Dergiler / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2017 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

The Probable Prevalence and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Specific Learning Disorder in Primary School Children in Edirne

Sayfa
343–349
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The relationships between the probable prevalence rates and sociodemographic data were discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: The aim of this study was to research the probable prevalence of Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) in primary school children in Edirne City and the relationships with their sociodemographic characteristics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The sample of our study was composed of 2,174 children who were educated in primary schools in second, third, and fourth grades in the academic year 2013–2014 in Edirne City.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The relationships between the probable prevalence rates and sociodemographic data were discussed.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2013–2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: The aim of this study was to research the probable prevalence of Specific Learning Disorder (SLD) in primary school children in Edirne City and the relationships with their sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: The sample of our study was composed of 2,174 children who were educated in primary schools in second, third, and fourth grades in the academic year 2013–2014 in Edirne City. The teachers and parents of these children were given Specific Learning Difficulties Symptom Scale, Learning Disabilities Symptoms Checklist (teacher and parent forms), and sociodemographic data forms to fill in. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk factors for SLD. Results: Our study revealed that the probable prevalence of SLD was 13.6%; 17% for boys and 10.4% for girls. Reading impairment was 3.6%, writing impairment was 6.9%, and mathematic impairment was 6.5%. We determined that consanguineous marriages, low income, history of neonatal jaundice were found as risks for SLD; born by caesarean, developmental delay of walking, and history of neonatal jaundice were found as risks for mathematic impairment. A history of learning difficulties of parents was a risk factor for forming SLD and subtypes. Conclusion: Our findings were consistent with other study results about the prevalence of SLD. The relationships between the probable prevalence rates and sociodemographic data were discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖRKER, I., BOZATLI, L., KORKMAZLAR, Ü., KARADAĞ, M. Y., CEYLAN, C., SÖĞÜT, C., AYKUTLU, H. C., SUBAY, B., TURAN, N. (2017). The Probable Prevalence and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Specific Learning Disorder in Primary School Children in Edirne. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 343–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/292838

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM V). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013
  2. Silver LB. Developmental Learning Disorder. Lewis M, editör. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Textbook içinde
  3. Baskı. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002; s.621-629
  4. Pastor PN, Reuben CA. Attention deficit disorder and learning disability: United States, 1997-98. Vital Health Stat 2002; 206:1-12
  5. Yao B, Wu HR. Risk factors of learning disabilities in Chinese children in Wuhan. Biomed Environ Sci 2003; 16:392-397
  6. Rutter M, Caspi A, Fergusson D, Horwood IJ, Goodman R, Maughan B, Moffitt TE, Meltzer H, Carroll J. Sex differences in developmental reading disability: new findings from 4 epidemiological studies. JAMA 2004; 291:2007-2012. [CrossRef] 6. Moll K, Kunze S, Neuhoff N, Bruder J, Schulte-Körne G. Spesific Learning Disorder: Prevalance and Gender Differences. PLoS ONE 2014; 9:1-8. [CrossRef] 7. Korkmazlar Ü. 6-11 Yaş İlkokul Çocuklarında Özel Öğrenme Bozukluğu ve Tanı Yöntemleri. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, 1992
  7. Erman Ö. Öğrenme Bozukluğu ve Dikkat Eksikliği Aşırı Hareketlilik Bozukluğu Olgularının Nöropsikolojik ve Nörofizyolojik Yöntem İle İncelenmesi. AÜ Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara, 1997
  8. Korkmazlar Ü. Özel Öğrenme Bozukluğu (6-11 yaş ilkokul çocuklarında özel öğrenme bozukluğu ve tanı yöntemleri). İstanbul: Taç Ofset; 1993
  9. Rutter M, Yule W. The concept of specific reading retardation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1975; 16:181-197. [CrossRef] 11. Dupaul GJ, Stoner G. ADHD in the schools: Assessment and intervention strategies New York: Guilford Press; 2003
  10. Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, Biederman J, Rohde LA. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:942-948. [CrossRef] 13. Choudhary MG, Jain A, Chahar CK, Singhal AK. A case control study on spesific learning disorders in school going children in Bikaner City. Indian J Pediatr 2012; 79:1477-1481. [CrossRef] 14. Dhanda A, Jagawat T. Prevalance and Pattern of Learning Disabilities in School Children. Delhi Psychiatry Journal 2013; 16:386-390
  11. Mogasale VV, Patil VD, Patil NM, Mogasale V. Prevalance of spesific learning disabilities among primary school children in a South Indian City. Indian J Pediatr 2012; 79