Dergiler / Marmara Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Fat graft survival inside pocket for silicone implant

Sayfa
42–47
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although, the fat viability rate was higher in control groups, there was no statistically significant difference compared tothe capsule or silicone groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our study results suggest that implant capsule is a hospitable environment and resection of the capsule is unnecessary, ifsilicone implants are expected to be removed following fat injection.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the survival potential of the fat grafts inside the implant capsule in an experimentalsetting.Materials and Methods: Twenty male Wistar albino rats were used.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:On day 60, fat grafts injected into the silicone capsuleeither by removing the silicone sheaths or leaving the silicone sheaths in their place.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although, the fat viability rate was higher in control groups, there was no statistically significant difference compared tothe capsule or silicone groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our study results suggest that implant capsule is a hospitable environment and resection of the capsule is unnecessary, ifsilicone implants are expected to be removed following fat injection.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Fat graft · Lipofilling · Adipocyte

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the survival potential of the fat grafts inside the implant capsule in an experimentalsetting.Materials and Methods: Twenty male Wistar albino rats were used. A two-staged surgical procedure was performed. In the first stage,silicone sheets were placed in the subcutaneous plane on the left side of each rat. On day 60, fat grafts injected into the silicone capsuleeither by removing the silicone sheaths or leaving the silicone sheaths in their place. In both groups, the same amount of the fat graftswas injected into the right side of the dorsal subcutaneous plane of the rats and they served as their own controls. The findings wereevaluated according to the histopathological criteria.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the inflammatory cell infiltration, fibrosis, and necrotic adipocytes amongthe groups. Although, the fat viability rate was higher in control groups, there was no statistically significant difference compared tothe capsule or silicone groups (p>0.05).Conclusion: Our study results suggest that implant capsule is a hospitable environment and resection of the capsule is unnecessary, ifsilicone implants are expected to be removed following fat injection.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOCAASLAN, F. N. D., ÇAVUŞ, M. Ö., BAYRAMİÇLİ, M., TUNCER, F. B. (2020). Fat graft survival inside pocket for silicone implant. Marmara Medical Journal, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 42–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/283785

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Silva EN, Ribas-Filho JM, Czeczko NG, et al. Histological evaluation of capsules formed by silicone implants coated with polyurethane foam and with a textured surface in rats. Acta Cir Bras 2016
  2. doi: 10.1590/ S0102.865.0201601.200.00001 [2] Imber G, Schwager RG, Guthrie RH Jr, Gray GF. Fibrous capsule formation after subcutaneous implanation of synthetic materials in experimental animals. Plast Reconstr Surg 1974
  3. Wagner H, Beller FK, Pfautsch M. Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977
  4. Sarifakioglu N, Gökrem S, Bingul F, Ustun H, Aslan G. The fate of transplanted fibrous capsule as an autogenous graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005
  5. Simonacci F, Grieco MP, Bertozzi N, Raposio E. Autologous fat transplantation for secondary breast reconstruction: our experience. G Chir. 2017 May-Jun
  6. 38(3):117-123. [6] Streit LM D, Lhotsky R, Mestak O. Autologous fat transfer, breast lipomodelling and fat transfer to the face: Current gold standards and emerging new data. Acta Chir Plast 2017
  7. Chiu CH. Does Stromal Autologous fat transfer, breast lipomodelling and fat transfer to the face: Current gold standards and emerging new data. Aesthet Surg J 2018 Feb 9. [Epub ahead of print] [8] Boccara D, Haddad J, Chaouat M, Serror K, Mimoun M. Treating breast conservation therapy defects with brava and fat grafting: technique, outcomes, and safety profile. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018
  8. 965e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.000.000.0000004299. [9] Delay E, Meruta AC, Guerid S. Indications and controversies in total breast reconstruction with lipomodeling. Clin Plast Surg2018
  9. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.08.009. [10] Delay E, Guerid S, Meruta AC. Indications and controversies in lipofilling for partial rreast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg2018
  10. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2017.08.008. [11] Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R. Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 2009
  11. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2009.08.010. [12] Spear SL, Wilson HB, Lockwood MD. Fat injection to correct contour deformities in the reconstructed breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005
  12. 1300e5. [13] Hammond DC, O’Connor EA, Scheer JR. Total envelope fat grafting: a novel approach in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015
  13. doi: 10.1097/PRS.000.000.0000000968. [14] FishRE. Anesthesia and Analgesia