KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2017 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Giving Class Averages: Is It Worth It?

Adrian LEİS
Matthew WİLSON
Sayfa
37–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thestudy used a Pretest-Posttest design, with the results of an analysis of variance suggesting there to be nostatistically significant difference (p = .77) between the Idio-comparative Group and Give-average Group.The authors suggest the Idio-comparative approach as one to be considered by language teachers in order to assist with building and preserving the confidence of the students participating in the class.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to test a scoring method for regular testing proposed by the authors whichprovides feedback on test results to each student based upon his or her increases or decreases with theprevious test score (hereafter, Idio-comparative marking).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The authors compared the Idio-comparativescoring system with a regular ‘individual result together with class average’ method in an eight-weeklong quasi-experimental study conducted with 52 first-year Japanese university students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thestudy used a Pretest-Posttest design, with the results of an analysis of variance suggesting there to be nostatistically significant difference (p = .77) between the Idio-comparative Group and Give-average Group.The authors suggest the Idio-comparative approach as one to be considered by language teachers in order to assist with building and preserving the confidence of the students participating in the class.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:L2 Learning Motivation · Self-worth Theory · Assessment

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test a scoring method for regular testing proposed by the authors whichprovides feedback on test results to each student based upon his or her increases or decreases with theprevious test score (hereafter, Idio-comparative marking). The authors compared the Idio-comparativescoring system with a regular ‘individual result together with class average’ method in an eight-weeklong quasi-experimental study conducted with 52 first-year Japanese university students. The authorsaimed to gain an understanding of whether there were any salient statistical advantages in giving classaverages to students to compare with their own result, thus nullifying the Idio-comparative idea. Thestudy used a Pretest-Posttest design, with the results of an analysis of variance suggesting there to be nostatistically significant difference (p = .77) between the Idio-comparative Group and Give-average Group.The authors suggest the Idio-comparative approach as one to be considered by language teachers in order to assist with building and preserving the confidence of the students participating in the class.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LEİS, A., WİLSON, M. (2017). Giving Class Averages: Is It Worth It?. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 37–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/284883

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Boggiano, A. K., & Pittman, T. S. (1992). Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Covington, M. (1998).
  4. The will to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Covington, M. (2004). Self-worth theory: Goes to college or do our motivation theories motivate? In D. M. McInerney, S. V. Etten (Eds.) Big theories revisited. (pp. 91-114).
  6. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Crandall, V. C., Katkozsky, W., & Crandall, V. J. (1965). Childrens’ beliefs in their own control of reinforcement in intellectual-academic situations. Child Development, 36, 91-109. http://doi.org/b6ff76
  7. Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), 674-685. http://doi.org/c2zrzk
  8. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books. Dweck, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 109-116. http://doi.org/dtz6bq
  9. Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post-hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn, Germany: Bonn University, Department of Psychology. Hirai, A. (2014). A Review of Four Studies on Measuring Vocabulary Knowledge. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 3 (2), 85_92. doi: 10.7820/vli.v03.2.hirai Hoppe, F. (1930). Untersuchungen zur Handlungs – und Affektpsychologie IV [Psychological studies of action and affect IV: Success and failure]. Erfolg und Misserfolg Psychologische Forschung, 14, 1-63. http://doi.org/fsxt3p
  10. Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-126. http://doi.org/dbv3tc
  11. Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835-847. http://doi.org/cvfs7j
  12. Keefe, J. W. (2007). What is personalization? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 217-223. http://doi.org/b4v2
  13. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London, UK: Longman. Leis, A. (November, 2013). The effects of classroom English on proficiency and self-confidence: A self-worth perspective. Presented at The Tohoku English