KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

A Combined HOTS-Based Assessment/STEM Learning Model to Improve Secondary Students’ Thinking Skills: A Development and Evaluation Study

Undang ROSİDİN
Agus SUYANTA
Abdurrahman ABDURRAHMAN
Sayfa
435–448
Yayın Tarihi
2019-09-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Keywords: STEM learning model, HOTS-based assessment, research and development, secondary students

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:An integrated STEM education has been used for a long time to improve Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The result showed a significant difference between two treatments (t-value = 4.63; p < 0.001).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Keywords: STEM learning model, HOTS-based assessment, research and development, secondary students
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:STEM Learning Model · HOTS-Based Assessment · Research and Development

Abstract

An integrated STEM education has been used for a long time to improve Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of students. This skills covered the capability to analyze, evaluate, and create which can be enhanced by implementing a right learning model, materials, and assessment. This study aims to develop and evaluate a combined HOTS-based assessment/STEM learning model to improve the students’ thinking skills. A proposed model was designed by following the seven steps of Borg & Gall research and development. The impact of this model was evaluated by analyzing the average gain of pretest-posttest and Tukey signification difference test compared to a conventional STEM model. The result showed a significant difference between two treatments (t-value = 4.63; p < 0.001). It also conform a better improvements of students’ thinking skills by our model based on the analysis of gain score distribution. Keywords: STEM learning model, HOTS-based assessment, research and development, secondary students

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ROSİDİN, U., SUYANTA, A., ABDURRAHMAN, A. (2019). A Combined HOTS-Based Assessment/STEM Learning Model to Improve Secondary Students’ Thinking Skills: A Development and Evaluation Study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 435–448. https://ajindex.com/articles/262430

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Anderson, O. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing. Newyork: Addison Wesley Longman. Barnett, J. E., & Francis, A. L. (2012). Using Higher Order Thinking Questions to Foster Critical Thinking: A Classroom Study. Educational Psychology, 32(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.638619
  2. Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011).
  3. Integrative Approaches among Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects on Students Learning: A Meta Analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5). Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current Perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5–9.
  4. Guilford, J. (1956). Fundamental Statistic in Psychology and Education.3rd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. Guo, S., Freeman, S., Lawhorn, J., & Zheng, A. (2008). 1018 Free Access to Landsat Imagery Teach by the Book Science Education: Science, 320(5879), 1011–1012. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.320.5879.1011a
  5. Hake, R. R. (2001). Lesson from the Physics-Education Reform Effort. Conservation Ecology, 1–61.
  6. Kaya, D., & Aydın, H. (2016). Elementary Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions and Lived Experiences on Mathematical Communication. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6), 1619–1629. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1203a
  7. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4). Kristianingsih, D. D., Wijayati, N., & Sudarmin. (2016). Pengembangan LKS Fisika Bermuatan Generik Sains untuk Meningkatkan Higher Order Thinking (HOTS) Siswa. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 5(1), 73–82.
  8. McNeill, M., Gosper, M., & Xu, J. (2012). Assessment Choices to Target Higher Order Learning Outcomes: the Power of Academic Empowerment. Research in Learning Technology, 20(0). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.17595
  9. Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM Education Monograph Series: Attributes of STEM Education. Baltimorc: MD: TIES. Narayanan, S., & Adithan, M. (2015). Analysis Of Question Papers In Engineering Courses With Respect To Hots (Higher Order Thinking Skills). American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajee.v6i1.9247
  10. Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment of Student. Boston: Pearson Education. OECD. (2015). Pisa 2015.
  11. Sanders, M. (2009).
  12. STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4). Sanders, M., Kwo