KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Imitation, Innovation and State Capacity: What Do East Asian Industrial Policies Imply?

K. Ali AKKEMİK
Murat YÜLEK
Sayfa
701–722
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results indicate that state capacity has played an important role in the success of East Asian industrial policies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Since the global financial crisis, industrial policy is back on the agenda in developing economies after a long break.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We elaborate on the successful interventionist industrial policies of the East Asian economies in the past in conjunction with state capacity and technology policies.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results indicate that state capacity has played an important role in the success of East Asian industrial policies.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Imitation · Innovation · State capacity

Abstract

Since the global financial crisis, industrial policy is back on the agenda in developing economies after a long break. The renewed interest in the industrial policy manifested itself in the discussions on the new directions for policymaking. A crucial aspect of the recent industrial policies is technology policies, in which the developing policies face the trade-off between imitation and innovation. In this study, we examine the association between industrial policy and state capacity based on a theoretical model. We elaborate on the successful interventionist industrial policies of the East Asian economies in the past in conjunction with state capacity and technology policies. As evidence from Korea, Singapore and Taiwan shows simultaneous implementation of imitation and innovation policies is possible. Recent experience in China further supports this conclusion. The results indicate that state capacity has played an important role in the success of East Asian industrial policies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKKEMİK, K. A., YÜLEK, M. (2020). Imitation, Innovation and State Capacity: What Do East Asian Industrial Policies Imply?. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 701–722. https://ajindex.com/articles/244978

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2003). Vertical integration and distance to frontier. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(2-3), 630–638.
  2. Aiginger, K., & Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20, 189–207.
  3. Aizenman, J., Jinjarak, Y., & Zheng, H. (2018). Chinese outwards mercantilism: The art and practice of bundling. Journal of International Money and Finance, 86, 31–49.
  4. Akkemik, K. A. (2009). Industrial development in East Asia: A comparative look at Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. World Scientific. Akkemik, K. A., & Menteşoğlu Tuncer, B. (2019). Çin-ABD ticaret savaşları gölgesinde Çin sanayi ve teknoloji politikaları [China’s Industry and Technology Policies in the Shadow of the ChinaUSA Trade Wars]. In C. Bakır & M. Yağcı (Eds.), Çin bilmecesi: Çin’in ekonomik yükselişi, uluslararası ilişkilerde dönüşüm ve Türkiye [China conundrum: The rise of China’s economic transformation in international relations and Turkeyy] (pp. 77–101).
  5. Koç University Press.
  6. Akkemik, K. A., & Yülek, M. (2020). ‘Made in China 2025’ and the recent industrial policy in China. In S. T. Otsubo & C. Otchia (Eds.), Designing integrated industrial policies: Industrial promotion for inclusive development under globalization (pp. 337–364).
  7. Routledge. Andreoni, A., & Chang, H. J. (2019). The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 136–150.
  8. Amsden, A. (1989). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press.
  9. Barwick, P. J., Kalouptsidi, M., & Zahur, N. B. (2019). China’s industrial policy: An empirical evaluation. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 26075. Chang, H. J. (1993). The political economy of industrial Policy in Korea. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(2), 131–157.
  10. Chang, H. J. (2011). Industrial policy: Can we go beyond an unproductive confrontation? In J. Lin & B. Pleskovic (Eds.), Annual World Bank conference on development economics (pp. 83–109).
  11. World Bank. Chang, H. J., & Andreoni, A. (2020). Industrial policy in the 21st century. Development and Change, 51(2), 324–351.
  12. Chang, H. J., & Zach, K. (2018). Industrial development in Asia: Trends in Industrialization and industrial policy experiences of developing Asia. United Nations University WIDER Working Paper No. 2018/120. Cherif, R.