Dergiler / Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension, retention on learning and self-efficacy perception

Karşılıklı öğretimin okuduğunu anlamaya, öğrenme kalıcılığına ve öz yeterlik algısına etkisi

Sayfa
493–522
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The students in the experimental group expressed that they were pleased to have the opportunity to lead their friends, to have a say in guiding the lesson, this technique facilitated their understanding of the texts they read and it provided them with a group work environment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out to test the effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension skills, learning retention and self-efficacy perception of reading comprehension.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Research was conducted in 4th grade Turkish lessons of a primary school located in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey with experimental and control groups of 25 randomly assigned students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The students in the experimental group expressed that they were pleased to have the opportunity to lead their friends, to have a say in guiding the lesson, this technique facilitated their understanding of the texts they read and it provided them with a group work environment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This study was carried out to test the effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension skills, learning retention and self-efficacy perception of reading comprehension. Research was conducted in 4th grade Turkish lessons of a primary school located in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey with experimental and control groups of 25 randomly assigned students. Experimental method was used in the research and findings were supported with qualitative data. Data were collected through the Reading Comprehension Skills Achievement Test, Self-efficacy Perception Scale for Reading Comprehension and Student Interview Form, each developed by the researchers. According to the findings of the research, there was a significant difference between students in the experimental group where the reciprocal teaching technique was implemented and students in the control group where the traditional teaching process was continued in terms of the achievement level and retention scores of the reading comprehension in favor of the experimental group. However, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of self-efficacy levels. The students in the experimental group expressed that they were pleased to have the opportunity to lead their friends, to have a say in guiding the lesson, this technique facilitated their understanding of the texts they read and it provided them with a group work environment.

Abstract

Bu araştırma karşılıklı öğretim tekniğinin ilkokulda okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin gelişmesine, kalıcılığa ve okuduğunu anlama öz yeterlik algısına etkisini test etme amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma, Türkiye’de İç Anadolu Bölgesinde bulunan bir ilkokulunun 4. sınıf Türkçe derslerinde, yansız atama yoluyla elde edilen deney ve kontrol grubu olmak üzere yirmi beşer öğrenciden oluşan iki grupla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada deneysel yöntem kullanılmış olup, nitel verilerle de bulgular desteklenmiştir. Veriler, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen Okuduğunu Anlama Becerileri Başarı Testi, Okuduğunu Anlamaya İlişkin Öz Yeterlik Algısı Ölçeği ve Öğrenci Görüşme Formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre karşılıklı öğretim tekniğinin uygulandığı deney grubundaki öğrenciler ile geleneksel öğretim sürecinin devam ettirildiği kontrol grubundaki öğrenciler arasında okuduğunu anlamaya ilişkin başarı düzeyi ve kalıcılık puanları arasında deney grubu lehine anlamlı bir fark bulunurken, öz yeterlik düzeyleri arasında anlamlı fark gözlenmemiştir. Karşılıklı öğretim tekniğinin uygulandığı deney grubunda yer alan öğrenciler karşılıklı öğretim tekniğinin diğer arkadaşlarına liderlik etmelerine fırsat vermesinden memnun olduklarını, dersi yönlendirme konusunda söz sahibi olmalarını sağlamasının onlara keyif verdiğini, bu tekniğin, okudukları metinleri anlamalarını kolaylaştırdığını ve grupla çalışma ortamı sağlamasının kendilerine katkı getirdiğini ifade etmişlerdir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KULA, S. S., BUDAK, Y. (2020). The effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension, retention on learning and self-efficacy perception. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 493–522. https://ajindex.com/articles/285088

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Acat, M.B. (1996). The level of relationship between reading difficulties and reading comprehension skills.Unpublished master thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  2. Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171. Alvermann, D., & Earle, J. (2003). Comprehension instruction. In A. P. Sweet & C. Snow (Ed.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 12-30). New York: Guilford. Ateş, S. (2006).The effect of visuals in primary school fourth grade texts on reading comprehension and summarization. Unpublished master thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  3. Ateş, S., & Akyol, H. (2013).The evaluation of Turkish language arts course wıth regard to comprehension instruction.Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 11(3), 268-300.
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215
  5. Brady, P. L. (1990). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students through reciprocal teaching and semantic mapping strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene. Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983).The develoment of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
  6. Bruce, M. E., & Robinson, G. L. (2000). Effectiveness of a metacognitive reading program for poor readers. Issues In Educational Research, 10(1), 1-20.
  7. Budak, Y. (2016). Temel kavramlar. In Y. Budak (Ed.), Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri (pp. 1-26). Ankara:
  8. Pegem. Coolican, H. (2009). Research methods and statistics in psychology. London, United Kingdom: Hodder. Cooper, T., & Greive, C. (2009).The effectiveness of the methods of reciprocal teaching. Teach, 3(1), 45- 52. Çelenk, S. (2003).The relationship between school-family cooperation and reading comprehension achievement. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 24, 33-39.
  9. Çelik, S.; Şenocak, E.; Bayrakçeken, S.; Taşkesenligil, Y., & Doymuş, K. (2005).A review on active learning strategies. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 155-185.
  10. Çıkrıkçı, S. S. (2008). Development of primary school students summarizing skill. Dil Dergisi, 141, 19-35.
  11. Çiftçi, Ö. & Temizyürek, F. (2008).Measurement understanding of reading skills in 5th classes of primary schools. Mustafa Kemal Journal of University Social Sciences Institute, 5(9), 109-129.
  12. Dermody, M. (1988). Metacognitive strategies for development of reading