Dergiler / Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry / 2019 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Hydrophobic Microbeads for Diethyl Phthalate Removal from Aqueous Solution

Sayfa
77–85
Yayın Tarihi
2019-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The poly(DVB-MATrp) microbeads were also effectively used in bottled, and tap water samples spiked with DEP.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, hydrophobic poly(divinylbenzene-N-methacryloyl-L-tryptophan methyl ester) [poly(DVB-MATrp)] microbeads (average diameter = 150-200 μm) were used for diethyl phthalate (DEP) removal from aqueous solution.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The effect of initial DEP concentration was investigated in the concentration range of 1-300 mg/L at pH 3.0.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The poly(DVB-MATrp) microbeads were also effectively used in bottled, and tap water samples spiked with DEP.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Diethyl phthalate · adsorption · microbead

Abstract

In this study, hydrophobic poly(divinylbenzene-N-methacryloyl-L-tryptophan methyl ester) [poly(DVB-MATrp)] microbeads (average diameter = 150-200 μm) were used for diethyl phthalate (DEP) removal from aqueous solution. The poly(DVB-MATrp) microbeads were synthesized by suspension polymerization. The microbeads were used for DEP adsorption from aqueous solution to determine the effect of pH, initial DEP concentration, temperature and contact time on the adsorbed amounts of DEP. The effect of initial DEP concentration was investigated in the concentration range of 1-300 mg/L at pH 3.0. The experiments were conducted at three different temperatures (25°C, 35°C and 45°C). The maximum DEP adsorption capacity was calculated as 251.3 mg/g at pH 3.0 (25°C). The adsorbed amount of DEP onto the poly(DVB-MATrp) was decreased with increasing temperature due to the exothermic nature of the adsorption. The kinetic studies demonstrated that the adsorption process reached equilibrium at around 30 min. The Langmuir isotherm model fitted the adsorption data. The pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models were employed to evaluate the adsorption process. The prepared microbeads were repeatedly used for DEP adsorption without a significant change in the adsorption capacity. The poly(DVB-MATrp) microbeads were also effectively used in bottled, and tap water samples spiked with DEP.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OSMAN, B., ÖZER, E. T. (2019). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Hydrophobic Microbeads for Diethyl Phthalate Removal from Aqueous Solution. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 1, 77–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/255798

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. A. Charles Staples, R. Dennis Peterson, F. Thomas Parkerton, J. William Adams, The environmental fate of phthalate esters: a literature review, Chemosphere, 35 (1997) 667-749. 2. J. Manori Silva, E. Samandar, A. John Reidy, R. Hauser, L. Larry Needham, M. Antonia Calafat, Metabolite profiles of di-n-butylphthalate in humans and rats, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41 (2007) 7576-7580. 3. K. Kelly Ferguson, R. Loch-Caruso, D. John Meeker, Urinary phthalate metabolites in relation to biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress: NHANES 1999-2006, Environ. Res., 111 (2011) 718-726. 4. K. Selma Kranich, H. Frederiksen, A. Maria Andersson, N. Jørgensen, Estimated daily intake and hazard quotients and indices of phthtalate diesters for Young danish men, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48 (2013) 706-712. 5. L. Emma Bradley, A. Richard Burden, I. Leon, N. David Mortimer, R. Dennis Speck, L. Castle, Determination of phthalate d ieters i n f oods, F ood A ddit. Contam. A, 30 (2013) 722-734. 6. Y. Bouhamidi, F. Kaouah, L. Nouri, S. Boumaza, M. Trari, Adsorption of diethyl and dibutylphthalates onto activated carbon produced from Albiziajulibrissinpods: kinetics and isotherms, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 14 (2017) 271-284. 7. S. Venkata Mohan, S. Shailaja, M. Rama Krishna, P.N. Sarma, Adsorptive removal of phthalate ester (Di-ethylphthalate) from aqueous phase by activated carbon: a kinetic study, J. Hazard. Mater., 146 (2007) 278-282. 8. E. Tümay Özer, B. Osman, A. Kara, N. Beşirli, Ş. Gücer, H. Sözeri, Removal of diethylphthalate from aqueous phase using magneticpoly (EGDMA–VP) beads, J. Hazard. Mater., 229 (2012) 20-28. 9. N. Chen, G. Fang, D. Zhou, J. Gao, Effects of clay minerals on diethylphthalate degradation in Fenton reactions, Chemosphere, 165 (2016) 52-58. 10. K. Muzamil Gani, A. Ahmad Kazmi, Phthalate contamination in aquatic environment: A critical review of the process factors that influence their removal in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment, Critical Reviews In Environmental Science and Technol., 46 (2016) 1402-1439. 11. I. Gultekin, N.H.Ince, Synthetic endocrine disruptors in the environment and water remediation by advanced oxidation processes, J. Environ. Manag., 85 (2007) 816-832. 12. Z. Dan Wen, D. Wen Gao, W. MinWu, Biodegradation and kinetic analysis of phthalates by an Arthrobacter strain isolated from constructed wet land soil, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98 (2014) 4683-4690. 13. N. Singh, V. Dalal, J. Krishna Mahto, P. Kumar, Biodegr