Dergiler / Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Landmark-Based Morphological Differences Among the Exotic Rhinogobius lindbergi and Its Two Sympatric Gobies (Actinopterygii: Perciformes:Gobiidae) in Sefid River, in the Southern Caspian Sea Basin

Sayfa
159–169
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The exotic Rhinogobius can be distinguished from the sympatric gobies in Sefid River by short snout (vs. longer), deep body (vs. shallow), deeper head, stout body, and smaller ventral disc.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduced species may cause harm to native fish populations, which to design any conservative program to control the exotics an identification key is necessary.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To find the morphological differences among the exotic Rhinogobius lindbergi and its sympatric congeners including the endemic Ponticla iranicus and the native Ponticla gorlap, a 15-landmark morphometric system was used to examine 90 specimens in Sefid River, in the Southern Caspian Sea basin.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The exotic Rhinogobius can be distinguished from the sympatric gobies in Sefid River by short snout (vs. longer), deep body (vs. shallow), deeper head, stout body, and smaller ventral disc.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:90 specimens
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduced species may cause harm to native fish populations, which to design any conservative program to control the exotics an identification key is necessary. To find the morphological differences among the exotic Rhinogobius lindbergi and its sympatric congeners including the endemic Ponticla iranicus and the native Ponticla gorlap, a 15-landmark morphometric system was used to examine 90 specimens in Sefid River, in the Southern Caspian Sea basin. Univariate analysis of variance showed significant differences among the means of the three groups for 79 out of 105 standardized morphometric measurements. Principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical variates analysis (CVA) confirmed the statistically significant difference among these species. The CVA scatter plot showed that the 90 studied specimens grouped into three distinct areas with a degree of overlap between P. iranicus and P. gorlap. Clustering based on Euclidean distances among the groups of centroids using an UPGMA indicated segregation of the three species into two distinct clusters: P. iranicus and P. gorlap in one group and R. lindbergi in the other group. The exotic Rhinogobius can be distinguished from the sympatric gobies in Sefid River by short snout (vs. longer), deep body (vs. shallow), deeper head, stout body, and smaller ventral disc.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HEIDARI, A., SABET, H. M., SATTARI, M., ALAVI-YEGANEH, M. S. (2019). Landmark-Based Morphological Differences Among the Exotic Rhinogobius lindbergi and Its Two Sympatric Gobies (Actinopterygii: Perciformes:Gobiidae) in Sefid River, in the Southern Caspian Sea Basin. Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 159–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/270568

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Abdoli A, Coad BW, Naderi M. 2000.
  2. First record of Rhinogobius similis, Gill 1895 in Iran. Iran J Fish Sci. 9: 73–76.
  3. Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the revolution. Ital J Zool. 71(1):5-16. doi: 10.1080/11250000409356545 AnvariFar H, Khyabani A, Farahmand H, Vatandoust S, AnvariFar H, Jahageerdar S. 2011. Detection of morphometric differentiation between isolated up- and downstream populations of siah mahi (Capoeta capoeta gracilis) (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in the Tajan River (Iran). Hydrobiologia. 673(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0748-7 Bogutskaâ NG, [Bogutskaya, NG.], Kiâško, PV. [Kijashko, PV.], Naseka AM, Orlova MI. 2013. Opredelitelryb i bespozvonočnyh Kaspijskogo mora. T. 1. Ryby i mollûski [Identification keys for fish and invertebrates of the Caspian Sea. V. 1. Fishes and mollusks.] Sankt-Peterburg–Moskva: KMK Scientific Press 244 p. [In Russian with English summary.] Bookstein FL. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 512 p. Buj I, Podnar M, Mrakovcic M, Caleta M, Mustafic P, Zanella D. 2008. Morphological and genetic diversity of Sabanejewia balcanica in Croatia. Folia Zool. 57:100-110.
  4. Cadrin SX, Friedland KD. 1999. The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fish Res. 43(1-3):129-139 doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(99)00070-3 Cadrin SX. 2000. Advances in morphometric analysis of fish stock structure. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 10(1): 91-112. doi: 10.1023/A:1008939104413 Coad BW, Abdoli A. 2000. Rhinogobius cf. similis Gill, 1859, a goby new to the fish fauna of Iran and the problem of alien invasions. Zool Middle East. 20(1):55-59. doi: 10.1080/09397140.2000.10637812 Eagderi S, Jouladeh-Roudbar A, Soleymani A, Hosseinpour T. 2017. The first record of Rhinogobius similis Gill, 1859 from the Namak basin, Iran. Shil. 5(1):39-46.
  5. Eagderi S, Moradi M. 2017. Range extension of the lake goby Rhinogobius smilis Gill, 1859 (Teleostei: Gobidae) to the Urmia Lake basin in northwest Iran. Biharean Biologist. 11(2):123-125.
  6. Elliott NG, Haskard K, Koslow JA. 1995. Morphometric analysis of orange roughly (Hoplostethus atianticus) off the continental slope of Southern Australia. J Fish Biol. 46(2):202-220. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb05962.x Eschmeyer WN, Fong JD. 2011. Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa. 3148:26-38.
  7. Gozlan RE, Britton JR, Cow