Dergiler / European Oral Research / 2020 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2

Effects of surface coating on the flexural strength of fluoridereleasing restorative materials after water aging for one year

Sayfa
62–68
Yayın Tarihi
2020-05-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The resin coating improved the flexural strength of some glass ionomer-based materials but the water aging decreased the same physical properties.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: To evaluate the effects of surface coating and one-year water storage on the flexural strength of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Each group was subdivided into two groups stored in distilled water at 37◦C for 24 h and 1 year before testing (n=10).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The resin coating improved the flexural strength of some glass ionomer-based materials but the water aging decreased the same physical properties.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Flexural strength · Glass ionomer cement · Scanning electron microscopy

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of surface coating and one-year water storage on the flexural strength of fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Forty specimens were prepared from each material; GCP Glass Fill (GCP), Amalgomer CR (AHL), Zirconomer (Shofu), Fuji IX GP Capsule (GC), Beautifil II (Shofu), Estelite Σ Quick (Tokuyama) and reliaFIL LC (AHL). The specimens were randomly divided into two groups; surface coated with G-Coat Plus (GC) and uncoated. Each group was subdivided into two groups stored in distilled water at 37◦C for 24 h and 1 year before testing (n=10). The flexural strength was evaluated using three-point bending test according to the ISO 4049:2009 standard using a universal testing machine. After flexural strength test, a cross-section of the coated specimens was evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: A significant increase was observed on the flexural strength of Amalgomer CR, Zirconomer and Fuji IX GP after 24 h when G-Coat Plus was applied (p<0.05). This significant increase was observed on the flexural strength of only Amalgomer CR and Zirconomer after 1 year (p<0.05). The highest flexural strength was obtained with Beautifil II, Estelite Σ Quick and reliaFIL LC after 24 h and 1 year (p<0.05). After 1 year, there was decrease on the flexural strength of the other materials except Beautifil II, Estelite Σ Quick and reliaFIL LC. Conclusion: The resin coating improved the flexural strength of some glass ionomer-based materials but the water aging decreased the same physical properties.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UĞURLU, M. (2020). Effects of surface coating on the flexural strength of fluoridereleasing restorative materials after water aging for one year. European Oral Research, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 2, 62–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/242935

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1972;132(4):133-5
  2. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials--fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007;23(3):343-62
  3. Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(2):293-300
  4. Nicholson JW. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018;4(1):63-71
  5. Ilie N. Maturation of restorative glass ionomers with simplified application procedure. J Dent. 2018;798:46-52
  6. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000;16(2):129-38
  7. Bagheri R, Azar MR, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect of aging on the fracture toughness of aesthetic restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2010;23(3):142-6
  8. Zhou X, Wang S, Peng X, Hu Y, Ren B, Li M, et al. Effects of water and microbial-based aging on the performance of three dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;80:42-50
  9. Feng J, Cheng L, Zhou X, Xu HHK, Weir MD, Li Q, et al. Effects of water aging on the mechanical and anti-biofilm properties of glass-ionomer cement containing dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate. Dent Mater. 2019;35(3):434-443
  10. Ching HS, Luddin N, Kannan TP, Ab Rahman I, Abdul Ghani NRN. Modification of glass ionomer cements on their physical-mechanical and antimicrobial properties. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(6):557-571
  11. Diem VT, Tyas MJ, Ngo HC, Phuong LH, Khanh ND. The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(3):753-9
  12. Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Siedschlag G, Schubert EW, Lauerer B, Müller FA, et al. Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nanofilled resin coating. Am J Dent. 2011;24(2):124-8
  13. Bonifácio CC, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ. Coating glass-ionomer cements with a nanofilled resin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012;70(6):471-7
  14. Bagheri R, Palamara J, Mese A, Manton DJ. Effect of a self-adhesive coating on the load-bearing capacity of tooth-coloured restorative materials. Aust Dent J. 2017;62(1):71-78
  15. Zoergiebel J, Ilie N. Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effec