KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Research on Brain Signals via Artificial Neural Network and Swarm Intelligence Algorithms

Sema YİLDİRİM
Hasan Erdinç KOÇER
A.hakan EKMEKCİ
Sayfa
27–37
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Experimental results demonstrate that combined SI and MLPNN algorithm has been increased the success of BP algorithm by avoiding local minima.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) that are the ability to learn from theirs environment in order to improve their performance are widely used in numerous applications.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To avoid this problem, we proposed an ANNs and Swarm Intelligence (SI) method, where Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms were operated for the Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN) weights update.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Experimental results demonstrate that combined SI and MLPNN algorithm has been increased the success of BP algorithm by avoiding local minima.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Swarm intelligence · artificial neural networks · backpropagation

Abstract

Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) that are the ability to learn from theirs environment in order to improve their performance are widely used in numerous applications. The Backpropagation (BP) Algorithm is one of the most popular and effective model of ANNs. However, since it uses gradient descent algorithm which attempts to minimize the error of the network by moving gradient of the error curve, easily get trapped at local minima. To avoid this problem, we proposed an ANNs and Swarm Intelligence (SI) method, where Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms were operated for the Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN) weights update. Two Electroencephalogram (EEG) datasets were used to test the success of all algorithms including ABC-MLPNN, PSO-MLPNN and conventional-MLPNN. Compared to conventional-MLPNN, higher success values were obtained on each dataset with the proposed methods. Experimental results demonstrate that combined SI and MLPNN algorithm has been increased the success of BP algorithm by avoiding local minima.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YİLDİRİM, S., KOÇER, H. E., EKMEKCİ, A. (2019). Research on Brain Signals via Artificial Neural Network and Swarm Intelligence Algorithms. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 27–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/258054

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. W. G. Baxt, “Use of an artificial neural network for data analysis in clinical decision-making: the diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion,” Neural Comput., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 480–489, 1990. Reference 2. I. Gule, E. D. Ubeyli, and N. F. Guler, “A mixture of experts network structure for EEG signals classification,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005. IEEE-EMBS 2005. 27th Annual International Conference of the, 2006, pp. 2707–2710. Reference 3. E. D. Übeyli, “Lyapunov exponents/probabilistic neural networks for analysis of EEG signals,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 985–992, 2010. Reference 4. G. Chandrashekar and F. Sahin, “A survey on feature selection methods,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 16–28, 2014. Reference 5. I. Guyon and A. Elisseeff, “An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1157–1182, 2003. Reference 6. E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, and T. M. Jessell, Principles of neural science, vol. 4. McGraw-Hill New York, 2000. Reference 7. H. Adeli, Z. Zhou, and N. Dadmehr, “Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform,” J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 69–87, 2003. Reference 8. L. D. Iasemidis et al., “Adaptive epileptic seizure prediction system,” Biomed. Eng. IEEE Trans., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 616–627, 2003. Reference 9. W. O. Tatum IV, “Long-term EEG monitoring: a clinical approach to electrophysiology,” J. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 442–455, 2001. Reference 10. L. Guo, D. Rivero, and A. Pazos, “Epileptic seizure detection using multiwavelet transform based approximate entropy and artificial neural networks,” J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 156–163, 2010. Reference 11. K. Fu, J. Qu, Y. Chai, and Y. Dong, “Classification of seizure based on the time-frequency image of EEG signals using HHT and SVM,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 13, pp. 15–22, Sep. 2014. Reference 12. V. Joshi, R. B. Pachori, and A. Vijesh, “Classification of ictal and seizure-free EEG signals using fractional linear prediction,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 9, pp. 1–5, Jan. 2014. Reference 13. T. Gandhi, B. K. Panigrahi, and S. Anand, “A comparative study of wavelet families for EEG signal classification,” Neurocomputing, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 3051–3057, Oct. 2011. Reference 14. S.-H. Lee, J. S. Lim, J.-K. Kim, J. Yang, and Y. Lee, “Classification of normal and epileptic seizure EEG signals using wavelet tra