KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2010 / Sayı: 3

The Graduate Students? Multiple Intelligence Profile and Their Education Routes

Gönül GÜNEŞ
Tuba GÖKÇEK
Sayfa
120–130
Yayın Tarihi
2010-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was also concluded that interpersonal, bodily-kinesthetic and naturalist MI types in science education (SE) department students were more advanced than the students in mathematics education (ME) department on the other hand spatial MI types in CITE students were more stronger than the graduate students in mathematics education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz The determination and evaluation of the individual differences, skills and their deficient or competent areas are seemed to be necessary for effective learning.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this framework, the sample of the study was comprised of total 160 graduate students. ?Multiple Intelligence Self Evaluation Scale? was used as a data collection tool.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was also concluded that interpersonal, bodily-kinesthetic and naturalist MI types in science education (SE) department students were more advanced than the students in mathematics education (ME) department on the other hand spatial MI types in CITE students were more stronger than the graduate students in mathematics education.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler Graduate Students · Education · Multiple Intelligence Theory

Özet

Öz The determination and evaluation of the individual differences, skills and their deficient or competent areas are seemed to be necessary for effective learning. With this regard, following study aimed to examine the multiple intelligence types of the graduate students at the Secondary Science and Mathematics Education and Computer and Instructional Technologies Education main fields connected to Karadeniz Technical University (K.T.U) Graduate School of Natural Science. In this framework, the sample of the study was comprised of total 160 graduate students. ?Multiple Intelligence Self Evaluation Scale? was used as a data collection tool. According to the results gained from students? self evaluation with the Likert type scale, multiple intelligences types of graduate students at the department of science, mathematics, computer and instructional technologies education (CITE) have enhanced at medium and above level. Results indicated that there is a meaningful difference between the multiple intelligence (MI) types of the students in different departments. It was also concluded that interpersonal, bodily-kinesthetic and naturalist MI types in science education (SE) department students were more advanced than the students in mathematics education (ME) department on the other hand spatial MI types in CITE students were more stronger than the graduate students in mathematics education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNEŞ, G., GÖKÇEK, T. (2010). The Graduate Students? Multiple Intelligence Profile and Their Education Routes. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 3, 120–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/266518

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom. (2. Edition) Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Azar, A. (2006). Lisede seçilen alan ve ÖSS alan puanları ile çoklu zekâ profilleri arasindaki ilişki [Relationship of multiple intelligences profiles with area of concentration in high school and university entrance exam scores]. Theory and Practice of Educational Management, 46, 157174. Azar, A., Presley, A. İ. & Balkaya, Ö. (2006). Çoklu zekâ kuramına dayalı öğretimin öğrencilerin başarı, tutum, hatırlama ve bilişsel süreç becerilerine etkisi [Effect of multiple intelligence theory based instruction on students' achievement, attitude, retention, and process skills]. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 30, 45-54.
  2. Balım, A. G. (2006). Fen konularının çoklu zeka kuramına dayalı öğretiminin öğrencilerin başarılarına ve kalıcılığa etkisi [Teaching science subjects based on the theory of multiple intelligence to the students’ success and the effect of its permanence]. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 23, 10-19.
  3. Baum, S., Viens, J., & Slatin, B. (2005). Multiple intelligences in the elementary classroom: A Teacher's Toolkit. New York: Teachers College Press.
  4. Demirci, N. & Yağcı, Z. (2008). Fen bilgisi dersi “yaşamımızı yönlendiren elektrik” ünitesinin çoklu zeka kuramı etkinliklerine göre değerlendirilmesi [Evaluating the unit of “how effect electricity in our lives” in science course by multiple intelligent theory based activities]. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 4 (1), 79-97.
  5. Demirel, Ö. (2004). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme-öğretme sanatı [The art of planning and assessing in teaching]. Ankara:
  6. Pegema Publishing. Demirtaş, Z. & Duran, A. (2007). İlköğretim okulu 6., 7. ve 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin çoklu zekâ alanlarının gelişmişlik düzeyleri [Elementary school 6th, 7th and 8 grade students’ development level of multiple intelligence areas]. Electronic Social Science Journal, 6(20), 208-220. Retrieved from http://www.e-sosder.com/dergi/20208-220.pdf in February 12, 2009.
  7. Doğan, Y. & Alkış, S. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sosyal bilgiler derslerinde çoklu zekâ alanlarını kullanabilmelerine yönelik görüşleri [Classroom teacher candidates views of using multiple intelligence areas in social studies courses]. Uludag University Faculty of Education Journal, XX(2), 327-339.
  8. Durmaz, H. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının çoklu zekâ kuramına dayalı fen bilgisi öğretimi uygulaması