V22.0 and LISREL 8.8 programs. Results: According to the exploratory factor analysis; the factor loads of the scale items and the total variance explained were sufficient, according to the confirmatory factor analysis the fit indexes were found to be at a desired level. For the reliability analysis; Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was highly reliable, each item represented the scale, according to item total score correlations each item was strongly or very strongly related to the scale and four weeks later the re-test given to the 50 survivors was found to be highly reliable. Conclusion: The Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale has been determined to be a suitable and valid-reliable measurement tool for use in Turkish society

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AK, P. S., VARDAR, O., BAŞKALE, H. A. (2020). A validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 220–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/308379

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9–29
  2. WHO. All cancers in 2018. Retrieved Marc 1, 2019, from https:// gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-factsheet.pdf
  3. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü. Türkiye Kanser İstatistikleri 2018. Retrieved March 3, 2020, from https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/istatistik/ Trkiye_Kanser_statistikleri_2015.pdf
  4. Sayın YY, Kanan N. Kanserde Psikososyal Yaklaşım. İstanbul Üniversitesi FNHYO Dergisi 2004;13:127–36
  5. Günüşen NP, İnan FŞ, Üstün B. Experiences of Turkish women with breast cancer during the treatment process and facilitating coping factors. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 2013;14:3143–9
  6. Serçekuş P, Başkale H. Living and coping with cancer: experiences of cancer blog users in Turkey. Holist Nurs Pract 2015;29:144–50
  7. Vardar O. Jinekolojik kanser tanısı alan kadınlar ve bakım veren aile üyelerinin deneyimleri [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2017
  8. Uchida M, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Sagawa R, Nakaguchi T, Endo C, et al. Patients' supportive care needs and psychological distress in advanced breast cancer patients in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011;41:530–6
  9. Bag B. Kanser hastalarında uzun dönemde görülen psikososyal sorunlar. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 2013;5:109–26
  10. Salci MA, Marcon SS. Coping with the specter of cancer. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2010;31:18–25. [Article in Portuguese] 11. Almeida SN, Elliott R, Silva ER, Sales CMD. Fear of cancer recurrence: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of patients' experiences. Clin Psychol Rev 2019;68:13–24
  11. National Cancer Institue. President's Cancer Panel. Living beyond cancer: finding a new balance. Retrieved March 01,2019, from
  12. American Cancer Society. Glossary: definitions & phonetic pronunciations: survior definitions Retrieved March 01, 2019, from https://www.cancer.org/content/cancer/en/cancer/ glossary.html?term=survivor
  13. National Cancer Institute. NCI dictionary of cancer terms: survivor definitions. 2018. Retrieved March 01, 2019, from https:// www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/ search?contains=false&q=survivor
  14. Matthews EE, Cook PF. Relationships among optimism, well-being, self-transcendence, coping, and social support in women during treatment for breast cancer. Psychooncology 2009;