Dergiler / Mathematical and Computational Applications / 2011 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Stress analysis in Al based composites depending on joining quality

Sayfa
194–202
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

Türkçe Öz Yok

Abstract

It is essential that joints in the design of aluminium based materials be safe and at the desired strength. Specific methods are to be used in welding of these materials. Brazing, that assures joining without changing the material properties, is widely used for this purpose. In this method, quality joining can be achieved, provided the parameters are set up accurately. In this study, joining characteristics of aluminium based composite materials widely used in automotive industry are investigated in detail. Solid models of the parts manufactured by brazing are created using Solidworks software. Hydrostatic loading similar to the real working conditions is applied to these models and stress analysis is performed using ANSYS software. In the samples, joining regions are 2 mm and 2,83 mm in length; and stress distributions are investigated in three groups assuming full, 70% and 50% joining. Stresses arising from loading in the model are below the damage inducing level, but the shape and the length of the joining region are observed to be significant in stress development.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖKSAL, N. S., ALKAN, M. (2011). Stress analysis in Al based composites depending on joining quality. Mathematical and Computational Applications, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 194–202. https://ajindex.com/articles/279875

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. M.A. Hazizan and W.J. Cantwell, The low velocity impact response of an aluminium honeycomb sandwich structure. Composites: Part, B, 34(8), 679-687, 2003. 2.J.K., Paik, K. Anil, A.K. Thayamballi, and Kim, G.S. The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels, Thin-Walled Structures, 35(3), 205-231, 1999. 3.M.O. Kaman, M.Y. Solmaz, K. Turan, Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Critical Buckling Load of Honeycomb Sandwich Panels, Journal of Composite 44 (21), 2010. 4.Y.M. Jen, C.W. Ko and H.B. Lin, Effect of the amount of adhesive on the bending fatigue strength of adhesively bonded aluminium honeycomb sandwich beams, International Journal of Fatigue, 31(3), 455^462, 2009. 5.M. He and W., Hu, A study on composite honeycomb sandwich panel structure, M. Materials and Design, 29(3), 709-713. 2008. 6.C. Ataş, A cost effective method for impact induced damage assessment of laminated plates, Science and Engineering of Composite Materials, 15, 31- 49. 2008. 7.G.G. Galletti, C. Vinquistand and O.S. Es-Said, Theoretical design and analysis of a honeycomb panel sandwich structure loaded in pure bending, Engineering Failure Analysis, 15(5), 555-562. 2008 8.A.R. Othman and D.C. Barton, Failure initiation and propagation characteristics of honeycomb sandwich composites, Composite Structures, 85(2), 126-138, 2008. 9.I.M. Daniel and J.L. Abot,, Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams, Composites Science and Technology, 60(12-13), 2455-2463, 2000. 10.P. Bunyawanichakul, B. Castanie and J.J. Barraîı, Non-linear finite element analysis of inserts in composite sandwich structures, Composites: Part B, 39(7-8), 1077-1092,2008. 11.L. Aktay, A.F. Johnson and B.H. Kroplin, Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 75(9), 2616-2630, 2008. 12.S. Belouettar, A. Abbadi, Z.Azari, R.Belouettar and P. Freres, Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four point bending tests, Composite Structures, 87(3), 265-273, 2009. 13.T. Fiedler and A. Ochsner, Experimental analysis of the flexural properties of sandwich panels with cellular core materials, Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 39(2), 121-124, 2008. 15.Y.P. Siow and V.P.W. Shim, An experimental study of low velocity impact damage in woven fiber composites, Journal of Composite Materials, 32, 1178-1202, 1998. 16.M. He and W. Hu, A study on composite honeycomb sandwich panel structure, M