KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Dynamic assessment versus static assessment: A study of reading comprehension ability in Iranian EFL learners

Behzad Nazari
Saeed Mansouri
Sayfa
0–156
Yayın Tarihi
2014-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The statistical data analysis revealed that DA was statistically more significant and effective for the low skilled readers than static assessment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz This study extends traditional or static assessment of reading comprehension in foreign language contexts and applies dynamic assessment (DA) to the development of learners’ reading ability.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To homogenize the research population (N= 250), an Oxford Placement Test (OPT) was administered.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The statistical data analysis revealed that DA was statistically more significant and effective for the low skilled readers than static assessment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Assessment · dynamic assessment · static assessment

Özet

Öz This study extends traditional or static assessment of reading comprehension in foreign language contexts and applies dynamic assessment (DA) to the development of learners’ reading ability. To homogenize the research population (N= 250), an Oxford Placement Test (OPT) was administered. On the basis of the test results, the population was sorted into three groups of reading-low, reading-mid, and reading-high students. The participants of this study were a sample of 30 participants with the lowest level of reading comprehension proficiency randomly assigned into two groups of control and experimental. This study was conducted in the Nosrat Institute, located in Kermanshah Province in 2012. In order to determine their current zone or level of reading proficiency, a TOEFL reading comprehension pre-test was administered to both groups. Afterwards, DA training was applied to the EG in 9 successive 80-minute sessions on reading comprehension, Unlike EG, static assessment was applied to the CG. In the end, another TOEFL reading comprehension post-test was administered to the research groups to measure their reading comprehension performance level after their treatment. The statistical data analysis revealed that DA was statistically more significant and effective for the low skilled readers than static assessment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Nazari, B., Mansouri, S. (2014). Dynamic assessment versus static assessment: A study of reading comprehension ability in Iranian EFL learners. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 0–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/29356

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Abbott, S. P., Reed, E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V.W. (1997). Year-long balanced reading/writing tutorial: A design experiment used for dynamic assessment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(3), 249-263. DOI: 10.2307/1511311 Aljaafreh, A., & J. P. Lantolf. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
  2. Bailey, K. (1996). Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing. Language Testing 13(3), 257–279. DOI: 10.1177/026553229601300303 Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 65–83. DOI: 10.1097/00011363-200501000-00007
  3. Bransford, J. D., Delclos, V. R., Vye, N. J., Burns, M. S., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1987). State of the art and future directions. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 479-496). New York: Guilford Press. DOI: 10.1177/002221948902200303 Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data (Technical Report No. 361). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED269735) Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–140). New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Cioffi, G., & Carney, J. J. (1983). The dynamic assessment of reading disabilities. Reading Teacher, 36, 764–768.
  5. Ellis, R., (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193-220. DOI: 10.1177/136216880000400302 Feuerstein, R. (1998). The theory of mediated learning experience: About human as a modifiable Being. Jerusalem: Ministry of Defense Publications (in Hebrew). Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). Dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  6. Hamers, J., Pennings, A., & Guthke, J. (1994). Training-based assessment of school achievement. Learning and Instruction, 4, 347–360.
  7. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and ed