Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

Comparative assessment of 3D reconstruction technique and Cavalieri’s principle in predicting the mandibular bone defect volumes

Sayfa
105–110
Yayın Tarihi
2018-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The 3D reconstruction method is a reliable technique in measuring volume of bony defects.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:DOI: 10.26650/eor.2018.478Purpose The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Cavalieri’s principle and 3D reconstruction in predicting the volume of a bony defect.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Each mandible was then scanned using a CBCT and volume measurements were made for each defect using two techniques: Cavalieri’s principle and 3D reconstruction.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The 3D reconstruction method is a reliable technique in measuring volume of bony defects.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Cone-beam CT · three-dimensional imaging · Cavalieri’s principle

Abstract

DOI: 10.26650/eor.2018.478Purpose The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Cavalieri’s principle and 3D reconstruction in predicting the volume of a bony defect. Materials and Methods Defects of the same approximate size were created on nine artificial mandibles. The actual volume of the defect on each mandible was measured by water displacement, and served as the control. Each mandible was then scanned using a CBCT and volume measurements were made for each defect using two techniques: Cavalieri’s principle and 3D reconstruction. For each defect, the volume obtained by each of the two techniques was compared to the control volume using the analysis of variances (ANOVA) with p<0.05. Results ANOVA between the control, 3D reconstruction and Cavalieri’s principle groups showed no statistically significant differences (p=.058). When the control group was further analyzed by Dunnett’s post-hoc test, the results from Cavalieri’s principle were found to be statistically different than the control group (p=.035), whereas the results of 3D reconstruction technique did not reach the level of significance (p=.523). Conclusion Cavalieri’s principle significantly underestimates the actual control volume, and is less accurate than the 3D reconstruction technique. The 3D reconstruction method is a reliable technique in measuring volume of bony defects.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALTAY, M. A., QUERESHY, F. A., NİJHAWAN, S. K., TEPPA, J. F., HORAN, M. P., YILDIRIMYAN, N., BAUR, D. A. (2018). Comparative assessment of 3D reconstruction technique and Cavalieri’s principle in predicting the mandibular bone defect volumes. European Oral Research, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 105–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/242996

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Shiratori LN, Marotti J, Yamanouchi J, Chilvarquer I, Contin I, Tortamano-Neto P. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 797-804
  2. Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Dias Pereira LA, Marcantonio E Jr, Wenzel A. Fate of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts used for ridge augmentation. A CBCT-based analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 167-73
  3. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 615-24
  4. Grütter L, Belser UC. Implant loading protocols for the partially edentulous esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 169-79
  5. Van Oosterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, Van Der Perre G, Naert I. Peri-implant bone tissue strains in cases of dehiscence: a finite element study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 327-33
  6. Louis, PJ. Bone Grafting the Mandible. Den Clin N Am 2011; 55: 673-95
  7. Quereshy FA, Dhaliwal HS, El SA, Horan MP, Dhaliwal SS. Resorbable screw fixation for cortical onlay bone grafting: a pilot study with preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 2497-502
  8. Smolka W, Eggensperger N, Carollo V, Ozdoba C, Iizuka T. Changes in the volume and density of calvarial split bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 149-55
  9. Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, Michiels K, van Steenberghe D. Volumetric analysis of extraction sockets using cone beam computed tomography: a pilot study on ex vivo jaw bone. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 985-90
  10. Quereshy FA, Barnum G, Demko C, Horan M, Palomo JM, Baur DA, Jannuzzi J. Use of cone beam computed tomography to volumetrically assess alveolar cleft defects-preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: 188-91
  11. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 109-19
  12. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 410-6
  13. Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Saricaoglu ST, Bas O, Sahin B, Küçük M. The estimation of the volume of sheep mandibular defects using cone-beam computed tomography images and a stereological method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: