KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

The Classification of Eye State by Using kNN and MLP Classification Models According to the EEG Signals

KADİR SABANCI
MURAT KÖKLÜ
Sayfa
127–130
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In kNN models, the success rate for 3 nearest neighbor were calculated as 84.05%.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:What is widely used for classification of eye state to detect human’s cognition state is electroencephalography (EEG).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Continuous 14 EEG measurements forms the basic of the dataset.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In kNN models, the success rate for 3 nearest neighbor were calculated as 84.05%.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:14980 sample
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

What is widely used for classification of eye state to detect human’s cognition state is electroencephalography (EEG). In this study, the usage of EEG signals for online eye state detection method was proposed. In this study, EEG eye state dataset that is obtained from UCI machine learning repository database was used. Continuous 14 EEG measurements forms the basic of the dataset. The duration of the measurement is 117 seconds (each measurement has14980 sample). Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) program is used for classification of eye state. Classification success was calculated by using k-Nearest Neighbors algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural networks models. The obtained success of classification methods were compared. The classification success rates were calculated for various number of neurons in the hidden layer of a multilayer perceptron neural network model. The highest classification success rate have been obtained when the number of neurons in the hidden layer was equal to 7. And it was 56.45%. The classification success rates were calculated with k-nearest neighbors algorithm for different neighbourhood values. The highest success was achieved in the classification made with kNN algorithm. In kNN models, the success rate for 3 nearest neighbor were calculated as 84.05%.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SABANCI, K., KÖKLÜ, M. (2015). The Classification of Eye State by Using kNN and MLP Classification Models According to the EEG Signals. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 127–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/270359

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. T. C. Sharma and M. Jain, “WEKA Approach for Comparative Study of Classification Algorithm”, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering Vol. 2, Issue 4, April 2013 [2] O. Roesler and D. Suendermann, “A First Step towards Eye State Prediction Using EEG”. In Proc. of the AIHLS 2013, International Conference on Applied Informatics for Health and Life Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey, September 2013 [3] T. Wang, S. U. Guan, K. L. Man and T. O. Ting, “EEG eye state identification using incremental attribute learning with time-series classification”. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014 [4] O. Fukuda, T. Tsuji, and M. Kaneko, “Pattern classification of EEG signals using a log-linearized Gaussian mixture neural network,” inProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. Part 1 (of 6), pp. 2479– 2484, Perth, Australia, December 1995. [5] M. V. M. Yeo, X. Li, K. Shen, and E. P. V. Wilder-Smith, “Can SVM be used for automatic EEG detection of drowsiness during car driving?” Safety Science, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 115–124, 2009. [6] K. Polat and S. Güneş, “Classification of epileptiform EEG using a hybrid system based on decision tree classifier and fast Fourier transform,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 327–1026, 2007. [7] N. Sulaiman, M. N. Taib, S. Lias, Z. H. Murat, S. A. M. Aris, and N. H. A. Hamid, “Novel methods for stress features identification using EEG signals,” International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2011. [8] M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten, “The WEKA data mining software: an update,” ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 11, pp. 10–18, 2009. [9] A. Frank and A. Asuncion, “UCI machine learning repository”, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml. 2014. [10] T. Wang, S.U. Guan, K.L Man, and T. O. Ting, “EEG Eye State Identification Using Incremental Attribute Learning with Time-Series Classification”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Volume 2014, Article ID 36532, 9 pages [11] M. Sahu, N. K. Nagwani, S. Verma, and S.Shirke, “An Incremental Feature Reordering (IFR) Algorithm to Classify Eye State Identification Using EEG”, Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing Volume 339, 2015, pp 803-811 [12] O. Roesler, L. Bader, J. Forster, Y. Hayashi, S. Hessler, and D. Suendermann-Oeft,