Dergiler / Marmara Medical Journal / 2001 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

BRUCELLA DISCITIS

Sayfa
182–185
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The spine and intervertebral discs are most frequently affected.In this case, we report the MRI findings of a brucellar spondylodiscitis located at L5-S1 level and overview of applications of MRI in brucella spondylodiscitis and its differential diagnosis.Key Words: Brucellosis, Spine, Disc.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Brucellosis is endemic in certain parts of the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Musculoskeletal involvement is the most common complication of brucellosis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The spine and intervertebral discs are most frequently affected.In this case, we report the MRI findings of a brucellar spondylodiscitis located at L5-S1 level and overview of applications of MRI in brucella spondylodiscitis and its differential diagnosis.Key Words: Brucellosis, Spine, Disc.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Brucellosis is endemic in certain parts of the world. Musculoskeletal involvement is the most common complication of brucellosis. The spine and intervertebral discs are most frequently affected.In this case, we report the MRI findings of a brucellar spondylodiscitis located at L5-S1 level and overview of applications of MRI in brucella spondylodiscitis and its differential diagnosis.Key Words: Brucellosis, Spine, Disc.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEPE, M. S. (2001). BRUCELLA DISCITIS. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 182–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/284229

Kaynakça (8)

  1. I. Berkow R, Fletcher AJ. Bacterial diseases. The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, chi, 16 th edition, dew Jersey: Merck Sc Co. Inc., 1992:109. Al-Shahed MS, Sharif LS, Haddad MC, et al. Imaging features of musculoskeletal brucellosis. Radiographies 1994; 14:333-348.
  2. Haughton VM, Daniels DL, Czervionke LF, et al. Cervical spine. In; Stark DD, Bradley WG, eds. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, third edition, volume 3. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby, 1999:1849-1850.
  3. Castillo M, Smith JR, Mukherji SR. The spine In: Lee JRT, SageI SS, Stanley RJ, Heiken JP, eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI correlation, third edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven, 1998; 1467-1470.
  4. Friedman D, Hills J. Cervical epidural spinal infection: MR imaging characteristics. AJR 1994;163:699-704.
  5. Chew FS, Rline MJ. Diagnostic yield of CT- guided percutaneous aspiration procedures in suspected spontaneous infectious diskitis: Radiology 2001;218:211-214.
  6. Brant-Zawadzki Md, Dennis SC, Gade G F, Weinstein MP. Low back pain. Radiology 2000;217:321-330.
  7. Pina MA, Ara JR, Modrego PJ, Juyol MC, Capablo JL. Brucellar spinal epidural abscess. Eur J deurology 1999;6:87-89.
  8. Slone RS, Gierada DS. Pleura, chest wall, and diaphragm. In: Lee JRT, SageI SS, Stanley RJ, Heiken JP, eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI correlation, third edition, vol one. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Raven, 1998:509- 510. Maiuri F, laconnetta G, Gallicchio B, Manto A, Brigand F. Spondylodiskitis: Clinical and magnetic resonance diagnosis. Spine 1997;22:1741-1746. Osborn AG. donneoplasdc disorders of the spine and spinal cord. Diagnostic deuroradiology. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby, 1994: 824.