KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Preconcentration of Fe III Using Fe III -Ion Imprinted Polymeric Traps and Its Analytical Performance for FAAS

Muharrem KARABÖRK
Arzu ERSÖZ
Ebru BİRLİK
Rıdvan SAY
Sayfa
135–142
Yayın Tarihi
2007-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The Fe III -imprintedpoly MAAP-EGDMA beads could be used many times without decreasing their adsorption capacities significantly

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Novel Fe III -imprinted beads were prepared by molecular imprinting technique for selective solid-phase extraction SPE of Fe III ions prior to its determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry FAAS .
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:MAAP was synthesized using methacryloylchloride, 4-aminoantipyrine andpyridine.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Fe III -imprintedpoly MAAP-EGDMA beads could be used many times without decreasing their adsorption capacities significantly
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Ion imprinting IIP · FAAS · Fe III ion

Abstract

Novel Fe III -imprinted beads were prepared by molecular imprinting technique for selective solid-phase extraction SPE of Fe III ions prior to its determination by flame atomic absorption spectrometry FAAS . The functional metalcomplexing monomer and crosslinking monomer used were methacrylamidoantipyrine MAAP and ethyleneglycoldimethacrylate EGDMA , respectively. MAAP was synthesized using methacryloylchloride, 4-aminoantipyrine andpyridine. Fe III ions were complexed with MAAP and the Fe III -imprinted poly MAAP-EGDMA beads were synthesized by suspension polymerization. After that, the template ions i.e., Fe III ions were removed using 4.0 M HNO3solution. The specific surface area of the Fe III -imprinted and non-imprinted poly MAAP-EGDMA beads was foundto be 1181.45 m2/g and 437.94 m2/g, respectively. The swelling ratio was 60% and 47% for imprinted and non-imprintedbeads, respectively. According to the elemental analysis results, the beads contained 119.0 µmol MAAP/g polymer.The maximum adsorption capacity, optimum pH and equilibrium binding time were 29.32 mg/g, 4.0 and 80 min, respectively. Selectivity coefficients for Al III , Cu II , Zn II and Co II ions were compared with Fe III ion. Fe III -imprinted beads showed the following order of metal ion affinity: Fe III >Zn II >Cu II >Co II >Al III . The Fe III -imprintedpoly MAAP-EGDMA beads could be used many times without decreasing their adsorption capacities significantly

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARABÖRK, M., ERSÖZ, A., BİRLİK, E., SAY, R. (2007). Preconcentration of Fe III Using Fe III -Ion Imprinted Polymeric Traps and Its Analytical Performance for FAAS. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 135–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/256281

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. R.A. Goyer. Toxic effects of metals. In:Klaassen CD, ed. Casarett & Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons. 5th ed. New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1996, 715-716.
  2. W.F.Greentree, J.O. Hall. Iron toxicosis. In Bonagura JD, ed. Kirk’s current therapy XII small an imal practice. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co, 1995, 240-242. R.J. Williams. Biomineralization: Iron and the origins of life. Nature, 1990, 343, 213-214.
  3. J. Albretsen., The toxicity of iron, an essential ele- ment, DVM, PhD, DABT, DABVT FEBRUARY 2006 Veterinary Medicine, 82-90.
  4. R.B.Martin, Clin Chem., 1986, 32 (10) 1797–1806.
  5. T.L. Litovitz., B.F. Schmitz., N. Matyunas., T.G.Martin. 1987 annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers National Data Collection Sys- tem. Am J Emerg Med., 1988, 6(5) 479–515
  6. P. Kovacheva., R. Djingova, Anal.Chim. Acta, 2002, 464 (1), 7-13
  7. L.Elçi., S. Saraçoğlu, Talanta, 1998, 1305-1310.
  8. R.Shukla, G.N. Rao, Talanta, 2002, 57 (4), 633-639.
  9. B.L.Gong, X. Li., F. Wang, X. Chang, Talanta, 2000, 52(2), 217–223.
  10. X. Chang, X.Yang, X.Wei. and K.Wu., Analytica Chimica Acta, 2001, 450, 231-238.
  11. X. Chang, Q. Su., D. Liang., X. Wei., B.Wang, Talanta, 2002, 57, 253–261.
  12. A. Sanz-Mendel, M.D.F. Campa, E.B.Gonzalez, M.L. Fernadez-Sanchez, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1999, 54, 251–287.
  13. A. Arpadjan., L. Vuchkova, E. Kostadinova, Analyst, 1997, 122, 243–246.
  14. J. Ruzicka, A. Arndal, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1989, 216, 243-255.
  15. S.J. Moyano, A. Gasquez., R. Olsina, E.Marchevsky, L.D. Martinez, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1999, 14, 259– 262. S.D. Çekiç., H. Filik., R. Apak., Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004, 505, 15–24.
  16. Y. Liu, X. Chang, S. Wang, Y. Guo, B. Din, S. Meng, Talanta, 2004, 64, 160–166.
  17. Y. Guo, B. Din, Y. Liu, X. Chang, S. Meng, J.Liu, Talanta, 2004, 62, 207–213.
  18. M.E, Mahmoud, M.M. Osman, M.E. Amer, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, 415, 33–40.
  19. K.S. Abou-El-Sherbini, I.M.M., Kenawy, M.A. Ahmed, M.A. Issa, R. Elmorsi, Talanta, 2002, 58, 289 300. A.R. Ghiasvand., R. Ghaderi, A. Kakanejadifard. Talanta, 2004, 62, 287–292.
  20. O. Abollino, M. Aceto, C. Sarzanini, E. Mentasti, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, 411, 223–237.
  21. A. Walcarius, M. Etienne, C. Delacote, Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 508, 87–98.
  22. V. Gurnani, A.K. Singh, B. Venkataramani, Talanta, 2003, 61, 889–903.
  23. P. Pohl, B. Prusisz, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004, 508, 83– 90. S. Q Pei, Z.L. Fang, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1994, 153, 185–193.
  24. I. Narin, M. Soylak, L. Elci, M. Dogan, Talanta, 2000, 52, 1041–1046.
  25. R. Say, E.Birlik, A.Ersöz, F.Yılmaz, T. Gedikbey, A. Den