The Turkish Version of Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale

Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: This study was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the “Pain Assessment In Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale”.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.82 and 0.85 for the test and re-test, respectively.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The PAINAD-TR scale can be used for the assessment and management of pain in non-communicative older adults with AD.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: This study was conducted to test the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the “Pain Assessment In Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale”. Methods: One hundred and six older adults with advanced dementia (AD) were recruited in the study. Detailed medical history and demographic data of the participants were recorded. Initially, the Turkish version of PAINAD (PAINAD-TR), which was prepared by means of “back-translation”, was applied. Along with this scale, Mini Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating scale, and Visual Analog Scale were also used. Results: The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.82 and 0.85 for the test and re-test, respectively. For the test-retest reliability of the PAINAD-TR scale, values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were 0.812 and 0.763-0.850 respectively. According to the results of a factor analysis carried out on the scale, a 2-domain structure was proved. Conclusion: The PAINAD-TR scale can be used for the assessment and management of pain in non-communicative older adults with AD.

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışma “İleri Demansta Ağrı Değerlendirme Ölçeği [Pain Assessment In Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale]’nin türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenirliliğini test etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntem: Yüz altı ileri demans (İD)’lı yaşlı birey çalışmaya dahil edildi. Olguların detaylı tıbbı hikayeleri ve demografik bilgileri kaydedildi. İlk olarak, “back-translation” sonucu elde edilen PAINAD’ın türkçe versiyonu (PAINAD-TR) kullanıldı. Bu skala ile birlikte, Mini mental durum testi, klinik demans derecelendirme ölçeği ve visual analog skalası kullanıldı. Ölçümler birbirinden bağımsız iki farklı kişi tarafından 2 haftalık aralarla tekrarlandı. Bulgular: Cronbach’s α katsayısı sırasıyla, test için 0,82 tekrar-test için 0,85 olarak bulunmuştur. PAINAD-TR skalasının test-tekrar test güvenilirliği için sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı değeri 0.812, %95 güven aralığı değeri ise 0.763-0.850 idi. Ölçek üzerinde yapılan bi faktör analizinin sonuçlarına göre, 2 alanlı bir yapı kanıtlandı. Sonuç: PAINAD-TR ölçeği iletişimi olmayan İD’li yaşlı erişkinlerde ağrı değerlendirmesi ve yönetimi için kullanılabilir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BÜYÜKTURAN, Ö., NAHARCI, M. İ., BÜYÜKTURAN, B., KIRDI, N., YETİŞ, A. (2018). The Turkish Version of Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) Scale. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3, 271–275. https://ajindex.com/articles/294441

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms, 2nd ed. Seattle, USA: IASP Press; 1994. Moncur CA. A postura do idoso. In: Guccione AA, editor. Fisioterapia geriátrica, 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2002. pp.251–263.
Valera GG, Carezzato NL, Vale FAC, Hortense P. Cultural adaptation of the scale Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia - PAINAD to Brazil. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2014;48:462–468. [CrossRef] Herr K. Pain assessment strategies in older patients. J Pain 2011;12(3 Suppl 1):S3–S13. [CrossRef] McAuliffe L, Nay R, O’Donnell M, Fetherstonhaugh D. Pain assessment in older people with dementia: literature review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:2–10. [CrossRef] Horgas AL, Elliott AF. Pain assessment and management in persons with dementia. Nurs Clin North Am 2004;39:593–606. [CrossRef] Hurley AC, Volicer BJ, Hanrahan PA, Houde S, Volicer L. Assessment of discomfort in advanced Alzheimer patients. Res Nurs Health 1992;15:369– 377. Feldt KS. The checklist of nonverbal pain indicators (CNPI). Pain Manag Nurs 2000;1:13–21. [CrossRef] Villanueva MR, Smith TL, Erickson JS, Lee AC, Singer CM. Pain assessment for the dementing elderly (PADE): reliability and validity of a new measure. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4:1–8. [CrossRef] Abbey J, Piller N, De Bellis A, Esterman A, Parker D, Giles L, Lowcay B. The Abbey pain scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementia. Int J Palliat Nurs 2004;10:6–13. [CrossRef] Fuchs-Lacelle S, Hadjistavropoulos T. Development and preliminary validation of the pain assessment checklist for seniors with limited ability to communicate (PACSLAC). Pain Manag Nurs 2004;5:37–49.
Snow AL, Weber JB, O’Malley KJ, Cody M, Beck C, Bruera E, Ashton C, Kunik ME. NOPPAIN: a nursing assistant-administered pain assessment instrument for use in dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;17:240–246. [CrossRef] Warden V, Hurley AC, Volicer L. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2003;4:9–15. [CrossRef] Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs 1997;23:293–297.
Zwakhalen SM, Hamers JP, Berger MP. The psychometric quality and clinical usefulness of three pain assessment tools for elderly people with dementia. Pain 2006;126:210–220. [CrossRef] Bjoro K, Bergen K, Herr K, FAAN R