KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies / 2016 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

What Is Your Favorite Local Food Menu? Application of Conjoint Analysis on the Eastern Mediterranean Cuisine of Turkey

Ozan GULER
SERCAN BENLİ
GÜRKAN AKDAĞ
A. Halil ÇAKICI
Sayfa
38–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This tradeoff behavior by the consumers illustrates that the more variety presented in the local menu, the higher the prices that could be charged.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim of this study is twofold; (l) investigating consumers’ preference for favorite local food menu composed of regionally known soups, appetizers, main courses and desserts, and (2) understanding the criteria on which the consumers show their trade-off attitudes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data was collected during the 01-31 May 2015 through survey composed of 18 menu cards and 154 usable questionnaires were gathered as consequence.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This tradeoff behavior by the consumers illustrates that the more variety presented in the local menu, the higher the prices that could be charged.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim of this study is twofold; (l) investigating consumers’ preference for favorite local food menu composed of regionally known soups, appetizers, main courses and desserts, and (2) understanding the criteria on which the consumers show their trade-off attitudes. Data was collected during the 01-31 May 2015 through survey composed of 18 menu cards and 154 usable questionnaires were gathered as consequence. Full profile conjoint analyses were applied as statistical technique in order to analyzing data. Major findings from the empirical study point to the fact that participants confer the highest importance to the main dishes while the least importance is placed on the price. The most favored menu cards reveal that those with ‘Adana kebab’ are of priority to the consumers. The most favorite menu card is composed of mixture of Adana and Gaziantep cuisines. This tradeoff behavior by the consumers illustrates that the more variety presented in the local menu, the higher the prices that could be charged.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GULER, O., BENLİ, S., AKDAĞ, G., ÇAKICI, A. H. (2016). What Is Your Favorite Local Food Menu? Application of Conjoint Analysis on the Eastern Mediterranean Cuisine of Turkey. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 38–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/271317

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Antun, J. M. and Gustafson, C. M. (2005). Menu analysis: Design, merchandising, and pricing strategies used by successful restaurants and private clubs. Journal of nutrition in recipe & menu development, 3(3-4), pp. 81- 102. Bernstein, D., Ottenfeld, M., and Witte, C. L. (2008). A study of consumer attitudes regarding variability of menu offerings in the context of an upscale seafood restaurant. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 11:4, pp. 398-411.
  2. Bianchi, C. and Mortimer, G. (2015). Drivers of local food consumption: a comparative study. British Food Journal, 117(9), pp. 2282-2299.
  3. Bloom, D. (2010). Supermarket retailers meet the local food movement: Conceptualizing the theoretical and empirical implications of walmart’s local produce initiative. Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Atlanta, Georgia. August 23-25.
  4. Born, B. and Purcell, M. (2006). Avoiding the local trap scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(2), pp. 195-207.
  5. Choi, J. and Zhao, J. (2014). Consumers' behaviors when eating out. British Food Journal, 116(3), pp. 494-509.
  6. Darby, K., Batte, M. T., Ernst, S. and Roe, B. (2008). Decomposing local: a conjoint analysis of locally produced foods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(2), pp.476-486.
  7. Delemen, İ. (2001). Antik dönemde beslenme. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınları, pp.1-70.
  8. Ding, S., Geschke, U. and Lewis, R. (1991). Conjoint analysis and its application in the hospitality industry. Journal of the International Academy of Hospitality Research Logo, (2), pp. 1-30.
  9. Ertaş, Y., and Gezmen-Karadağ, M. (2013). Sağlıklı Beslenmede Türk Mutfak Kültürünün Yeri. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1). Frash Jr, R. E., DiPietro, R. and Smith, W. (2015). Pay more for McLocal? Examining motivators for willingness to pay for local food in a chain restaurant setting. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 24(4), pp. 411-434. Gaziantep Cuisine, (2016). http://www.gaziantepmutfagi.org/Tourism,gaziantepen,106.html [accessed 29 March 2016]
  10. Giddens, A. (2000), Sosyoloji. (Translation by H. Özer, C. Güzel). Ankara:
  11. Ayraç. Guerrero, L., Claret, A., Verbeke, W., Enderli, G., Zakowska-Biemans, S., Vanhonacker, F. and Contel, M. (2010). Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association. Food Quality and Preference, 21(2), pp. 225-233.
  12. Güneş, G., Ülker, H. İ. an