KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2009 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3-4

DOKU DÜZENLEYİCİLERİN FONKSİYONEL ÖLÇÜ MADDESİ OLARAK KULLANIMI

Burcu AKTAŞ
Gülsüm CEYLAN
Emre MUMCU
Emre MUMCU
Özge AKSÜZEK
Özge AKSÜZEK
Fatma ÜNALAN
Sayfa
107–112
Yayın Tarihi
2012-07-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKTAŞ, B., CEYLAN, G., MUMCU, E., MUMCU, E., AKSÜZEK, Ö., AKSÜZEK, Ö., ÜNALAN, F. (2012). DOKU DÜZENLEYİCİLERİN FONKSİYONEL ÖLÇÜ MADDESİ OLARAK KULLANIMI. European Oral Research, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3-4, 107–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/243233

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Ç a l ı k k o c a o ğ l u S. Tam Protezler. 3. B a s k ı. İstanbul: Teknografik M a t b a a c ı l a r. 1998: 154, 166-167, 610-613.
  2. Starcke E N, Marcroft K R. Fischer T E and Sweeney W T. Physical properties o f tissue conditioning materials as used in functional impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 1972: 27: 111ı 119. The Glossary o f Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent,'2005: 94 (1): 10-92. Craig R. Restorative denial materials, tenth Edition. C.V. Mosby 2000. Chase W W. Tissue conditioning using dynamic adaptive stress.1 Prosthet Dent, 1961: 11: 804. McCarthy JA, Moser M S. Mechanical properties o f tissue conditioners. Part 1: Theoretical considerations, behavioral characteristics and tensile properties. J Prosthet Dent, 1978: 40: 89-97. A l o u l R K. Shen C. The influence o f plasticizer loss on the viscoelasticity o f temporary sol) liners. J Prosthodont, 2002: 11 (4): 254-62. Ö z k a n Y K. Y u m u ş a k astar materyalleri ve k l i n i k u y g u l a m a l a r ı. http://www.ido.org.tr /dergiarsivl02.asp?ID = 1393 2005.
  3. Murata H. Hong G, L i Y A. Hamada T. Compatibility o f tissue conditioners and dental stones: effects o f surface roughness.1 Prosthet Dent. 2005: 93: 274-281.
  4. Murata I I. Kawamura M, Hamata T, Saleh S. Kresnoadi LI, T o k i K. Dimensional stability and weight changes o f tissue conditioners.1 Oral Rehabil, 2 0 0 İ: 28: 918-923.
  5. Murata I I. Narasaki Y. Ilamada T, McCabe.IE. A n alcohol-free tissue conditioner- a laboratory evaluation.1 Dent. 2006: 34: 307-315. Braden M. Tissue Conditioners: Composition and Structure. J Dent Res, 1970: 49: 145-14S. 112 McCarthy JA, Moser JB. Tissue conditioning and functional impression materials and techniques. Dent C l i n N o r t h A m, 1984: 4: 239ı 251. Chander S, H i l l M, Moore D, M o r r o w L.Tissue conditioning materials as functional impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2007: 15(2): 67-71. W i l l i a m J O ' B r i e n. Dental Materials and their selection. 3. Ed. Canada: Quintessence books, 2002, p. 87. Graham BS, Jones D \ V. Sutovv EJ. Clinical implications o f resilient denture lining material research. Part IE Gelation and f l o w properties o f tissue conditioners. J Prosthet Dent, 1991: 65:413-418.
  6. McCabe JF, Walls AVVG. A p p l i e d Dental Materials. 8th edn. Oxford: Blaekwell Science Ltd. 1998, p. 108-1 14. Murata H, Hamada T, Harshini, T o k i K, Nikawa H. Effect o f addition o f ethyl alcohol on gelation and viscoelasticity o f tissue