Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

THE ALTERATION OF SAGITTAL LUMBOSACRAL ALIGNMENT AFTER POSTERIOR STABILIZATION-FUSION IN LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS: CLINICAL STUDY

Sayfa
24–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The objective of our study was to investigate how the surgery influenced sagittal spino-pelvic alignment of SL and to investigate the correlation between the effectiveness and the changes of spine-pelvic sagittal parameters for patients with SL before and after operation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Spondylolisthesis (SL) is a condition that occurs in 2-8% of the general population.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study is to understand how much we can correct sagittal lumbosacral alignment to maintain sagittal balance in SL by surgical treatment and to demonstrate the effectiveness of posterior fixation in maintaining sagittal balance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The objective of our study was to investigate how the surgery influenced sagittal spino-pelvic alignment of SL and to investigate the correlation between the effectiveness and the changes of spine-pelvic sagittal parameters for patients with SL before and after operation.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Spondylolisthesis (SL) is a condition that occurs in 2-8% of the general population. Sagittal spinopelvic alignment determines the mechanical stress in the lumbosacral junction. The aim of this study is to understand how much we can correct sagittal lumbosacral alignment to maintain sagittal balance in SL by surgical treatment and to demonstrate the effectiveness of posterior fixation in maintaining sagittal balance. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases operated with SL between January 2011 and June 2016. Wiltse classification was used to determine the type of SL. The parameters of sagittal balance (slip rate, slip angle, lumbar lordosis angle, lumbosacral kyphosis and sacral slope) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: The study was carried out with 63 cases, 31.7% (n=20) male and 68.3% (n=43) female. The mean age was 57.16±12.55 years. The correction of slip rate and slip angle was found to be statistically significant (p<0.01). Conclusion: The objective of our study was to investigate how the surgery influenced sagittal spino-pelvic alignment of SL and to investigate the correlation between the effectiveness and the changes of spine-pelvic sagittal parameters for patients with SL before and after operation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇEVİK, A., BAŞARAN, R., İŞ, M., SOMAY, H., BİBER, N., AKAR, E., BERKMAN, M. Z. (2020). THE ALTERATION OF SAGITTAL LUMBOSACRAL ALIGNMENT AFTER POSTERIOR STABILIZATION-FUSION IN LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS: CLINICAL STUDY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 24–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/270691

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, Guermazi A, Berkin V, Hunter DJ. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:199-205
  2. Simotas AC, Dorey FJ, Hansraj KK, Cammisa F Jr. Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:197-203
  3. White AA, Panjabi MM (Eds). Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Vol. 2. 1990: Lippincott, Philadelphia 1990;pp:2
  4. Huang RP, Bohlman HH, Thompson GH, Poe-Kochert C. Predictive value of pelvic incidence in progression of spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:2381-5
  5. Benzel EC. Biomechanics of spine stabilization. 3rd edition. Thieme.2015
  6. Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I. Classification of Spondyloisis and Spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;117:23-9
  7. Myerding H. Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1932;54:371-7
  8. Eismont FJ, Norton RP, Hirsch BP. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:203-13
  9. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, O’Brien M. The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5-s1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(6 Suppl):27-34
  10. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, O’Brien M. Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:1170-6
  11. He L, Wang YX, Gong JS, Griffith JF, Zeng XJ, Kwok AW, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of lumbar spondylolisthesis in elderly Chinese men and women. Eur Radiol. 2014;24: 441-8
  12. Gille O, Challier V, Parent H, Cavagna R, Poignard A, Faline A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Cohort of 670 patients, and proposal of a new classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;(6 Suppl)100:311-5
  13. Taillard W. Le Spondylolisthesis Chez L’enfant et L’adolescent1 (Etude de 50 cas). Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1954;24:115-44
  14. Yang M, Yang C, Ni H, Zhao Y, Li M. The Relationship between T1 Sagittal Angle and Sagittal Balance: A Retrospective Study of 119 Healthy Volunteers. PloS One. 2016;11:e0160957
  15. Wang Z, Wang B, Yin B, Liu W, Yang F, Lv G. The relationship between spinopelvic parameters and clinical symptoms of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis: a prospective study of 64 patients. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:560-8