Dergiler / Journal of Life Economics / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE FOR FDI INFLOW IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Sayfa
1–16
Yayın Tarihi
2014-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A significant time trend is also witnessed

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper assesses the importance of infrastructure availability in the host developing country in increasing its attractiveness for overseas investors.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using annual data for a panel of 90 developing countries over the years 1980-2007, I found that consistent with the prediction of the market size hypothesis, population is found to have a significant positive effect on inward FDI.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A significant time trend is also witnessed
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:FDI · Infrastructure · Market Size

Özet

This paper assesses the importance of infrastructure availability in the host developing country in increasing its attractiveness for overseas investors. I also take into account market size, economic development, macroeconomic stability, regional and income groupings, ability of the people to speak an international language and access to sea. Using annual data for a panel of 90 developing countries over the years 1980-2007, I found that consistent with the prediction of the market size hypothesis, population is found to have a significant positive effect on inward FDI. Sound macroeconomic management proxied by exchange rate and economic development have plausible significant effects on FDI inflows, whereas, high inflation signalling economic disorder deter foreign investors. Infrastructure availability measured through telephone-density positively influence overseas investors location choice. Though, it is sensitive to alternative proxy measures but robust with respect to specification of the estimating model. Language and geographic location dummies confirm that foreign firms prefer Anglophones, and are reluctant to invest in South Asia, MENA and Francophone countries. A significant time trend is also witnessed

Abstract

This paper assesses the importance of infrastructure availability in the host developing country in increasing its attractiveness for overseas investors. I also take into account market size, economic development, macroeconomic stability, regional and income groupings, ability of the people to speak an international language and access to sea. Using annual data for a panel of 90 developing countries over the years 1980-2007, I found that consistent with the prediction of the market size hypothesis, population is found to have a significant positive effect on inward FDI. Sound macroeconomic management proxied by exchange rate and economic development have plausible significant effects on FDI inflows, whereas, high inflation signalling economic disorder deter foreign investors. Infrastructure availability measured through telephone-density positively influence overseas investors location choice. Though, it is sensitive to alternative proxy measures but robust with respect to specification of the estimating model. Language and geographic location dummies confirm that foreign firms prefer Anglophones, and are reluctant to invest in South Asia, MENA and Francophone countries. A significant time trend is also witnessed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SHAH, M. H. (2014). THE SIGNIFICANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE FOR FDI INFLOW IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/2630

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. AIZENMAN, J. and SPIEGEL, M.M., 2006.
  2. Institutional Efficiency, Monitoring Costs and the Investment Share of FDI. Review of International Economics, 14(4), pp. 683-697.
  3. ASIEDU, E., 2002. On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries: Is Africa Different? World Development, 30(1), pp. 107-119.
  4. ASIEDU, E., 2004. Policy Reform and Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: Absolute Progress but Relative Decline. Development Policy Review, 22(1), pp. 41-48.
  5. ASIEDU, E., 2006. Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: The Role of Natural Resources, Market Size, Government Policy, Institutions and Political Instability. The World Economy, 29(1), pp. 63-77.
  6. ASTERIOU, D., 2006. Applied Econometrics: A Modern Approach using EViews and Microfit. First edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. BALASUBRAMANYAM, V.N., SAPSFORD, D. and GRIFFITHS, D., 2002. Regional Integration Agreements and Foreign Direct Investment: Theory and Preliminary Evidence. Manchester School (14636786), 70(3), pp. 460-482.
  7. BALASUBRAMANYAM, V. and SAPSFORD, D., 2001. FDI and the WTO. Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department. BLONIGEN, B.A., 2006. Foreign Direct Investment Behavior of Multinational Corporations. Winter 11-4. National Bureau of Economic Research Reporter. BRAGA NONNENBERG, M.J. and CARDOSO MENDONCA, M.J., 2004. The Determinants of Direct Foreign Investment in Developing Countries. SSRN eLibrary,. CAMPOS, N.F. and KINOSHITA, Y., 2003. Why Does FDI Go Where it Goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies. International Monetary Fund. CARR, D.L., MARKUSEN, J.R. and MASKUS, K.E., 2001. Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise. American Economic Review, 91(3), pp. 693-708. CIEŚLIK, A., 2005a. Location of Foreign Firms and National Border Effects: The Case of Poland. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(3), pp. 287-297. CIEŚLIK, A., 2005b. Regional Characteristics and the Location of Foreign Firms within Poland. Applied Economics, 37(8), pp. 863-874.
  8. FEENSTRA, R.C., 1998. Facts and Fallacies about Foreign Direct Investment. California Davis Department of Economics. HAILE, G.A. and ASSEFA, H., 2006. Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Ethiopia: A Time-Series Analysis. 4th International Conference on the Ethiopian Economy., 10-12 Jun 2006 2006.
  9. HARMS, P. and URSPRUNG, H., 2001. Do Civil and Political Repression Really Boost Foreign Direct Investments? CESifo Working Paper No. 421. CESifo Group Munich