Dergiler / JAREM / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The Association Between Great-Grand Multiparity and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Great-Grand Multiparite ile Tip 2 Diabetes Mellitus Gelişimi Arasındaki İlişki

Dergi
JAREM
Sayfa
7–9
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: A statistically significant relationship was found between great-grand multiparity and type 2 diabetes mellitus development.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: We planned to reveal the relationship between great-grand multiparity and type 2 diabetes mellitus development.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Between April 1, 2011 and April 1, 2012, the information of the patients who applied to the obstetrics and gynecology polyclinic in our hospital with various complaints was collected retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: A statistically significant relationship was found between great-grand multiparity and type 2 diabetes mellitus development.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: We planned to reveal the relationship between great-grand multiparity and type 2 diabetes mellitus development. Methods: Between April 1, 2011 and April 1, 2012, the information of the patients who applied to the obstetrics and gynecology polyclinic in our hospital with various complaints was collected retrospectively. The patients' age, height, weight, body mass index, number of births, and presence of diabetes mellitus were noted. Results: The study was conducted in the ethnic Arab-inhabited regions of southern Turkey and included 179 patients. The participants were illiterate women of low socioeconomic stature and who were under 18 years of age and had married before 18 as well. The mean age of the patients was 64.8±6.3 years and 67.7±6.2 years in nulliparous and great-grand multiparous patients, respectively. The median body mass index (BMI) values of the patients were 30.95±7.0 and 30.11±6.1, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean age and BMI (body mass index). Twenty-eight (18.5%) patients were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, while 3 (10.7%) patients were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the non-delivery group. There was a statistically significant relationship between the two groups in terms of the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (p<0.05). Conclusion: A statistically significant relationship was found between great-grand multiparity and type 2 diabetes mellitus development.

Abstract

Amaç: Great grand multiparite ile tip 2 diabetes mellitus gelişimi arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymayı planladık. Yöntemler: 1 Nisan 2011- 1 Nisan 2012 yılları arasında kadın hastalıkları ve doğum polikliniğine çeşitli şikeyetler ile başvuran hastaların bilgilerine dosyaları geriye doğru taranarak ulaşıldı. Hastaların yaş, boy, kilo, vücut kitle indeksi, doğum sayısı ve diabetes mellitus varlığı not edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 179 hasta dahil edildi. Çalışma Türkiye’nin güney sınırında etnik köken olarak arapların yaşadığı bölgede yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan hastalar, sosyo ekonomik düzeyi düşük, okuma yazma bilmeyen, büyük bir kısmı 18 yaş altı evlenen ve ilk doğumunu 18 yaş altı dönemde yapan kadınlardır. Nullipar ve great-grand multipar hastalarda yaş ortalaması sırasıyla 64,8±6,3 yıl, 67,7±6,2 yıl olarak saptandı. Hastaların ortlama vücut kitle indeksi değerleri sırasıyla 30,95±7,0 ve 30,11±6,1 olarak saptandı. İki grup arasında ortalama yaş ve vücut kitle indeksi açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı. On ve üzere doğum yapan grupta 28 (%18,5) hasta da tip 2 diabetes mellitus, saptanırken, doğum yapmayan grupta tip 2 diabetes mellitus saptanan hasta sayısı 3 (%10,7) olarak bulundu. Her iki grup arasında tip 2 diabetes mellitus gelişimi açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki saptanmıştır (p<0,05). Sonuç: Great grand multipartite ile tip 2 diabetes mellitus gelişimi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki saptanmıştır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDEM, B., PEKER, N. (2019). The Association Between Great-Grand Multiparity and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. JAREM, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 7–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/270382

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Samueloff A, Schimmel MS, Eidelman AI. Grandmultiparity. Is it a perinatal risk? Clin Perinatol 1998; 25: 529-38.
  2. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64: 1-64.
  3. Toohey JS, Keegan KA Jr, Morgan MA, Francis J, Task S, deVeciana M. The "dangerous multipara": fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172(2 Pt 1): 683-6.
  4. Babinszki A, Kerenyi T, Torok O, Grazi V, Lapinski RH, Berkowitz RL. Perinatal outcome in grand and great-grand multiparity: effects of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 669-74.
  5. Mgaya AH, Massawe SN, Kidanto HL, Mgaya HN. Grand multiparity: is it still a risk in pregnancy? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013; 13: 241. Behbehani S, Patenaude V, Abenhaim HA. Maternal Risk Factors and Outcomes of Umbilical Cord Prolapse: A Population-Based Study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016; 38: 23-8.
  6. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300: 1311-6.
  7. Hinkula M, Pukkala E, Kyyrönen P, Kauppila A. Grand multiparity and the risk of breast cancer: population-based study in Finland. Cancer Causes Control 2001; 12: 491-500. Högnäs E, Kauppila A, Pukkala E, Tapanainen JS. Cancer risk in women with 10 or more deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 811-6.
  8. Paltiel O, Tajuddin SM, Polanker Y, Yazdgerdi S, Manor O, Friedlander Y, et al. Grand multiparity and reproductive cancer in the Jerusalem Perinatal Study Cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2016; 27: 237-47.
  9. Hinkula M, Pukkala E, Kyyrönen P, Kauppila A. Grand multiparity and incidence of endometrial cancer: a population-based study in Finland. Int J Cancer 2002; 98: 912-5. Dahlgren J. Pregnancy and insulin resistance. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2006; 4: 149-52.
  10. Kirwan JP, Hauguel-De Mouzon S, Lepercq J, Challier JC, HustonPresley L, Friedman JE, et al. TNF-alpha is a predictor of insulin resistance in human pregnancy. Diabetes 2002; 51: 2207-13.
  11. Rieck S, Kaestner KH. Expansion of beta-cell mass in response to pregnancy. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010; 21: 151-8.
  12. Tian Y, Shen L, Wu J, Chen W, Yuan J, Yang H, et al. Parity and the risk of diabetes mellitus among Chinese women: a cross-sectional evidence from the Tongji-Dongfeng cohort study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e104810. Cure P, Hoffman HJ, Cure-Cure C. Parity and diabetes risk among hispanic women from Colombia: cross-sectional evidence. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2015; 7: 7. Mueller