Dergiler / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2013 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Emotional Reactivity Scale Adaptation to Turkish Culture: Reliability and Validity Study

-

Sayfa
77–89
Yayın Tarihi
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is suggested that studies on reliability and validity of Emotional reactivity scale on adolescents can be made in future researches

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to adapt Emotional Reactivity Scale developed by Mathew and his friends (2008) to the Turkish culture.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Study group of the research consists of 290 male and 275 female with a total of 565 undergraduate students studying in Erzurum Ataturk University, in the academic year 2012-2013.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is suggested that studies on reliability and validity of Emotional reactivity scale on adolescents can be made in future researches
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Emotional reactivity · reliability · validity

Özet

The purpose of this study is to adapt Emotional Reactivity Scale developed by Mathew and his friends (2008) to the Turkish culture. Emotional reactivity has been described as an important factor in interpersonal relations, and in individual's psychological alignment. For this reason, adaptation of "Emotional Reactivity Scale" to the Turkish culture is considered important. This research is the work of a scale adaptation. Study group of the research consists of 290 male and 275 female with a total of 565 undergraduate students studying in Erzurum Ataturk University, in the academic year 2012-2013. Since the research is a scale adaptation work, it is translated into English, which is primarily dominated by two academics has been adapted into Turkish, and has been translated into English again by a different scholar. After establishing language, the validity of the scale and reliability of the analysis are examined. In order to determine the construct validity of the scale, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed and KMO .871, Bartlett test χ2 value of 864.937 (p <.001) are found. In addition, three-factor structure was obtained that describes the 49.772 % of the total variance. Item-factor structure obtained from the EFA has been tested for compliance with a model by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Based on this, three-factor structure of the Emotional Reactivity Scale has been validated. (X2 = 179.29, df = 127, p = .00, X2 / df = 1.41). When looked at fit indices of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) RMSEA=.066, RMR= .012, NFI=.90, CFI=.94, IFI=.94, RFI=.91, AGFI=.90, GFI=.90 are found. The coefficient of the total internal consistency is found .91, sensitivity subscale is .86, emotional reactivity subscale is .76 and psychological durability subscale is found.81 in the scale which is made to determine reliability of the scale and it is found that scale has internal consistency. As a result of the EFA and CFA applied for adaptation of Emotional Reactivity scale to the Turkish culture, it can be said that the scale is a reliable and valid measurement tool. It is suggested that studies on reliability and validity of Emotional reactivity scale on adolescents can be made in future researches

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to adapt Emotional Reactivity Scale developed by Mathew and his friends (2008) to the Turkish. Emotional reactivity has been described as an important factor in interpersonal relations, and in individual's psychological alignment. For this reason, adaptation of "Emotional Reactivity Scale" to the Turkish is considered important. This research is the work of a scale adaptation. Study group of the research consists of 290 male and 275 female with a total of 565 undergraduate students studying in Erzurum Ataturk University, in the academic year 2012-2013. Since the research is a scale adaptation work, it is translated into English, which is primarily dominated by * Arş. Gör. Atatürk Üni., K.K.Eğitim Fakültesi, PDR A.B.D,[email protected]** Öğr. Gör. Ağrı İbrahim Çeçen Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, PDR A.B.D, [email protected]*** Doç. Dr. Atatürk Üniversitesi, K.K.Eğitim Fakültesi, PDR A.B.D, [email protected] academics has been adapted into Turkish, and has been translated into English again by a different scholar. After establishing language, the validity of the scale and reliability of the analysis are examined. In order to determine the construct validity of the scale, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed and KMO .871, Bartlett test χ2 value of 864.937 (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEÇER, İ., HALMATOV, S., GENÇDOĞAN, B. (2013). Emotional Reactivity Scale Adaptation to Turkish Culture: Reliability and Validity Study. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 77–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/265632

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Akbulut, Y.(2010). Sosyal bilimlerde SPSS uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal & Kültür Yayıncılık Beck, A. T.,Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J.,&Erbaugh, J. (1961). An ınventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571
  2. Brown, M.W.(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, KA.; Long, JS., (Ed). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık. Byrne, B., Campbell, L.(1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 30, 555-574.
  4. Cavanagh, J. T., Carson, A. J., Sharpe, M., & Lawrie, S. M. (2003). Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 33, 395–405.
  5. Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  6. Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Teti, L. O. D. (1994). The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: a clinical perspective. In N. A. Fox (Ed.), The Development of emotion regulation: Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. Conklin, C. Z., Bradley, R., & Westen, D. (2006). Affect regulation in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194, 69–7
  7. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş.(2012). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli SPSS ve LİSREL uygulamaları. Ankara:
  8. PegemA Yayıncılık Davidson, R. J., Lewis, D. A., Alloy, L. B., Amaral, D. G., Bush, G., Cohen, J. D. (2002). Neural and behavioral substrates of mood and mood regulation. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 478–502.
  9. Engeler, A., Yargıç, L. (2007). Kişiler arası tepkisellik indeksi: Empatinin çok boyutlu ölçümü. New Symposium Journal, 45(3), 119-127
  10. Field, A.(2005). Discovering statistic using SPSS for Windows. London: SAGE Publications. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362
  11. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6,1−55-65.
  12. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software Internatio