Dergiler / Journal of Life Economics / 2015 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4

THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF GROWING ANTISMOKING ATTITUDES IN TURKEY: AT THE FRAMEWORK OF GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS

Sayfa
77–87
Yayın Tarihi
2015-10-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

And also this study indicates that if consumer demand for tobacco goods hadn’t been changed, industrial output could have increased nearly 98%.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to investigate the effects of changing smoking attitudes as income grows on the output level of the tobacco industry and on the share of tobacco goods in household budget in Turkey for the period of 2004-2014 using GTAP general equilibrium model.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Our analysis indicates that the share of tobacco product in household budget decreases 21% with economic growth between 2004-2014 and also this rate in household budget declines almost 50% with anti-smoking attitudes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:And also this study indicates that if consumer demand for tobacco goods hadn’t been changed, industrial output could have increased nearly 98%.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2004-2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Income Elasticity of Demand · Computable General Equilibrium · Income Elasticity of Demand

Özet

This study aims to investigate the effects of changing smoking attitudes as income grows on the output level of the tobacco industry and on the share of tobacco goods in household budget in Turkey for the period of 2004-2014 using GTAP general equilibrium model. Our analysis indicates that the share of tobacco product in household budget decreases 21% with economic growth between 2004-2014 and also this rate in household budget declines almost 50% with anti-smoking attitudes. And also this study indicates that if consumer demand for tobacco goods hadn’t been changed, industrial output could have increased nearly 98%.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of changing smoking attitudes as income grows on the output level of the tobacco industry and on the share of tobacco goods in household budget in Turkey for the period of 2004-2014 using GTAP general equilibrium model. Our analysis indicates that the share of tobacco product in household budget decreases 21% with economic growth between 2004-2014 and also this rate in household budget declines almost 50% with anti-smoking attitudes. And also this study indicates that if consumer demand for tobacco goods hadn’t been changed, industrial output could have increased nearly 98%.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Pişkin, M. (2015). THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF GROWING ANTISMOKING ATTITUDES IN TURKEY: AT THE FRAMEWORK OF GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS. Journal of Life Economics, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 4, 77–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/2611

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Arndt, C., 1996, An Introduction to Systematic Sensitivity Analysis via Gaussian Quadratuna, Technical Paper, GTAP Resource. Arndt, C., 1997, China in 2005: Implications for the Rest of the World, Journal of Economic Integration, 12(4) December, 505-547.
  2. Bobak, M., Prabhat, J., Son N., and Martin J., 2000,
  3. Poverty and Smoking, Edited by PhabhatJha and Frank Chaloupka, Tobacco Control in DevelopingCountries, Oxford: Oxford University Press,
  4. New York, ISBN: 0192632507 Burfisher, M., 2011, Introduction to Computable General Equilibrium Models, Cambridge University Press,
  5. New York, ISBN:9780521139779 Dagli, E., 1999, Are low Income Countries Targets of the Tobacco Industry?, InternationalTuberculos Lung Dısease, 3(2):113–118.
  6. Deaton, A., 2002, Policy Implications of the Gradient of Health and Wealth, Health Affairs, 21(2):13-30.
  7. Goel, R., Nelson, M., 2006, The Effectıveness of Antı-Smokıng Legıslatıon: a Revıew, Journal of Economıc Surveys, Vol. 20, No. 3. Hertel, T.W.,1997, Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge University Press,
  8. New York, ISBN:978-0521643740
  9. Kenkel, D., Schmeiser, M. and Urban, C., 2014, Is Smoking Inferior? Evidence from Variation in the Earned Income Tax Credit, NBER Working Paper, No: 20097 Kilic, D., Oztürk, S., 2014, Gender Differences in Cigarette Consumption in Turkey: Evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey, Health Policy, Volume 114, Issues 2–3, February 2014, 207–214.
  10. Mas-Colell, A., D. Whinston, M., and R. Green, J., 1995,
  11. Microeconomic Theory, New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press,
  12. New York, ISBN:9780195102680 Peck, R. M., 2011,
  13. Equity Issues, Tobacco, and the Poor, Edited by AydaYurekli and Joy de Beyer, World Bank Economics of Tobacco Toolkit. Tansel, A., 1993,
  14. Cigarette Demand, Health Scares and Education in Turkey, Applied Economics, 25:4, 521-529
  15. Townsend, Joy L., 1987,
  16. Cigarette Tax, Economic Welfare and Social Class Patterns of Smoking, Applied Economics, 19:3, 355-365.
  17. Warner, K., 1977, The Effects of the Anti-Smoking Campaign On Cigarette Consumption, AJPH, Vol. 67, No, 7. WHO, 2015, Global trends and projections for tobacco use, 1990–2025:an analysis of smoking indicators from the WHOComprehensive Information Systems for Tobacco Control, 2015; 385: 966–76. World Bank, 2013, Global Trends in Tobacco Use, http://web.worldbank.org/wbsite/external/topics/exthealthnutritionandpopulation/
  18. Yurekli, A., Onder, Z., Elibol, H.M., Erk, N., Cabuk, A., Fisunoglu, M., Erk, S.F.,Wasserman, J., Willard