Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2017 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF MANDIBULAR HARD AND SOFT TISSUES IN CLEFT PATIENTS

Sayfa
14–22
Yayın Tarihi
2017-04-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

LLA-TVL and B’-TVL correlated with SNB in cleft patients (p<0.05).Conclusion: Decreased lower lip and chin projection values suggest that mandibular region of cleft patients should be taken into account in forming the treatment plan to improve the esthetic outcome of orthodontic and plastic surgery interventions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the mandibular hard and soft tissue measurements of unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients with non-cleft individuals.Materials and Methods: The study sample comprised of lateral cephalograms of 45 subjects.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Sample included 15 non-cleft (NC), 15 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and 15 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) cases whose age were between 15 to 17. 1 angular 13 linear measurements were carried out using Arnett and Gunson soft tissue cephalometric analysis and 4 angular measurements were calculated with Steiner Analysis.Results: Mandibular incisor inclinations relative to the occlusal plane (Md1-Md OP) were significantly greater and mandibular incisor projections (Md1-TVL) were significantly retrusive in cleft subjects (p<0.05).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:LLA-TVL and B’-TVL correlated with SNB in cleft patients (p<0.05).Conclusion: Decreased lower lip and chin projection values suggest that mandibular region of cleft patients should be taken into account in forming the treatment plan to improve the esthetic outcome of orthodontic and plastic surgery interventions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cleft lip and palate · lateral cephalograms · incisor inclination

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the mandibular hard and soft tissue measurements of unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients with non-cleft individuals.Materials and Methods: The study sample comprised of lateral cephalograms of 45 subjects. Sample included 15 non-cleft (NC), 15 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and 15 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) cases whose age were between 15 to 17. 1 angular 13 linear measurements were carried out using Arnett and Gunson soft tissue cephalometric analysis and 4 angular measurements were calculated with Steiner Analysis.Results: Mandibular incisor inclinations relative to the occlusal plane (Md1-Md OP) were significantly greater and mandibular incisor projections (Md1-TVL) were significantly retrusive in cleft subjects (p<0.05). Projection values pertaining to lower lip anterior (LLA-TVL), soft tissue B point (B’-TVL), and soft tissue pogonion (Pog’-TVL) were significantly deficient as well in cleft patients (p<0.05). Sagittal position of the maxilla (SNA) (p<0.001) and intermaxillary relation of the jaws (ANB) were significantly deficient in UCLP subjects (p<0.05) and BCLP individuals (p<0.01). LLA-TVL and B’-TVL correlated with SNB in cleft patients (p<0.05).Conclusion: Decreased lower lip and chin projection values suggest that mandibular region of cleft patients should be taken into account in forming the treatment plan to improve the esthetic outcome of orthodontic and plastic surgery interventions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARAS, İ., BAYKAL, D., BULUT, M., DOĞAN, S. (2017). EVALUATION OF MANDIBULAR HARD AND SOFT TISSUES IN CLEFT PATIENTS. European Oral Research, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 2, 14–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/243010

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Proff P, Weingartner J, Koppe T, Fanghanel J, Mack F, Gedrange T. Morphofunctional changes of orofacial muscles in patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Ann Anat 2007;189(2):203-207.
  2. Hasanzadeh N, Majidi MR, Kianifar H, Eslami N. Facial soft-tissue morphology of adolescent patients with nonsyndromic bilateral cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25(1):314-317.
  3. Liu RK, Wamalwa P, Lu DW, Li CH, Hu HK, Zou S. Soft-tissue characteristics of operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients in mixed dentition. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22(4):1275-1279.
  4. Toygar TU, Akcam MO, Arman A. A cephalometric evaluation of lower lip in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41(5):485-489.
  5. Moreira I, Suri S, Ross B, Tompson B, Fisher D, Lou W. Soft-tissue profile growth in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: A cephalometric comparison with normal controls at ages 7, 11, and 18 years. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145(3):341-358. Cunningham SJ. The psychology of facial appearance. Dent Update 1999;26(10):438-443.
  6. Yu D, Wang F, Wang X, Fang B, Shen SG. Presurgical motivations, self-esteem, and oral health of orthognathic surgery patients. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24(3):743-747.
  7. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR, Sarver DM. The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod Res 1999;2(2):49-52. Proffit WR. The soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: A new view for a new century. J Esthet Dent 2000;12(1):46-49.
  8. Molsted K, Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, Mars M, McWilliam J, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw WC, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 2. Craniofacial form and soft tissue profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29(5):398-404.
  9. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978;36(4):269-277.
  10. Fish LC, Epker BN. Dentofacial deformities related to midface deficiencies. Integrated orthodontic-surgical correction. J Clin Orthod 1987;21(9):654-664.
  11. Arnett GW, Gunson MJ. Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126(3):290-295. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London,: Allen; 1940.
  12. Todorov A, Olivola CY, Dotsch R, Mende-Siedlecki P. Social attributions from faces: Determi