KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

BENDING STRESS ANALYSIS OF AXIALLY LAYERED FUNCTIONALLY GRADED BEAMS

SAVAŞ EVRAN
Sayfa
390–398
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The numerical results show that the increasing of the layer levels increases the bending stress and percent contributions of Layer 1, Layer 2, Layer 3 and Layer 4 on the bending stress were obtained as 1.12%, 11.83%, 29.54% and 57.48%, respectively.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the bending stress analysis of axially layered functionally graded beams subjected to their own weight were evaluated under clamped-free (C-F) boundary condition.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The beams have four layers and each layer consist of different aluminium (Al)/monotungsten carbide (WC) systems based on increasing of the 6% WC.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The numerical results show that the increasing of the layer levels increases the bending stress and percent contributions of Layer 1, Layer 2, Layer 3 and Layer 4 on the bending stress were obtained as 1.12%, 11.83%, 29.54% and 57.48%, respectively.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In this study, the bending stress analysis of axially layered functionally graded beams subjected to their own weight were evaluated under clamped-free (C-F) boundary condition. The beams have four layers and each layer consist of different aluminium (Al)/monotungsten carbide (WC) systems based on increasing of the 6% WC. The layer positions in the beams were performed based on Taguchi L16 (4*4) orthogonal array design. The layers were considered as control factors and each layer has four levels. The analysis of signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios were used to obtain the optimum layer levels. Analyses were performed using finite element software ANSYS. In addition, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the important levels and percent contributions of the layers on the responses. The numerical results show that the increasing of the layer levels increases the bending stress and percent contributions of Layer 1, Layer 2, Layer 3 and Layer 4 on the bending stress were obtained as 1.12%, 11.83%, 29.54% and 57.48%, respectively.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EVRAN, S. (2018). BENDING STRESS ANALYSIS OF AXIALLY LAYERED FUNCTIONALLY GRADED BEAMS. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 390–398. https://ajindex.com/articles/290278

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. http://technology.infomine.com/reviews/comminution (erişim tarihi 03.03.2017).
  2. CROWSON, P., “Some Observations on Copper Yields and Ore Grades”, Resources Policy, 37, 1, 59-72, 2012.
  3. ALTUN, O., BENZER, H., ENDERLE, U., “Effects of Operating Parameters on the Efficiency of Dry Stirred Milling”, Minerals Engineering, 43-44, 58-66, 2013.
  4. GAO, M., YOUNG, M., ALLUM, P., “Isa Mill Fine Grinding Technology and Its Industrial Applications at Mt. Isa Mines”, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, 171-188.
  5. Ottawa, Canada, 2002.
  6. AYDOGAN, N., ERGUN, L., BENZER, H., “High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR) Applications in the Cement Industry”, Minerals Engineering, 19, 130-139, 2006.
  7. ALTUN, D., BENZER, H., AYDOGAN, N., GEROLD, C., “Operational Parameters Affecting the Vertical Roller Mill Performance”, Minerals Engineering 103-104, 67-71, 2017.
  8. DUNDAR, H., BENZER, H., AYDOGAN, N.A., ALTUN, O., TOPRAK, N.A., OZCAN, O., EKSI, D., SARGIN, A., “Simulation Assisted Capacity Improvement of Cement Grinding Circuit: Case Study Cement Plant”, Minerals Engineering, 24, 205–210, 2011.
  9. ALTUN, O., “Simulation Aided Flow Sheet Optimization of a Cement Grinding Circuit by Considering the Quality Measurements”, Powder Technology, 301, 1242-1251, 2016.
  10. UMUCU, Y., DENİZ, V., BOZKURT, V., ÇAĞLAR, F., “The Evaluation of Grinding Process Using Artificial Neural Network, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 146, 46–53, 2016.
  11. DELGADILLO, J.A., VALDIVIESO, A., TELLO, A., “Optimization of a Grinding and Classification Circuit of a Magnetite Ore Processing Plant Through Computer Simulation”, Minerals and Metallurgical Processing, 25, 223-228, 2008.
  12. FUERSTENAU, D.W., PHATAK, P.B., KAPUR, A.Z.M., ABOUZEID, C., “Simulation of the Grinding of Coarse/Fine (Heterogeneous) Systems in a Ball Mill”, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 99, 32– 38, 2011.
  13. TÜRK STANDARTLARI, TS 7700, “Öğütme İş İndeksi Tayini”. LYNCH, A.J., “Mineral Crushing and Grinding Circuits”, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, The Netherlands, 1977.
  14. EKSI, D., BENZER, H., SARGIN, A., GENC, O., “A New Method for Determination of Fine Particle Breakage”, Minerals Engineering, 24, 216-220, 2011.
  15. ALTUN, O., BENZER, H., “Selection and Mathematical Modelling of High Efficiency Air Classifiers”, Powder Technology, 264, 1-8, 2014.
  16. NAPIER-MUNN, T.J., MORRELL, S., MORRISON, R.D., KOJOVIC, T., “Mineral Comminution Circuits-Their Operation and Optimization”, Brisbane: JKMRC Monograph Series in