Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Exploring the Mental Lexicon of the Multilingual: Vocabulary Size, Cognate Recognition and Lexical Access in the L1, L2 and L3

Sayfa
1–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings, complemented by a self-rating language background questionnaire, indicate a strong link between Romanian and English lexical proficiency.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Recent empirical findings in the field of Multilingualism have shown that the mental lexicon of a language learner does not consist of separate entities, but rather of an intertwined system where languages can interact with each other (e.g.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Cenoz, 2013; Szubko-Sitarek, 2015).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings, complemented by a self-rating language background questionnaire, indicate a strong link between Romanian and English lexical proficiency.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:L2 and L3 · Vocabulary size · cognates

Abstract

Recent empirical findings in the field of Multilingualism have shown that the mental lexicon of a language learner does not consist of separate entities, but rather of an intertwined system where languages can interact with each other (e.g. Cenoz, 2013; Szubko-Sitarek, 2015). Accordingly, multilingual language learners have been considered differently to second language learners in a growing number of studies, however studies on the variation in learners’ vocabulary size both in the L2 and L3 and the effect of cognates on the target languages have been relatively scarce. This paper, therefore, investigates the impact of prior lexical knowledge on additional language learning in the case of Hungarian native speakers, who use Romanian (a Romance language) as a second language (L2) and learn English as an L3. The study employs an adapted version of the widely used Vocabulary Size Test (Nation & Beglar, 2007), the Romanian Vocabulary Size Test (based on the Romanian Frequency List; Szabo, 2015) and a Hungarian test (based on a Hungarian frequency list; Varadi, 2002) in order to measure vocabulary sizes, cognate knowledge and response times in these languages. The findings, complemented by a self-rating language background questionnaire, indicate a strong link between Romanian and English lexical proficiency.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SZABO, C. Z. (2016). Exploring the Mental Lexicon of the Multilingual: Vocabulary Size, Cognate Recognition and Lexical Access in the L1, L2 and L3. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 1–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/284848

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Ard, J. and Homburg, T. (1983). Verification of language transfer. In S. M. Gass, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning: Issues in second language research (pp. 157- 176). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Cognitive development of bilingual children. Language Teaching, 44(1), 36–54. http://doi.org/fwdmxt
  3. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2008). Lexical access in bilinguals: Effects of vocabulary size and executive control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6), 522–538. http://doi.org/d8m5mh
  4. Cenoz, J. (2000). Research on multilingual acquisition. In J. Cenoz, & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (pp. 39-53).
  5. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of linguistic difference, L2 status and age on crosslinguistic influence in third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (9-20).
  6. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46, 71-86.
  7. Cenoz, J., & Genessee, F. (1998). Psycholinguistic perspectives on multilingualism and multilingual education. In J. Cenoz, & F. Genesee (Eds.), Beyond bilingualism. Multilingualism and multilingual education (pp. 16-32).
  8. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Chen, X., Ramírez, G., Luo, Y. C., Geva, E., & Ku, Y. M. (2012). Comparing vocabulary development in Spanish- and Chinese-speaking ELLs: The effects of metalinguistic and sociocultural factors. Reading and Writing 25, 1991-2020.
  9. Cobb, T. (2000). One size fits all? Francophone learners and English vocabulary tests. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 295-324. de Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. De Angelis, G., & Selinker, L. (2001). Interlanguage transfer and competing linguistic systems in the multilingual mind. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 42-58).
  10. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. García, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanishspeaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 371-92. http://doi.org/fpmhpb Gas