Dergiler / Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Flow Cytometry Results of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients at Diagnosis and Relapse

Akut Miyeloid Lo semili Hastaların Tanı ve Relaps Do nemindeki Akım Sitometri Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması

Sayfa
404–411
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Antigen changes at relapse should be kept in mind in the minimal residual disease era.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), leukemic cells become undetectable after chemotherapy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients diagnosed between September 2002 and November 2016 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Antigen changes at relapse should be kept in mind in the minimal residual disease era.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2002 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), leukemic cells become undetectable after chemotherapy. Nevertheless, leukemia may subsequently relapse due to minimal residual disease (MRD). Flow cytometric monitoring of MRD is prognostically informative. However immunophenotypic shifts at relapse is possible and may limit flow cytometric MRD-testing. Our objective was to evaluate the antigen changes in our AML patients. Patients diagnosed between September 2002 and November 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Bone marrow samples were collected at diagnosis and relapse from 40 patients with de novo (n=34) or secondary (n=6) AML, aged 19 to 77 years. Bone marrow samples were collected into tubes containing K3EDTA. Phycoerhtyrine (PE) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (eBioscience and BD Bioscience, San Jose, California) surface antigens were used according to the routine panel used in our laboratory. Analyses were done according to CD45 SSC gating strategy by Becton Dickinson FACSCalibur device. Overall, 34 of 40 (85%) cases showed changes (gain and/or loss of antigen) of at least one marker (n=10). Antigen changes were observed in 2 (n=7), 3 (n=6), 4 (n=6), 5 (n=4) or 6 (n=1) antigens in other patients. Antigen changes were found in 16 of 18 antigens (88.9%) totally. CD20 and CD45 were the only antigens with no change. Patients with AML demonstrate a high frequency of immunophenotypic shift at relapse. Antigen changes at relapse should be kept in mind in the minimal residual disease era.

Abstract

Akut miyeloid lösemi (AML)li çoğu hastada lösemik hücreler kemoterapi sonrası kaybolur. Ancak minimal kalıntı hastalık (MKH) nedeniyle lösemi nüksü gözlenebilir. MKH’nin akım sitometrik olarak takibi prognostik açıdan bilgi sağlar. Fakat relaps anında immünfenotipik kaymalar olabilir ve akım sitometri ile MKH değerlendirilmesini kısıtlayabilir. Bu çalışmada AML hastalarındaki antijen değişikliklerinin saptanması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada Eylül 2002 ve Kasım 2016 arasında AML tanısı alan 19-77 yaş arası geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Kemik iliği örnekleri tanı ve relaps anında elde edildi. Hastaların 34’ü de novo, 6’sı sekonder AML idi. Kemik iliği örnekleri K3EDTA içeren tüplere alındı. Phycoerhtyrine (PE) ve fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (eBioscience and BD Bioscience, San Jose, California) yüzey antijenleri laboratuvarımızda kullanılan rutin panele göre kullanıldı. Analizler CD45 kapılama stratejisine göre Becton Dickinson FACSCalibur cihazı ile yapıldı. Kırk hastanın 34’ünde (%85) en az 1 antijende değişiklik (antijen kazanımı ve/veya kaybı) mevcuttu (n=10). Antijen değişiklikleri 2 (n=7), 3 (n=6), 4 (n=6), 5 (n=4) ya da 6 (n=1) antijende gözlendi. Antijen değişiklikleri 18 antijenin 16’sında (%88.9) saptandı. Hiçbir hastada değişiklik gözlenmeyen antijenler sadece CD20 ve CD45’ti. AML’li hastalarda relaps sırasında immünfenotipik kayma sıklığı yüksektir. MKH değerlendirilirken relapsta gelişen antigen değişiklikleri göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GUNDUZ, E., TEKE, H. U., ANDIÇ, N. (2020). Comparison of Flow Cytometry Results of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients at Diagnosis and Relapse. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 404–411. https://ajindex.com/articles/287751

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Coustan-Smith E, Campana D. Should evaluation for minimal residual disease be routine in acute myeloid leukemia? Curr Opin Hematol. 2013;20:86–92
  2. Kayser S, Walter RB, Stock W, Schlenk RF. Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia--current status and future perspectives. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2015;10:132–44
  3. Araki D, Wood BL, Othus M, et al, Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: time to move toward a minimal residual disease-based definition of complete remission? J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:329–36
  4. Grimwade D, Vyas P, Freeman S. Assessment of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Opin Oncol.2010;22:656–63
  5. Krönke J, Schlenk RF, Jensen KO, et al, Monitoring of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the German-Austrian acute myeloid leukemia study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2709–16
  6. Inaba H, Coustan-Smith E, Cao X, et al,Comparative analysis of different approaches to measure treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3625–32
  7. Buccisano F, Maurillo L, Del Principe MI, et al,. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;119:332–41
  8. Terwijn M, van Putten WL, Kelder A, et al, High prognostic impact of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the HOVON/SAKK AML 42A study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3889–97
  9. Walter RB, Buckley SA, Pagel JM, Significance of minimal residual disease before myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for AML in first and second complete remission. Blood. 2013;122:1813–21
  10. Ivey A, Hills RK, Simpson MA, UK National Cancer Research Institute AML Working Group. Assessment of minimal residual disease in standard-risk AML. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:422–33
  11. Taub JW, Berman JN, Hitzler JK, Sorrell AD, Lacayo NJ, Mast K, Head D, Raimondi S, Hirsch B, Ge Y, Gerbing RB, Wang YC, Alonzo TA, Campana D, Coustan-Smith E, Mathew P, Gamis AS. Improved outcomes for myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group AAML0431 trial. Blood. 2017;129:3304–13
  12. Hourigan CS, Gale RP, Gormley NJ, Ossenkoppele GJ, Walter RB. Measurable residual disease testing in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2017;31:1482– 90
  13. Buldini B, Rizzati F, Masetti R, et al. Prognostic significance of flow-cytometry evaluation of minimal residual disease in ch