KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Assessment of curve of spee in different malocclusions

Gülşilay SAYAR
Hüsamettin OKTAY
Sayfa
127–130
Yayın Tarihi
2018-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion Since the depth of curve of Spee is increased in Class II malocclusions, this factor should be considered in treatment planning.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:DOI: 10.26650/eor.2018.475Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the depth of curve of Spee (COS) in Angle Class I, Angle Class II and Angle Class III malocclusions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ninety plaster models were chosen, and were divided into 3 groups (n=30) according to Angle dental malocclusion classification.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion Since the depth of curve of Spee is increased in Class II malocclusions, this factor should be considered in treatment planning.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Curve of spee · malocclusion · angle classification

Abstract

DOI: 10.26650/eor.2018.475Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the depth of curve of Spee (COS) in Angle Class I, Angle Class II and Angle Class III malocclusions. Materials and methods The Samples were chosen among the diagnostic materials in İstanbul Medipol University Department of Orthodontics. Ninety plaster models were chosen, and were divided into 3 groups (n=30) according to Angle dental malocclusion classification. The depth of curve of Spee was measured on left and right sides of mandibular dental models and mean values were used as depth of curve of Spee. ANOVA test was used to evaluate normally distributed data. Comparison of the sides were performed by using paired sample t test. Significance level was set to p<0.05. Results The depth of COS was found as deepest in Class II malocclusion (2.9±0.8 mm) and was relative flat in Class III malocclusion (2.1±0.9 mm) and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between Angle Class I and Class III malocclusions. Conclusion Since the depth of curve of Spee is increased in Class II malocclusions, this factor should be considered in treatment planning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAYAR, G., OKTAY, H. (2018). Assessment of curve of spee in different malocclusions. European Oral Research, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 127–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/243000

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Farella M, Michelotti A, van Eijden TM, Martina R. The curve of Spee and craniofacial morphology: A multiple regression analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 277-81
  2. Sal Carcara C, Preston B, Jureyda O. The relationship between the curve of spee, relapse, and the alexander discipline. Semin Orthod 2001; 7: 90-9
  3. Spee FG, Beidenbach MA, Hotz M, Hitchcock HP. The gliding path of the mandible along the skull. Ferdinand graf spee (1855-1937), prosector at the Anatomy Institute of Kiel. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100: 670-5
  4. Braun S, Hnat WP, Johnson BE. The curve of spee revisited. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 206-10
  5. De Praeter J, Dermaut L, Martens G, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Long-term stability of the leveling of the curve of spee. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 266-72
  6. Xu H, Suzuki T, Muronoi M, Ooya K. An evaluation of the curve of spee in the maxilla and mandible of human permanent healthy dentitions. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 536-9
  7. Marshall SD, Caspersen M, Hardinger RR, Franciscus RG, Aquilino SA, Southard TE. Development of the curve of spee. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 344-52
  8. Osborn JW. Relationship between the mandibular condyle and the occlusal plane during hominid evolution: Some of its effects on jaw mechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1987; 73: 193-207
  9. Osborn JW. Orientation of the masseter muscle and the curve of spee in relation to crushing forces on the molar teeth of primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993; 92: 99-106
  10. Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 1-22
  11. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62: 296-309
  12. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 382-90
  13. Otto RL, Anholm JM, Engel GA. A comparative analysis of intrusion of incisor teeth achieved in adults and children according to facial type. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 437-46
  14. Schudy FF. The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics. Angle Orthod 1968; 38: 19-39
  15. Ahmed I, Nazir R, Gul e E, Ahsan T. Influence of malocclusion on the depth of curve of spee. J Pak Med Assoc 2011; 61: 1056-9
  16. Baragar FA, Osborn JW. Efficiency as a predictor of human jaw design in the sagittal plane. J Biomech 1987; 20: 447-57
  17. Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 365-9
  18. Sohmura T, Kojima T, Wakabay