KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2015 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

The role of theory in pedagogical grammar: A Cognitive + Communicative approach

David NEWBY
Sayfa
13–34
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this paper, key aspects of grammar-related theory are discussed; at the same time, a theoretical model of pedagogical grammar is presented – Cognitive+Communicative Grammar – which is based on insights from Cognitive Linguistics and Communicative language teaching and which provides a comprehensive framework on the basis of which the central tasks of pedagogical grammar – objective setting, rule formulation, exercises and activities design - can be addressed in a principled way.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:One of the most controversial areas of modern language teaching is that of pedagogical grammar.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There is little consensus on what methodology should be applied in order to facilitate grammar acquisition; as a result, in classrooms throughout the world, grammar is taught in traditional ways which lack a solid theoretical underpinning.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this paper, key aspects of grammar-related theory are discussed; at the same time, a theoretical model of pedagogical grammar is presented – Cognitive+Communicative Grammar – which is based on insights from Cognitive Linguistics and Communicative language teaching and which provides a comprehensive framework on the basis of which the central tasks of pedagogical grammar – objective setting, rule formulation, exercises and activities design - can be addressed in a principled way.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pedagogical grammar · communicative · cognitive

Abstract

One of the most controversial areas of modern language teaching is that of pedagogical grammar. There is little consensus on what methodology should be applied in order to facilitate grammar acquisition; as a result, in classrooms throughout the world, grammar is taught in traditional ways which lack a solid theoretical underpinning. This is partly due to the fact that applied linguists have given insufficient attention to various facets of pedagogical grammar and to addressing certain key issues in grammar teaching. In this paper, key aspects of grammar-related theory are discussed; at the same time, a theoretical model of pedagogical grammar is presented – Cognitive+Communicative Grammar – which is based on insights from Cognitive Linguistics and Communicative language teaching and which provides a comprehensive framework on the basis of which the central tasks of pedagogical grammar – objective setting, rule formulation, exercises and activities design - can be addressed in a principled way.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NEWBY, D. (2015). The role of theory in pedagogical grammar: A Cognitive + Communicative approach. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 13–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/284934

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Achard, M. (2004). Grammatical instruction in the natural approach: A cognitive grammar view. In M. Achard, & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp. 166-194). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Achard, M., & Niemeier, S. (Eds.). (2004). Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies, & Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 501-523). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Broccias, C. (2008). Cognitive linguistic theories of grammar and grammar teaching. In S. De Knop, & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar (pp. 67-90). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Chalker, S. (1994). Pedagogical grammar: Principles and problems. In M. Bygate, A. Tonkyn, & E. Willimas (Eds.), Grammar and the language teacher (pp. 31-44). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  2. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Modern Languages Division/ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. De Knop, S., & De Rycker, T. (2008). (Eds.). Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DeKeyser, R. M. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Dirven, R. (1990). Pedagogical grammar. Language Teaching, 23(1), 1-18. http://doi.org/d98vb6
  6. Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (33-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51. Supplement 1, 1-46.
  8. Ellis, R. (2002). The place of grammar instruction in second/foreign language curriculum. In E. Hinkel, & S. Fotos (Eds.) New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 17-34).
  9. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Fotos, S., & Nassaji, H. (Eds.) (2007). Form-focused Instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Goswami, U. (2008). Principle o