Dergiler / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6

Semiology and a Semiological Reading of Power Myths in Education

Sayfa
2167–2191
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded based on the signs included in the image that values recognized as the building blocks of a capitalist economy such as "technology," "industrialization," "progress," "growth," and "enrichment" were transferred through a mythical presentation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:By referring to the theory of semiology, this study aims to present how certain phrases, applications, images, and objects, which are assumed to be unnoticed in the educational process as if they were natural, could be read as signs encrypted with certain ideologically-loaded cultural codes, and to propose semiology as a method for educational studies by means of a sample analysis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this reference frame, the cover photograph of the Social Sciences Textbook adopted for use by the 5th grade in primary schools under the Ministry of National Education (MNE) during the 20112012 school year was analyzed as a sample, taking into consideration the principles of semiological analysis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded based on the signs included in the image that values recognized as the building blocks of a capitalist economy such as "technology," "industrialization," "progress," "growth," and "enrichment" were transferred through a mythical presentation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

By referring to the theory of semiology, this study aims to present how certain phrases, applications, images, and objects, which are assumed to be unnoticed in the educational process as if they were natural, could be read as signs encrypted with certain ideologically-loaded cultural codes, and to propose semiology as a method for educational studies by means of a sample analysis. Semiological reading means to interpret the objects that surround our visible environment not just with their primary meaning but also based on their cultural codes, their metaphorical meanings. The signs that surround our environment present us with an order of myths that hide political meaning and naturalize this meaning. In this regard, reading signs and making a political analysis or analyzing the ideological codes of myths adds up to the same thing. In this study mythicized discourses within the educational process were analyzed based on the semiological reading approach. In this reference frame, the cover photograph of the Social Sciences Textbook adopted for use by the 5th grade in primary schools under the Ministry of National Education (MNE) during the 20112012 school year was analyzed as a sample, taking into consideration the principles of semiological analysis. It was concluded based on the signs included in the image that values recognized as the building blocks of a capitalist economy such as "technology," "industrialization," "progress," "growth," and "enrichment" were transferred through a mythical presentation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÜKÜRT, R. O. (2016). Semiology and a Semiological Reading of Power Myths in Education. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 6, 2167–2191. https://ajindex.com/articles/274496

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Adanır, O. (2009). Gösterge ekonomi politiği hakkında bir eleştiri üstüne [On for a critique of the political economy of the sign]. In J. Baudrillard (Ed.), Gösterge ekonomi politiği hakkında bir eleştiri [For a critique of the political economy of the sign] (pp. ix-xii). İstanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  2. Akerson, E. F. (2005). Göstergebilime giriş [Introduction to semiology]. İstanbul:
  3. Multilingual Yayınları.
  4. Aksoy, H. H. (2005). Küresel kapitalizmin kamusal eğitime etkileri [Effects of global capitalism on public education]. Abece Dergisi, 232, 2-7.
  5. Althusser, L. (1991). İdeoloji ve devletin ideolojik aygıtları [Ideology and ideological state apparatuses] (Y. Alp & M. Özışık, Trans.) İstanbul, Turkey: İletişim Yayınları.
  6. Apple, M. (2006). Eğitim ve iktidar [Education and power] (E. Bulut, Trans.) İstanbul, Turkey: Kalkedon. Atabek, G. Ş. (2007). Göstergebilimsel çözümleme; iletişim çalışmalarında göstergebilimsel yöntem [Semiological analysis; semiological method in communication studies]. In Ş. Gülseren & Ü. Atabek (Eds.), Medya metinlerini çözümlemek [Analyzing media texts] (pp. 65-85).
  7. Ankara, Turkey: Siyasal Kitabevi.
  8. Ayers, W. R. (2012). Eğitim bir giriş [Education an introduction]. MonthlyReview, 29, 41-45.
  9. Barthes, R. (1990). Çağdaş söylenler [Mythologies] (T. Yücel, Trans.) İstanbul, Turkey: Hürriyet Yayınları.
  10. Barthes, R. (1999). S/Z. In T. Yücel (Ed.), Yazı ve yorum [Writing and interpretation] (T. Yücel, Trans.) (pp. 125-138).
  11. İstanbul, Turkey: Metis Yayınları.
  12. Barthes, R. (2005). Göstergebilimsel serüven [Semiological adventure] (M. Rifat & S. Rifat, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: YKY. Başol, S., Ünal, F., Azer, H., Yıldız, A., & Evirgen, Ö. F. (2011). İlköğretim 5.sınıf sosyalbilgiler ders ve öğrenci çalışma kitabı [Secondary School 5th grade social sciences textbook and student book]. Ankara, Turkey: MEB Devlet Kitapları, Semih Ofset. Baudrillard, J. (2009). Gösterge ekonomipolitiği hakkında bir eleştiri [For a critique of the political economy of the sign] (O. Adanır, Trans.) İstanbul, Turkey: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  13. Bernstein, B. (1990). Social class and pedagogic practice. In B. Bernstein (Ed.), The structuring of pedagogic discourse: Class, code and control (pp. 63-93).
  14. London, UK: Routledge. Boratav, K. (2002). İktisat tarihi (1908-1980) [History of economics]. In S. Akşin (Ed.), Türkiye tarihi: Çağdaş Türkiye 1908-1980 [History of Turkey: Contemporary Turkey 1908-1980] (Vol. 4., pp. 297-380).
  15. İstanbul, Turkey: Ce