Dergiler / Marmara Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

The value of non-invasive tests for risk stratification in patients with compensated cirrhosis

Sayfa
55–58
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, these tests,especially hepatic vein catheterism, are relatively invasiveand impractical for the frequent follow-up of these patients.This has fostered the interest in the use of non-invasive toolsfor the assessment of patients with compensated cirrhosis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Liver cirrhosis is characterized by a long compensatedphase, with a median survival from diagnosis of around12 years.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:When decompensation occurs (variceal bleeding,jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites) the expectedmedian survival is around two years [1,2].
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, these tests,especially hepatic vein catheterism, are relatively invasiveand impractical for the frequent follow-up of these patients.This has fostered the interest in the use of non-invasive toolsfor the assessment of patients with compensated cirrhosis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Liver cirrhosis is characterized by a long compensatedphase, with a median survival from diagnosis of around12 years. When decompensation occurs (variceal bleeding,jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites) the expectedmedian survival is around two years [1,2]. Whereas there area number of well-validated scores for prognosis predictionand risk stratification in patients with decompensatedcirrhosis, these are very limited in the case of compensatedcirrhosis [1]. The two most widely validated prognosticfactors in compensated cirrhosis are the presence of clinicallysignificant portal hypertension (CSPH) [3], defined asa hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg, and thepresence of esophageal varices [1]. The gold standard teststo assess CSPH and varices are hepatic vein catheterismand endoscopy, respectively [4]. However, these tests,especially hepatic vein catheterism, are relatively invasiveand impractical for the frequent follow-up of these patients.This has fostered the interest in the use of non-invasive toolsfor the assessment of patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Abstract

Liver cirrhosis is characterized by a long compensatedphase, with a median survival from diagnosis of around12 years. When decompensation occurs (variceal bleeding,jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites) the expectedmedian survival is around two years [1,2]. Whereas there area number of well-validated scores for prognosis predictionand risk stratification in patients with decompensatedcirrhosis, these are very limited in the case of compensatedcirrhosis [1]. The two most widely validated prognosticfactors in compensated cirrhosis are the presence of clinicallysignificant portal hypertension (CSPH) [3], defined asa hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg, and thepresence of esophageal varices [1]. The gold standard teststo assess CSPH and varices are hepatic vein catheterismand endoscopy, respectively [4]. However, these tests,especially hepatic vein catheterism, are relatively invasiveand impractical for the frequent follow-up of these patients.This has fostered the interest in the use of non-invasive toolsfor the assessment of patients with compensated cirrhosis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ABRALDES, J. G. (2016). The value of non-invasive tests for risk stratification in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 55–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/283856

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol 2006;44:217-31. D’Amico G, Pasta L, Morabito A, et al. Competing risks and prognostic stages of cirrhosis: a 25-year inception cohort study of 494 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014;39:1180- Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2007;133:481- Abraldes JG, Araujo IK, Turon F, Berzigotti A. Diagnosing and monitoring cirrhosis: Liver biopsy, hepatic venous pressure gradient and elastography. Gastroenterol Hepatol 35:488-95.
  2. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2254-61.
  3. Ripoll C, Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts development of hepatocellular carcinoma independently of severity of cirrhosis. J Hepatol 50:923-8.
  4. Garcia-Tsao G, Groszmann RJ, Fisher RL, Conn HO Atterbury CE, Glickman M. Portal pressure, presence of gastroesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. Hepatology 5:419-24.
  5. Berzigotti A, Seijo S, Reverter E, Bosch J. Assessing portal hypertension in liver diseases. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;7:141-55.
  6. Rosselli M, MacNaughtan J, Jalan R, Pinzani M. Beyond scoring: a modern interpretation of disease progression in chronic liver disease. Gut 2013;62:1234-41.
  7. Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2005;128:343-50.
  8. Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology 2010;51:828-35.
  9. European Association for Study of L, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del H. EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: Non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis. J Hepatol 2015;63:237-64.
  10. Myers RP, Pomier-Layrargues G, Kirsch R, et al. Discordance in fibrosis staging between liver biopsy and transient elastography using the FibroScan XL probe. J Hepatol 2012;56:564-70.
  11. Myers RP, Pomier-Layrargues G, Kirsch R, et al. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of the FibroScan XL probe for liver stiffness measurement in overweight and obese patients. Hepatology 20