Amongst these, the best model was determined as Model 10 with the design parameters of 353.15 K, 413.15 K, 295.15 K, 656.37 MWh and 18.08 for T1b, T2d, T2c, Enet and η, respectively.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Öz In this study, taking the different parameters into account, different designs of b-type ORC power plant have analytically conducted.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a conclusion, the available models of b1-type, b2-type and b3-type were determined as Model 12, Model 10 and Model 31, respectively for energy efficiency, net yearly electricity generation and integrated-based values.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Amongst these, the best model was determined as Model 10 with the design parameters of 353.15 K, 413.15 K, 295.15 K, 656.37 MWh and 18.08 for T1b, T2d, T2c, Enet and η, respectively.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Anahtar Kelimeler EATWOS · Geothermal Energy · B-Type ORC
Özet
Öz In this study, taking the different parameters into account, different designs of b-type ORC power plant have analytically conducted. In the designs, Simav geothermal resources have been taken into consideration as the source of the plant. Then, the best design has been determined using EATWOS in the viewpoint of the working conditions. As a conclusion, the available models of b1-type, b2-type and b3-type were determined as Model 12, Model 10 and Model 31, respectively for energy efficiency, net yearly electricity generation and integrated-based values. Amongst these, the best model was determined as Model 10 with the design parameters of 353.15 K, 413.15 K, 295.15 K, 656.37 MWh and 18.08 for T1b, T2d, T2c, Enet and η, respectively.
ARSLAN, O., ARSLAN, A. E., ACAR, M. Ş. (2019). Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 29–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/251616
Atici K.B., Ulucan, A. (2009). Enerji Projelerinin Değerlendirilmesi Sürecinde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımları ve Türkiye Uygulamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı 1, 161-186 (in Turkish)
Yıldırım, B.F., Önder, E. (2015). İşletmeciler, Mühendisler ve Yöneticiler için Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri. Dora Yayınevi, 2. Baskı, Bursa (in Turkish)
Arslan, A. E., Güven, Ö.Z., (2018). Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Üniversite Etkinliklerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Çalışma: Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(6), 86-105
Arslan, A. E., Acar, M. S., Arslan O., (2018). Data Envelopıng Based Effectiveness Analysis of Integrated Geothermal System: Simav Case Study. International Congress on Afro - Eurasian Research IV, 27-29 April 2018
Huang, W., Eling, M., (2013). An efficiency comparison of the non-life insurance industry in the BRIC countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 577-591
Kundakcı, N., (2018). Effıciency Evaluation of State Universities in Turkey wıth EATWOS Method. International Congress on Afro - Eurasian Research IV, 27-29 April 2018
Özbek, A., (2015). Efficiency Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Based in Turkey. International Business Research, 8(9), 1-11
Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L. (2006). Decision Analysis in Energy and Environmental Modeling: an Update. Energy, 31, 2604–2622
Peters, M. L., Zelewski, S. (2006). Efficiency analysis under consideration of satisficing levels for output quantities. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), April 28-May 01, Boston, USA
Özbek, Aşır, (2016), Madencilik Sektöründe Yer Alan Şirketlerin Eatwos İle Karşılaştırılması. Uluslararası Katılımlı 16. Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, 12-14 Ekim 2016, İstanbul
Özbek, A., (2017). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Hayırsever Kuruluşlarında Verimlilik Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, No: 2, 99-114
Soni, V., Singh, S. P., Devinder K. B., (2016). Precise decisions in Indian energy sector by imprecise evaluation. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, Volume 10, Issue 1
Bansal, A. K., Singh, R., Issar, S., Varkey, J., (2014). Evaluation of Vendors Ranking By EATWOS Approach. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(3), 290-311