Dergiler / Mugla Journal of Science and Technology / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF BLENDING RATIO ON THE CO-GASIFICATION OF HIGH ASH COAL AND BIOMASS IN A FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIER USING MACHINE LEARNING

Sayfa
1–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The prediction performance of the proposed techniques on both datasets is evaluated and practical usability is discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Co-gasification is a process that converts coal and biomass into useful products, such as syngas.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Even though previous studies result in successful modelling for specific cases, limited selection of methods and lack of implementation of cross-validation techniques causes insufficiency to explain unbiased performance evaluations and up-scale usability of the methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The prediction performance of the proposed techniques on both datasets is evaluated and practical usability is discussed.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:gasification · co-gasificiation · machine learning

Abstract

Co-gasification is a process that converts coal and biomass into useful products, such as syngas. Analytical and numerical approaches for modeling co-gasification process either require enormous amount of time or make a lot of assumptions which reduce consistency of the models in practical applications. Artificial Intelligence based modeling methods are used to simulate and to make predictions of outcomes of the co-gasification process. Even though previous studies result in successful modelling for specific cases, limited selection of methods and lack of implementation of cross-validation techniques causes insufficiency to explain unbiased performance evaluations and up-scale usability of the methods. In this paper, six different regression methods are employed to predict outputs of co-gasification process using a dataset containing 56 observations. Moreover, the original dataset is randomly resampled so that each model’s generalization ability is further assessed. The prediction performance of the proposed techniques on both datasets is evaluated and practical usability is discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ELMAZ, F., YÜCEL, Ö., MUTLU, A. Y. (2019). EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF BLENDING RATIO ON THE CO-GASIFICATION OF HIGH ASH COAL AND BIOMASS IN A FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIER USING MACHINE LEARNING. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/293944

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. (Online) BP, (2018). Statistical Review of World Energy: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/excel/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-all-data.xlsx
  2. N.L. Panwar, S.C. Kaushik, Surendra Kothari,Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,Volume 15,Issue 3,2011,Pages 1513-1524.
  3. Srivastava, Tushar. "Renewable energy (gasification)." Adv. Electron. Electr. Eng 3 (2013): 1243-1250.
  4. Ali Yener Mutlu, Ozgun Yucel, An artificial intelligence based approach to predicting syngas composition for downdraft biomass gasification, Energy, Volume 165, Part A 2018, Pages: 895-901. Natalia Kamińska-Pietrzak, Adam Smoliński, Selected Environmental Aspects of Gasification and Co-Gasification of Various Types of Waste,Journal Akia, Mandana & Yazdani, Farshad & Motaee, Elahe & Han, Dezhi & Arandiyan, Hamid. (2014). A review on conversion of biomass to biofuel by nanocatalysts. Biofuel research journal. 1. 16-25.
  5. Ud Din, Zia and Zainal, Z.A., (2016), Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, issue C, p. 1356-1376.
  6. Karayılmazlar S, Saraçoğlu N, Çabuk Y, Kurt R (2011). Biyokütlenin Türkiye’de Enerji Üretiminde Değerlendirilmesi. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(19), 63-75.
  7. Milad Arabloo, Alireza Bahadori, Mohammad M. Ghiasi, Moonyong Lee, Ali Abbas, Sohrab Zendehboudi,A novel modeling approach to optimize oxygen–steam ratios in coal gasification process,Fuel,Volume 153,2015,Pages 1-5.
  8. Seo H-K, Park S, Lee J, Kim M, Chung S-W, Chung J-H, et al. Effects of operating factors in the coal gasification reaction. Korean J Chem Eng 2011;28:1851–8. Kalina J. Retrofitting of municipal coal fired heating plant with integrated biomass gasification gas turbine based cogeneration block. Energy Convers Manage 2010;51:1085–92. Simultaneous Steam Reforming of Tar and Steam Gasification of Char from the Pyrolysis of Potassium-Loaded Woody Biomass Tsukasa Sueyasu, Tomoyuki Oike, Aska Mori, Shinji Kudo, Koyo Norinaga, and Jun-ichiro Hayashi Energy & Fuels 2012 26 (1), 199-208.
  9. Guo B, Li D, Cheng C, Lu Z, Shen Y. Simulation of biomass gasification with a hybrid neural network model. Bioresour Technol 2001;76(2). Maria Puig-Arnavat, J. Alfredo Hernández, Joan Carles Bruno, Alberto Coronas, Artificial neural network models for biomass gasification in fluidized bed gasifiers, Biomass and Bioenergy,Volume 49,2013,Pages 279-289. Daya Sha