Dergiler / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2

Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Elderly Patients Aged Over 65: ATertiary Center Long-term Results

Sayfa
128–132
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, in patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 month, the decision to place PEG or not should be made carefully.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a method that can be applied for nutritional purposes in patients who cannot be fed orally for various reasons but whose gastrointestinal system functions are normal.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, we aimed to determine the etiological causes and long-term outcomes (efficacy, safety, lifespan) of PEG in patients over 65 years of age.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, in patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 month, the decision to place PEG or not should be made carefully.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a method that can be applied for nutritional purposes in patients who cannot be fed orally for various reasons but whose gastrointestinal system functions are normal. In this study, we aimed to determine the etiological causes and long-term outcomes (efficacy, safety, lifespan) of PEG in patients over 65 years of age. Methods: The data of patients aged 65 years or older who had PEG in our unit between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The demographic information of the patients, the units they are being followed in, the underlying diseases, additional diseases, if any, complications-related to the procedure and the average life span were evaluated. Results: During this period, 140 patients had been PEG inserted. 51% of patients were male and the average age was 73.7±9.2 years, and the average age of women was 76±7.2 years. The most frequent cause of PEG insertion is a neurological disease. PEG insertion was the most common in cerebrovascular events, with a rate of 39%. PEG was implanted in 30% for Alzheimer’s disease, and 14% for malignant reasons. 28% of the patients lived less than a month. In total, 76% of patients died. The average life expectancy of patients who died after PEG was 221.3±330.7 days. Conclusion: PEG is the gold standard in patients with normal gastrointestinal system functions in long-term enteral nutrition. However, in patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 month, the decision to place PEG or not should be made carefully.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKKUZU, M. Z., SEZGİN, O., ÜÇBİLEK, E., AYDIN, F., BALCI, H. R., YARAŞ, S., ÖZDOĞAN, O., ATEŞ, F., ALTINTAŞ, E. (2021). Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Elderly Patients Aged Over 65: ATertiary Center Long-term Results. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 2, 128–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/267745

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:872-5
  2. Kumar S, Langmore S, Goddeau RP Jr, et al. Predictors of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with severe dysphagia from an acute-subacute hemispheric infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;21:114- 20
  3. Beaver ME, Myers JN, Griffenberg L, Waugh K. Percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:1141-4
  4. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med 2001;29:2264- 70
  5. Bassem YS, Jeffrey MM, Jeffrey LP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastros- tomy. Lightdale CJ, (eds). Gastrointestinal endoscopy, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company 1998;551-63
  6. Fortunato JE, Troy AL, Cuffari C, et al. Outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children and young adults. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010;50:390-3
  7. Srinivasan R, Irvine T, Dalzell M. Indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and procedure-related outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2009;49:584-8
  8. Ekin N, Uçmak F, Oruç M, Tuncer ET, Yalçın K. Perkutan endoskopik gastrostomi uygulama sonuçlarımız: 113 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2015;42:346-9
  9. Alper E, Baydar B, Arı FÖ, et al. Perkütan endoskopik gastroenterostomi uygulama deneyimlerimiz: Endikasyon ve komplikasyonlar. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi 2009;8:74-6 10. Ermis F, Ozel M, Oncu K, et al. Indications, complications and long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A retrospective study. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2012;124:148-53
  10. Nadir I, Türkay C. Uzun Süreli Enteral Beslenmede Etkili ve Güvenilir Yaklaşım: Perkütan Endoskopik Gastrostomi. Güncel Gastroenteroloji 2011;15:95-7
  11. Nicholson FB, Korman MG, Richardson MA. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review of indications, complications and outcome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15:21-5
  12. Skelly RH, Kupfer RM, Metcalfe ME, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): change in practice since 1988. Clin Nutr 2002;21:389-94
  13. Kobayashi K, Cooper GS, Chak A, Sivak MV Jr, Wong RC. A prospective evaluation of outcome in patients referred for PEG placement. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:500-6
  14. Erdil A, Tüzün A, Saka M, ve ark. Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi uygulamalarımız ve sonuçları. Gülhane Tıp