Dergiler / Journal of the Entomological Research Society / 2012 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Skin and oviposition deterrent, ovicidal and deleterious delayed mortality effects of α-amyrin acetate against the malarial vector Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae)

Sayfa
39–53
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is clear that α-amyrin acetate of C. roseus can affect the oviposition cycle of A. stephensi Liston, thereby suppressing the vector population and adversely influencing transmission of the disease pathogen.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Selective discriminating behaviour of the ovipositing female for an appropriate oviposition habitat selection and the substances involved in oviposition site choice by vector mosquitoes have recently become a focal point of interest in the concept of integrated vector control management.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the current study, we isolated and identified α-amyrin acetate from Catharanthus roseus Linn (Apocynaceae) and assessed the skin repellency, oviposition deterrency, ovicidal, gravid mortality and deleterious delayed mortality against the malarial vector Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera:Culicidae).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is clear that α-amyrin acetate of C. roseus can affect the oviposition cycle of A. stephensi Liston, thereby suppressing the vector population and adversely influencing transmission of the disease pathogen.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anopheles stephensi · Catharanthus roseus · hastalık vektörü

Abstract

Selective discriminating behaviour of the ovipositing female for an appropriate oviposition habitat selection and the substances involved in oviposition site choice by vector mosquitoes have recently become a focal point of interest in the concept of integrated vector control management. In the current study, we isolated and identified α-amyrin acetate from Catharanthus roseus Linn (Apocynaceae) and assessed the skin repellency, oviposition deterrency, ovicidal, gravid mortality and deleterious delayed mortality against the malarial vector Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera:Culicidae). Water treated with the α-amyrin acetate had a high deterrent activity in ovipositing females: oviposition activity index values for the test species were -0.22, -0.38, -0.42 and -0.52 for α-amyrin acetate at concentrations of 0.007, 0.015, 0.025 and 0.050 p.p.m., respectively. High degrees of mortality were observed with various concentrations of α-amyrin acetate: 1.12 (control) to 7.20 for gravid females, and 0.62 (control) to 9.05 for oviposited females. The highest mortality in both gravid and oviposited females was observed soon after they came in contact with oviposition medium treated with the α-amyrin acetate, and this was found to be significant at doses higher than 0.015 p.p.m., suggesting possible contact toxicity of the α-amyrin acetate. The α-amyrin acetate had the most effective skin repellency with ED50 and ED90 values of 0.6659 and 1.7720μg/cm2 with biting protection time of 3.5 h. The α-amyrin acetate caused moderate ovicidal activity against various age groups of A. stephensi but it inflicted delayed effects such as high larval, pupal and adult mortality. The age of the eggs and the duration of the α-amyrin acetate treatment influenced the ovicidal activity observed. It is clear that α-amyrin acetate of C. roseus can affect the oviposition cycle of A. stephensi Liston, thereby suppressing the vector population and adversely influencing transmission of the disease pathogen.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUPPUSAMY, C., MURUGAN, K. (2012). Skin and oviposition deterrent, ovicidal and deleterious delayed mortality effects of α-amyrin acetate against the malarial vector Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of the Entomological Research Society, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 39–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/270794

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Andreadis, T. G., 1977, An oviposition attractant of pupal origin in Culex salinarius. Mosquito News,37:53-56.
  2. Ansari, M. A., Razdan, R. K., 1995, Relative efficacy of various oils in repelling mosquitoes. Indian journal of malariology, 32: 104-111.
  3. Ansari, M. A., Vasudevan, P., Tandon, M., Razdan, R.K., 2000, Larvicidal and mosquito repellent action of peppermint (Mentha piperita) oil. Journal of Bio resource Technology. 71: 267-271.
  4. Beckett, A. H., Stenlake, J. B., 1986,
  5. Chromatography, In: Practical Pharmaceutical chemistry Vol.23rd edition Delhi India. 75-76.
  6. Pitasawat, P., Choochote, W., Tuetun, B., Tippawangkosol, P.,Kanjanapothi, D., Jitpakdi, A., Riyong, D., 2003, Repellency of aromatic turmeric Curcuma aromatic under laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Vector Ecology, 28: 234-240.
  7. Bentley, M. D., Day, J. F., 1989, Chemical ecology and behavioral aspects of mosquito oviposition. Annual Review Entomology, 34: 401-421.
  8. Broadbent, A. B., Pree, D. J., 1984. Effects of Diflubensuron and Bay SIR8514 on the oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) and the oblique-banded leaf roller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 77: 194-197.
  9. Brown, M., Hebert, A. A., 1997, Insect repellents: an overview. Journal of American Academy of Dermatology, 36: 243-249.
  10. Bruno, D. W., Laurence, B. R., 1979, The influence of the apical droplet of Culex egg rafts on oviposition of Culex pipiens fatigans (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 6: 300-305.
  11. Buescher, M. D., Rutledge, L. C., Wirtz, R. A., Glackin, K. B., Moussa, M. A., 1982, Laboratory tests of repellents against Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 19: 176-180.
  12. Choochote W, Chaithong U, Kamsuk K, Jitpakdi A, Tippawangkosol P, Tuetun B, Champakaew D, Pitasawat B (2007) Repellent activity of selected essential oils against Aedes aegypti. Fitoto, 78: 359-364.
  13. Coleman, R. E., Robert, L. W., Roberts, J. A., Glass, D. C, Seeley, A., Laughinghouse, P. V., Perkins, L. L., Wirtz, R. A., 1993, Laboratory evaluation of (Diptera: Culicidae) and two phebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 30: 499-502.
  14. Collins, D.A., Brady, J. N., 1993, Assessment of the efficacy of quwenling as a mosquito repellent. Phytotherapy Research 7: 17-20.
  15. Copeland, R. S., Walker, T. W., Robert, L. L., Githure, J. I., Wirtz, R. A., Klein, T. A., 1995, Response of wild Anopheles funestus to repellent-protected volunteers is unaf