KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Life Economics / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

POWER OF THE PURSE PERCEPTION OF VOTERS IN TURKEY AND AFFECTING FACTORS

Ufuk Selen
Ahmet Bora Tarhan
Sayfa
1–18
Yayın Tarihi
2015-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Also it has beendiscussed in the study that 6 factors have been effective for the result and that they have the same andpositive effects on this perception.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to analyze the perception of voters.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A scale of 45 statements has been used to measure the perception of the voters.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Also it has beendiscussed in the study that 6 factors have been effective for the result and that they have the same andpositive effects on this perception.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Public Budget · Power of the Purse · Political Process

Özet

This study aims to analyze the perception of voters. It attempts to answer whether the power of purse defined at the constitutional level has been internalized and used functionally by the voters or not. A scale of 45 statements has been used to measure the perception of the voters. Factor and regression analyses have been conducted on the data obtained from the scale and the power of purse perception not functi level of the voters has been investigated.The results of the study put forward that voters in Turkey can onally use the power of purse that they get by the constitution. Also it has beendiscussed in the study that 6 factors have been effective for the result and that they have the same andpositive effects on this perception.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the perception of voters. It attempts to answer whether the power ofpurse defined at the constitutional level has been internalized and used functionally by the voters ornot. A scale of 45 statements has been used to measure the perception of the voters. Factor andregression analyses have been conducted on the data obtained from the scale and the power of purseperception not functi level of the voters has been investigated.The results of the study put forward thatvoters in Turkey can onally use the power of purse that they get by the constitution. Also it has beendiscussed in the study that 6 factors have been effective for the result and that they have the same andpositive effects on this perception.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Selen, U., Tarhan, A. B. (2015). POWER OF THE PURSE PERCEPTION OF VOTERS IN TURKEY AND AFFECTING FACTORS. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 1–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/2618

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. BLONDEL, Jean (1995),
  2. Comparative Government, London, New York, Prentice Hall. CLEVELAND, Frederick A., (1914) Constitutional Provision for a Budget, Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 141-188. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1193340. Accessed: 27/09/2012
  3. HARRUP, Martin & BRESLIN, Shaun (1998),
  4. Comparative Government and Politics, Houndsmill, Macmillan Press.
  5. KALAYCI, Şeref (2008), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara:
  6. Asil Yayın Dağıtım. LIENERT, I. (2005)‘Who Controls the Budget:The Legislature or the Executive?’IMFWorking Paper,WP/05/115. MEYERS, R.T. (2001) ‘Will the US Congress’s “Power of the Purse”Become Unexceptional?, American Political Science Association, San Francisco. MICHAEL M. Ting, (2001) The "Power of the Purse”and Its Implications for Bureaucratic Policy-Making”, Public Choice, Vol. 106, No. 3/4, pp. 243-274v http://www.jstor.org/stable/30026219. Accessed: 24/09/2012 NELSON C. DOMETRIUS and Deil S. WRIGHT, (2010)
  7. Governors, Legislatures, and State Budgets across Time, Political Research Quarterly, DOI: 10.1177/1065912909334428. http://prq.sagepub.com/content/early/ 2009/04/10/ 1065912909334428 PANITCH, Leo (2000), “Degisen Dünyada Devlet: Küresel Kapitalizmi Sosyal Demokratlaştırmak?”, Üçüncü Yol Arayısları ve Türkiye, Yay. Hz. Ve Çev: M. C. Yalçıntan, Büke Yayınları,
  8. İstanbul.
  9. PHILIPS, Hood & JACKSON, Paul (1987), Constitutional and Administrative Law, London, Sweet & Maxwell. PIERSON, Christopher (2004),
  10. The Modern State, Routledge, Second Edition,
  11. London and New York. WEHNER, Joachim (2006) Assessing the Power of the Purse: An Index of Legislative Budget Institutions, Political Studies: 2006 VOL 54, 767–785
  12. LU, Yı, and XUE, Chenghaı (2011),The Power Of The Purse And Budgetary Accountabılıty: Experıences From Subnatıonal Governments In Chına, Public Administration And Development, 31, pp. 351–362. (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/pad.604. FALAY, Nihat (1997), “Türkiye’nin 1997 Yılı Bütçesi Eleştiri ve Öneriler”, İktisat Dergisi, S: 363. GÖZÜBÜYÜK, A. S. (2000),
  13. Anayasa Hukuku, Turhan Kitabevi,
  14. Ankara.
  15. CANBAY, T. Güneş Ç. GERGER, (2012), “Batı’da Bütçe Hakkının Gelişiminin Toplumsal Yapının Degişimi Üzerine Etkileri”, Mali Sosyoloji Üzerine Denemeler, (Ed: Kemal ÇELEBİ), T.C. Maliye Bakanlığı Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlıgı Yayın No: 2012/418, ss. 159-195.
  16. TEKELİ, İ. (2005), “Katılımcı Demokrasi, Sivil Aglar ve Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları”, Türkiye’de Si