Dergiler / Mathematical and Computational Applications / 2007 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

A correspondence between IBA-I and IBA-II model and electromagnetic transitions of some erbium isotopes

Sayfa
69–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the IBA-2, the lowest states are indeed fully symmetric, the calculations with the help of this projection, we explore the energy levels and the electric quadrupole transition probabilities $B(E2;I_i - I_f)$ and $\gamma$-ray E2/M1 mixing ratios for selected transitions of $^{166-168}Er$ .Owing to admixtures of non-fully-symmetric states in IBA-2, we renormalized the parameters $(\epsilon)$ and (K).This is the first time we show that this projection can be applied to some heavier isotopes and the results obtained for $^{166-168}Er$ isotopes are reasonably in good agreement with the previous experimental values.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Since the lowest levels are symmetric under the interchange of neutrons and protons from calculations in the interacting boson approximation IBA-2 model, IBA-1 model space, in which neutron and proton degrees of freedom are not distinguished can be considered as a subspace of the IBA-2 model space.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using the microscopic background of the IBA-2 model, a correspondence can be established between IBA-1and IBA-2 model space.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the IBA-2, the lowest states are indeed fully symmetric, the calculations with the help of this projection, we explore the energy levels and the electric quadrupole transition probabilities $B(E2;I_i - I_f)$ and $\gamma$-ray E2/M1 mixing ratios for selected transitions of $^{166-168}Er$ .Owing to admixtures of non-fully-symmetric states in IBA-2, we renormalized the parameters $(\epsilon)$ and (K).This is the first time we show that this projection can be applied to some heavier isotopes and the results obtained for $^{166-168}Er$ isotopes are reasonably in good agreement with the previous experimental values.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Since the lowest levels are symmetric under the interchange of neutrons and protons from calculations in the interacting boson approximation IBA-2 model, IBA-1 model space, in which neutron and proton degrees of freedom are not distinguished can be considered as a subspace of the IBA-2 model space. Using the microscopic background of the IBA-2 model, a correspondence can be established between IBA-1and IBA-2 model space. Since the space of the IBA-1 model can be regarded as a subspace of the IBA-2 model there is a unique way to “Project” the operators of the IBA-2 model onto those of IBA-1. This projection can be carried out by using the Fspin formalism. In the IBA-2, the lowest states are indeed fully symmetric, the calculations with the help of this projection, we explore the energy levels and the electric quadrupole transition probabilities $B(E2;I_i - I_f)$ and $\gamma$-ray E2/M1 mixing ratios for selected transitions of $^{166-168}Er$ .Owing to admixtures of non-fully-symmetric states in IBA-2, we renormalized the parameters $(\epsilon)$ and (K).This is the first time we show that this projection can be applied to some heavier isotopes and the results obtained for $^{166-168}Er$ isotopes are reasonably in good agreement with the previous experimental values.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAZAR, H. R., ULUER, İ. (2007). A correspondence between IBA-I and IBA-II model and electromagnetic transitions of some erbium isotopes. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 69–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/279993

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. R. L. Gill, R. F. Casten, W. R. Phillips, B. J. Varley, C. J. Lister, J. L. Durell, J. A. Shannon, and D. D. Warner, Phys. Rev. C. 54, 2276-2286, 1996
  2. I. Alfter, E. Bodenstedt, W. Knichel and J. Schüth, Nucl.Phys.A635, 273-291, 1998
  3. L.M.Chen,Chinese Journal of Phy. 36,13-19, 1998
  4. B. R. Barrett, S. Kuyucak, P. Navrátil, and P. Van Isacker, Phys.Rev.C. 60, 037302-037306, 1999
  5. R.S.Gou ve L.M.Chen, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 26, 1775–1786, 2000
  6. O.S. Van Roosmalen,A.E.L. Dieperink, and F.Iachello, Chem. Phys. Lett. 85, 32-36,1982
  7. M.E. Kellman and P.R. Herrick,Phys.Rev.A22,1536-1551, 1980
  8. A. Bohr and P.R. Motelson, Phys. Scripta 22, 468, 1980
  9. A. Arima,T. Otsuka, F. Iachello and I. Talmi, Phys.Lett. 66B, 205-208, 1977
  10. Olaf Scholten: PhD Thesis University of Groningen, 1980 11. O. Scholten: Internal Report KVI 252 computer code PHINT University of Groningen 1980
  11. Voight and M.J.A. Dudek, Rev. Mod. Phys., 55, 949-1046, 1983
  12. A.Arima and F.Iachello, Ann. Phys. NY 99, 253-317, 1976
  13. A. Arima and F. Iachello: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 31, 75-105, 1981
  14. D.D. Warner,R.F.Casten,W.F.Davidson: Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 1819-1822, 1981
  15. O. Scholten, F. Iachello and A. Arima, Annals of.Phys., 115, 325-366, 1978
  16. P.O.Lipas, P.Toivonen and E.Hammeren, Nucl.Phys. A469,348-368, 1987
  17. A. Wolf, O. Scholten, R.F. Casten: Phys. Rev., C43, 2279-2283, 1991
  18. A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, 1975, Nuclear Structure (Benjamin, New York), Vol.II
  19. D. P. Grechukhin, Nucl. Phys. 40, 422-437, 1963
  20. J.Lange, K.Kumar, J. H. Hamilton, Rev.Mod.Phys. 54,119-194, 1982
  21. K.S.Krane and J.D.Moses, Phys. Rev. C24, 654-664, 1981
  22. K.R. Baker, J.H. Hamilton, J.Lange and A.V. Ramayya, Phys. Lett. B57, 441-444,1975
  23. J.M.Domingos, G.D.Symons, Nucl.Phys. A180, 600-614, 1972
  24. K. Schreckenbach and W. Gellety, Phys. Lett. B94, 298-302, 1980
  25. W. Gellety, P.Van Isacker and D.D. Warner, Phys. Lett. B191, 240-244, 1987.